Su Mei Gwen Ho | Searcharxiv

arXiv2025

Framework Matters: Energy Efficiency of UI Automation Testing Frameworks

We examine per action energy consumption across four web user interface (UI) automation testing frameworks to determine whether consistent tendencies can guide energy-aware test design. Using a controlled client-server setup with external power metering, we repeat each UI action (refresh, click variants, checkbox, drag&drop, input-text, scroll) 35 times. Across each of the actions, energy costs vary by both framework and action. Puppeteer is the most efficient for left-click, right-click, double-click, checkbox, and input-text; Selenium is the most efficient for refresh and scroll; Nightwatch is generally the least energy efficient. The energy cost of performing the same action varied by up to a factor of six depending on the framework. This indicates that providing transparency of energy consumption for UI automation testing frameworks allows developers to make informed, energy-aware decisions when testing a specific UI action.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

Energy and Time Complexity for Sorting Algorithms in Java

The article investigates the relationship between time complexity and energy consumption in sorting algorithms, focusing on commonly-used algorithms implemented in Java: Bubble Sort, Counting Sort, Merge Sort, and Quick Sort. The significance of understanding this relationship is driven by the increasing energy demands of Information and Communication Technology systems and the potential for software optimization to contribute to energy efficiency. If we find a strong correlation between time complexity and energy usage, it would enhance the ability of software developers to create energy-efficient applications. This quantitative study researches the execution of four selected sorting algorithms with input varying over input sizes (25000 to 1 million) and input order types (best, worst, and random cases) on a single kernel in a Java-enabled system. The input size is adjusted according to the type's maximum execution time, resulting in 136 combinations, totalling 12960 measurements. Wall time and the CPU energy consumption is measured using Intel's RAPL. Statistical analysis are used to examine the correlations between time complexity, wall time, and energy consumption. The study finds a strong correlation between time complexity and energy consumption for the sorting algorithms tested. More than 99% of the variance in energy consumption for Counting Sort, Merge Sort, and Quick Sort depend on their time complexities. More than 94% of the variance in energy consumption for Bubble Sort depends on its time complexity. The results affirm that time complexity can serve as a reliable predictor of energy consumption in sequential sorting algorithms. This discovery could guide software developers in choosing energy-efficient algorithms by considering time complexities.

cs.SE↗