SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Suchibrata Patra

Publications and source records attributed to Suchibrata Patra.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Multiparametric MRI Radiomics and Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Treatment Response in Glioblastoma

Distinguishing True Progression (TP) from Pseudo-Progression (PsP) after chemoradiotherapy remains a major diagnostic challenge in GBM, as both entities present near-identical appearances on conventional contrast-enhanced post-treatment MRI. This distinction carries substantial clinical weight, since TP and PsP demand divergent management yet cannot be reliably separated on routine imaging alone. We investigated whether radiomic features derived from a parsimonious, voxel-wise pharmacokinetic model of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, combined with MGMT status, could discriminate between the two. The cohort comprised 82 adults with IDH-wildtype GBM who developed a new contrast-enhancing lesion within six months of chemoradiotherapy; classification (53 TP, 29 PsP) was established by histopathology where available (n=52) and modified RANO criteria otherwise (n=30). At every voxel, contrast-concentration time courses were fitted to five candidate pharmacokinetic models, and the best fit was retained by AIC minimisation, yielding parsimonious Ktrans, Ve, Vp, and taui maps adapting to local heterogeneity rather than a single fixed model across the tumour. Following segmentation, 1,073 radiomic descriptors were extracted and reduced via Mann-Whitney U filtering and Elastic Net, then used to train five classifiers across four feature configurations. A Random Forest classifier combining parsimonious DCE-MRI radiomics with MGMT status achieved the best discrimination (mean AUC 0.89, sensitivity 0.93, specificity 0.76, F1 0.90), outperforming features without MGMT (0.84), a T1-post-contrast baseline (0.72), and a single-model extended-Tofts analysis (0.68). Shape and textural descriptors of the Ktrans map, with tumour volume, were the strongest predictors, MGMT contributing a smaller, independent effect. Allowing the model to vary voxel-wise improves non-invasive discrimination.

stat.ME

Causal Inference of Blood Pressure Reduction and Coronary Heart Disease Risk in the Framingham Study

Standard cardiovascular risk calculators, including the Framingham Risk Score and the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations, estimate the conditional probability P(CHD | SysBP = s) rather than the interventional quantity P(CHD | do(SysBP = s)). When confounding is present, this distinction has direct clinical consequences: observational estimates may systematically overstate the absolute benefit of antihypertensive treatment. We applied Pearl's do-calculus to the Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort (n = 4,240; primary analysis on 3,776 complete cases; 574 ten-year coronary heart disease events). A structurally corrected directed acyclic graph (DAG) was specified and evaluated using conditional independence testing. The average causal effect (ACE) of a 20 mmHg systolic blood pressure reduction was estimated by g-computation with bootstrap confidence intervals, corroborated by propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting. G-computation yielded an ACE of 3.40 percent absolute risk reduction (95 percent CI: 2.64 to 4.14), compared with a naive observational estimate of 4.14 percent, corresponding to an approximate 21.8 percent relative overestimation. Conditional average treatment effects were estimated using R-Learner and T-Learner metalearners. These findings suggest that observational cardiovascular risk tools may overestimate the absolute benefit of blood pressure reduction, with implications for clinical risk stratification and prescribing thresholds.

stat.AP