Steve James | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Programmable Cellular Automata

Cellular automata is a local computation paradigm where complex behavior can arise from local interactions between simple functions. This paradigm has been used to explain many systems such as biological processes, traffic simulation, computer networks, etc. In games, cellular automata have been used in games such as SimCity and for the generation of spatial content such as caves or dungeons. However, creating effective local rules is hard and unintuitive. Cellular automata can be effectively evolved, but may still be hard to interpret. In this work, we introduce the concept of programmable cellular automata, where we represent the system as Python code. We also modularize the cellular automata into local functions and a decision function. Local functions take a local neighborhood and return a value, while the decision function takes the output of the local functions and decides the value of the next state. Separating the cellular automata into modules written in Python helps with understanding how these systems are working. We also explore adding global functions where they take the whole state and compute a function from it. We tested generating levels for three different games from the PCG Benchmark. The results showed that global functions decrease the number of iterations that cellular automata need to solve a problem, and that we cannot find solutions for some problems with purely local functions. Looking into the generated functions, we can see common functions that have been used in different experiments, which not only helps us understand the generator but also helps us understand these games better and what is important for them.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2020

If dropout limits trainable depth, does critical initialisation still matter? A large-scale statistical analysis on ReLU networks

Recent work in signal propagation theory has shown that dropout limits the depth to which information can propagate through a neural network. In this paper, we investigate the effect of initialisation on training speed and generalisation for ReLU networks within this depth limit. We ask the following research question: given that critical initialisation is crucial for training at large depth, if dropout limits the depth at which networks are trainable, does initialising critically still matter? We conduct a large-scale controlled experiment, and perform a statistical analysis of over $12000$ trained networks. We find that (1) trainable networks show no statistically significant difference in performance over a wide range of non-critical initialisations; (2) for initialisations that show a statistically significant difference, the net effect on performance is small; (3) only extreme initialisations (very small or very large) perform worse than criticality. These findings also apply to standard ReLU networks of moderate depth as a special case of zero dropout. Our results therefore suggest that, in the shallow-to-moderate depth setting, critical initialisation provides zero performance gains when compared to off-critical initialisations and that searching for off-critical initialisations that might improve training speed or generalisation, is likely to be a fruitless endeavour.

stat.ML↗