Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Svetlozar T. Rachev

Publications and source records attributed to Svetlozar T. Rachev.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Portfolio Optimization under Heavy Tails and Asymmetric Volatility: Evidence from Taiwan-Exposed ETFs

Taiwan's central role in global semiconductor manufacturing exposes Taiwan-related ETFs to technology concentration, geopolitical uncertainty, and supply-chain disruptions, resulting in return distributions characterized by heavy tails, volatility clustering, and asymmetric responses to negative shocks. This paper analyzes thirty U.S.-listed ETFs with Taiwan exposure from February 2015 to February 2025 using tail-risk diagnostics, asymmetric volatility modeling, and portfolio optimization under mean--variance and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) criteria. Hill tail-index estimates document heavy-tailed behavior across the ETF universe. Although the ETFs exhibit broadly similar asymptotic tail-decay behavior, semiconductor-focused ETFs produce substantially larger VaR and CVaR estimates than diversified benchmarks, indicating that cross-sectional differences in extreme downside risk are driven primarily by differences in return scale rather than tail-index estimates. GJR-GARCH estimates reveal persistent, asymmetric volatility, and the apparent long memory in squared returns is largely attributable to conditional heteroskedasticity rather than genuine fractional integration. CVaR optimization produces substantially more concentrated allocations than mean--variance optimization, with the CVaR tangent portfolio allocating a large weight to SMH during the post-COVID AI-driven expansion. Portfolio rankings depend on the performance measure: the Sharpe ratio and STARR measure favor the equally weighted portfolio, whereas the Rachev ratio favors CVaR-based portfolios. Overall, the results suggest that variance-based frameworks alone provide an incomplete characterization of risk in technology-concentrated investment environments and that variance-based and tail-sensitive performance measures may favor different portfolios over the same sample period.

q-fin.PM↗

Portfolio Optimization and Tail-Risk Analytics of Actively Managed ETFs

This paper examines portfolio optimization and tail-risk analytics for a heterogeneous universe of actively managed investment funds. Using daily Bloomberg data for 30 funds from 4 December 2020 to 24 December 2025, the study evaluates buy-and-hold, mean--variance, CVaR-based, and tangency-type strategies under long-only and long--short constraints. The sample consists predominantly of actively managed ETFs, with PTTRX retained as an actively managed fixed-income mutual-fund comparator. The results show substantial heterogeneity across thematic equity, fixed-income, income-oriented, multi-asset, and alternative strategies, creating both diversification opportunities and meaningful differences in volatility, drawdown behavior, downside exposure, and tail risk. Historical results indicate that tangency-type portfolios are generally the strongest competitors to the buy-and-hold benchmark in cumulative and risk-adjusted terms, while minimum-variance and CVaR-minimizing portfolios sacrifice upside participation for stronger downside control. Dynamic allocation does not improve all strategies uniformly: the long-only dynamic CVaR-95 portfolio is consistently attractive across several risk-adjusted criteria, whereas long--short dynamic tangency-CVaR portfolios perform strongly but are more sensitive to turnover and implementation costs. Tail-risk diagnostics based on empirical VaR, Expected Shortfall, maximum drawdown, left-tail Hill estimators, and POT--GPD methods show that downside tail exposure remains meaningful after portfolio aggregation. Overall, actively managed ETFs are best evaluated as components of a joint investment opportunity set in which dependence structure, portfolio design, dynamic allocation, implementation frictions, and tail-risk exposure jointly shape performance.

q-fin.PM↗

Portfolio Optimization for Commodity ETFs under Heavy-Tailed Returns

This paper examines portfolio optimization for commodity exchange-traded funds (ETFs) under heavy-tailed return behavior. Using daily Bloomberg data for 30 U.S.-listed commodity ETFs from 12 December 2018 to 16 December 2024, we study funds spanning agriculture, energy, metals, and broad commodity index exposure. We compare a passive buy-and-hold portfolio with rolling-window optimized portfolios formed under mean--variance and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) criteria, considering both long-only and restricted long--short strategies. The results showed substantial heterogeneity across commodity sectors, with energy and broad commodity index funds displaying pronounced volatility, skewness, and excess kurtosis. Historical optimization indicated that minimum-risk and CVaR-based portfolios provided more stable cumulative performance than tangent portfolios and generally improved Sharpe, Calmar, and STARR$_{0.95}$ ratios. Extreme-value diagnostics showed that optimized portfolios remained exposed to heavy downside tails, so improved risk-adjusted performance did not eliminate extreme-loss risk. A dynamic extension based on ARMA--GARCH marginal models, Student--$t$ copula dependence, and one-step-ahead predictive scenarios improved performance mainly when combined with minimum-risk or CVaR-based objectives. Dynamic mean--variance tangent portfolios performed less reliably, reflecting sensitivity to expected-return estimation error. Transaction-cost robustness checks further showed that the practical value of dynamic optimization depended on turnover control, with low-turnover dynamic CVaR tangent portfolios remaining more resilient to implementation costs. Overall, the analysis showed that commodity ETF allocation benefited most from conservative and downside-risk-aware optimization, while optimized portfolios continued to require explicit tail-risk and implementation diagnostics.

q-fin.PM↗

Innovative Extensions to Option Pricing: Asymmetric Brownian Motion and Random Walk Approaches

Classical option pricing models, such as Bachelier and Black--Scholes--Merton, postulate symmetric Brownian diffusion, which limits their capacity to reflect empirical phenomena including return skewness, heavy tails, and volatility asymmetry. This paper develops an innovative extension: the Geometric Asymmetric Brownian Motion (GABM), unifying asymmetric Brownian motion and random walk methodologies within the Bachelier--Black--Scholes--Merton framework. The approach harnesses the Cherny--Shiryaev--Yor invariance principle (CSYIP) to define asymmetric random walk integrals, where local time at the origin generates skewness and state-dependent risk. Closed-form option pricing formulas are derived, and a discrete-time binomial tree algorithm is constructed and shown to converge rigorously to the GABM limit. By incorporating a smoothed functional form based on the normal inverse Gaussian distribution, the model allows for flexible, state-dependent volatility calibration. Numerical experiments demonstrate the resulting option price and implied volatility surfaces, highlighting the framework's enhanced ability to capture persistent market asymmetry and complex risk behaviors observed in empirical data.

q-fin.MF↗

Option Pricing under Stochastic Volatility and Jumps:A PIDE Framework with Empirical Evidence

We develop a partial integro-differential equation (PIDE) framework for option pricing under joint stochastic volatility and jump dynamics, and evaluate its empirical content using the S&P500 index option contracts across three maturities. The framework is derived from the infinitesimal generator of an affine Lévy-type process and implemented via finite-difference discretization with FFT-based treatment of the nonlocal jump operator. Calibration via GMM reveals that stochastic volatility accounts for the dominant share of pricing improvement, where relative to Black-Scholes, the Heston specification reduces implied-volatility RMSE by 39%. Jump augmentation via either Merton or CGMY specifications yields marginal improvements concentrated at short maturities and in the deep out-of-the-money region. The calibrated CGMY activity index supports a compound-Poisson structure, consistent with high-frequency evidence on S&P500 index returns.

q-fin.PR↗

Memory, Roughness, and Information Persistence in Financial Markets: A Structural Approach to Volatility Forecasting

This paper studies the joint role of long-memory dynamics,rough-volatility behavior, and persistence-based forecasting features in equity volatility modeling. We combine semiparametric long-memory estimation, rough-volatility diagnostics, and structured forecasting regressions to examine whether persistence measures contain economically meaningful forecasting information beyond conventional volatility predictors. Using a panel of 115 S&P500 constituents from November 2001 through April 2026, we document that volatility proxies exhibit substantial long-memory behavior and locally rough dynamics. The cross-sectional mean Geweke-Porter-Hudak estimate of the memory parameter is $\hat{d} = 0.226$, while the corresponding local-Whittle estimate is $\hat{d} = 0.440$, with statistical significance observed across nearly the entire panel. Rolling estimates of persistence rise substantially during the global financial crisis and the COVID period and display a positive contemporaneous association with the VIX. We then examine whether persistence-related features improve out-of-sample volatility forecasts beyond standard HAR and HAR-X benchmarks. Incorporating cross-sectional persistence aggregates, sectoral persistence measures, and persistence-by-stress interaction terms produces moderate but statistically significant forecasting improvements, particularly at longer horizons and during stress regimes. Forecast gains are strongest during periods of elevated market volatility and in volatility-managed portfolio applications. The results suggest that persistence measures may serve as useful reduced-form indicators of the duration and propagation of uncertainty in financial markets, although the paper does not claim structural identification of the economic mechanisms generating persistence.

q-fin.ST↗

An Axiomatic Risk-Reward Framework for Sustainable Investing

Continued interest in sustainable investing calls for an axiomatic approach to measures of risk and reward that focus not only on financial returns, but also on measures of environmental and social sustainability, i.e. environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores. We propose definitions for ESG-coherent risk measures and ESG reward-risk ratios based on functions of bivariate random variables that are applied to financial returns and real-time ESG scores, extending the traditional univariate measures to the ESG case. We provide examples and present an empirical analysis in which the ESG-coherent risk measures and ESG reward-risk ratios are used to rank stocks.

q-fin.MF↗

Option-Implied Zero-Coupon Yields: Unifying Bond and Equity Markets

This paper addresses a critical inconsistency in models of the term structure of interest rates (TSIR), where zero-coupon bonds are priced under risk-neutral measures distinct from those used in equity markets. We propose a unified TSIR framework that treats zero-coupon bonds as European options with deterministic payoffs ensuring that they are priced under the same risk-neutral measure that governs equity derivatives. Using put-call parity, we extract zero-coupon bond implied yield curves from S&P 500 index options and compare them with the US daily treasury par yield curves. As the implied yield curves contain maturity time T and strike price K as independent variables, we investigate the K-dependence of the implied yield curve. Our findings, that at-the-money, option-implied yield curves provide the closest match to treasury par yield curves, support the view that the equity options market contains information that is highly relevant for the TSIR. By insisting that the risk-neutral measure used for bond valuation is the same as that revealed by equity derivatives, we offer a new organizing principle for future TSIR research.

q-fin.PR↗

The Three-Dimensional Decomposition of Volatility Memory

This paper develops a three-dimensional decomposition of volatility memory into orthogonal components of level, shape, and tempo. The framework unifies regime-switching, fractional-integration, and business-time approaches within a single canonical representation that identifies how each dimension governs persistence strength, long-memory form, and temporal speed. We establish conditions for existence, uniqueness, and ergodicity of this decomposition and show that all GARCH-type processes arise as special cases. Empirically, applications to SPY and EURUSD (2005--2024) reveal that volatility memory is state-dependent: regime and tempo gates dominate in equities, while fractional-memory gates prevail in foreign exchange. The unified tri-gate model jointly captures these effects. By formalizing volatility dynamics through a level--shape--tempo structure, the paper provides a coherent link between information flow, market activity, and the evolving memory of financial volatility.

q-fin.MF↗

Probability Weighting Meets Heavy Tails: An Econometric Framework for Behavioral Asset Pricing

We develop an econometric framework integrating heavy-tailed Student's $t$ distributions with behavioral probability weighting while preserving infinite divisibility. Using 432{,}752 observations across 86 assets (2004--2024), we demonstrate Student's $t$ specifications outperform Gaussian models in 88.4\% of cases. Bounded probability-weighting transformations preserve mathematical properties required for dynamic pricing. Gaussian models underestimate 99\% Value-at-Risk by 19.7\% versus 3.2\% for our specification. Joint estimation procedures identify tail and behavioral parameters with established asymptotic properties. Results provide robust inference for asset-pricing applications where heavy tails and behavioral distortions coexist.

q-fin.MF↗

Performance and Risk Analytics of Asian Exchange-Traded Funds

Investing in Asian markets through exchange-traded funds (ETFs) provides investors with access to rapidly expanding economies and valuable diversification opportunities. This study examines the advantages and challenges of investing in Asian ETFs by conducting comprehensive risk assessments, portfolio analyses, and performance comparisons. The dataset comprises 29 ETFs offering exposure across a wide spectrum of Asian markets, including broad regional funds, country-specific ETFs, as well as sector-focused funds, dividend-oriented ETFs, small-cap portfolios, and emerging market bond ETFs. To evaluate risk and return dynamics, the study employs Markowitz's efficient frontier to identify optimal portfolios for given levels of risk, and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) to capture potential extreme losses for a more comprehensive risk assessment. Multiple portfolio configurations are analyzed under long-only and long-short investment strategies to assess adaptability across varying market conditions. Furthermore, key performance risk measures, including the Sharpe ratio, Rachev ratio, and stable tail-adjusted return ratio (STARR), are calculated to provide an in-depth evaluation of reward-to-risk efficiency, with particular emphasis on the role of tail behavior in portfolio performance. This research aims to deliver deeper insights into the risk-return trade-offs, tail-risk behavior, and efficiency of Asian ETFs, offering investors a practical foundation for constructing robust and well-diversified portfolios across both emerging and developed Asian markets.

math.OC↗

Evaluating Factor Contributions for Sold Homes

We evaluate the contributions of ten intrinsic and extrinsic factors, including ESG (environmental, social, and governance) factors readily available from website data to individual home sale prices using a P-spline generalized additive model (GAM). We identify the relative significance of each factor by evaluating the change in adjusted R^2 value resulting from its removal from the model. We combine this with information from correlation matrices to identify the added predictive value of a factor. Based on data from 2022 through 2024 for three major U.S. cities, the GAM consistently achieved higher adjusted R^2 values across all cities (compared to a benchmark generalized linear model) and identified all factors as statistically significant at the 0.5% level. The tests revealed that living area and location (latitude, longitude) were the most significant factors; each independently adds predictive value. The ESG-related factors exhibited limited significance; two of them each adding independent predictive value. The elderly/disabled accessibility factor was much more significant in one retirement-oriented city. In all cities, the accessibility factor showed moderate correlation with one intrinsic factor. Despite the granularity of the ESG data, this study also represents a pivotal step toward integrating sustainability-related factors into predictive models for real estate valuation.

econ.GN↗

Asset Pricing in the Presence of Market Microstructure Noise

We present two models for incorporating the total effect of market microstructure noise into dynamic pricing of assets and European options. The first model is developed under a Black-Scholes-Merton, continuous-time framework. The second model is a discrete, binomial tree model developed as an extension of the static Grossman-Stiglitz model. Both models are market complete, providing a unique equivalent martingale measure that establishes a unique map between parameters governing the risk-neutral and real-world price dynamics. We provide empirical examples to extract the coefficients in the model, in particular those coefficients characterizing the influence of the microstructure noise on prices. In addition to isolating the impact of noise on the volatility, the discrete model enables us to extract the noise impact on the drift coefficient. We provide evidence for the primary microstructure noise we believe our empirical examples capture.

q-fin.PR↗

Path-dependent, ESG-valued, option pricing in the Bachelier-Black-Scholes-Merton model

We extend the application of the Cherny-Shiryaev-Yor invariance principle to a unified Bachelier-Black-Scholes-Merton (BBSM) dynamic pricing model. This extension incorporates the influence of the history of the dynamics (i.e., the path dynamics) of a market index on stock price changes. We add an ESG rating component to the price of the risky asset (stock), in such a manner that the impact of the ESG rating on the stock valuation can be explored through variation in the value of a single parameter. We develop discrete, binary tree, option pricing under this extended model. Using an empirical data set of 10 stocks chosen from the Nasdaq-100, we fit the model to stock price changes and compare model-based and published European call option prices.

q-fin.PR↗

Binary Tree Option Pricing Under Market Microstructure Effects: A Random Forest Approach

We propose a machine learning-based extension of the classical binomial option pricing model that incorporates key market microstructure effects. Traditional models assume frictionless markets, overlooking empirical features such as bid-ask spreads, discrete price movements, and serial return correlations. Our framework augments the binomial tree with path-dependent transition probabilities estimated via Random Forest classifiers trained on high-frequency market data. This approach preserves no-arbitrage conditions while embedding real-world trading dynamics into the pricing model. Using 46,655 minute-level observations of SPY from January to June 2025, we achieve an AUC of 88.25% in forecasting one-step price movements. Order flow imbalance is identified as the most influential predictor, contributing 43.2% to feature importance. After resolving time-scaling inconsistencies in tree construction, our model yields option prices that deviate by 13.79% from Black-Scholes benchmarks, highlighting the impact of microstructure on fair value estimation. While computational limitations restrict the model to short-term derivatives, our results offer a robust, data-driven alternative to classical pricing methods grounded in empirical market behavior.

q-fin.CP↗

Behavioral Probability Weighting and Portfolio Optimization under Semi-Heavy Tails

This paper develops a unified framework that integrates behavioral distortions into rational portfolio optimization by extracting implied probability weighting functions (PWFs) from optimal portfolios modeled under Gaussian and Normal-Inverse-Gaussian (NIG) return distributions. Using DJIA constituents, we construct mean-CVaR99 frontiers, alongwith Sharpe- and CVaR-maximizing portfolios, and estimate PWFs that capture nonlinear beliefs consistent with fear and greed. We show that increasing tail fatness amplifies these distortions and that shifts in the term structure of risk-free rates alter their curvature. The results highlight the importance of jointly modeling return asymmetry and belief distortions in portfolio risk management and capital allocation under extreme-risk environments.

econ.GN↗

Implied Probabilities and Volatility in Credit Risk: A Merton-Based Approach with Binomial Trees

We explore credit risk pricing by modeling equity as a call option and debt as the difference between the firm's asset value and a put option, following the structural framework of the Merton model. Our approach proceeds in two stages: first, we calibrate the asset volatility using the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) formula; second, we recover implied mean return and probability surfaces under the physical measure. To achieve this, we construct a recombining binomial tree under the real-world (natural) measure, assuming a fixed initial asset value. The volatility input is taken from a specific region of the implied volatility surface - based on moneyness and maturity - which then informs the calibration of drift and probability. A novel mapping is established between risk-neutral and physical parameters, enabling construction of implied surfaces that reflect the market's credit expectations and offer practical tools for stress testing and credit risk analysis.

q-fin.RM↗

Winners vs. Losers: Momentum-based Strategies with Intertemporal Choice for ESG Portfolios

This paper introduces a state-dependent momentum framework that integrates ESG regime switching with tail-risk-aware reward-risk metrics. Using a dynamic programming approach and solving a finite-horizon Bellman equation, we construct long-short momentum portfolios that adjust to changing ESG sentiment regimes. Unlike traditional momentum strategies based on historical returns, our approach incorporates the Stable Tail Adjusted Return ratio and Rachev ratio to better capture downside risk in turbulent markets. We apply this framework across three asset classes, Russell 3000 equities, Dow Jones~30 stocks, and cryptocurrencies, under both pro- and anti-ESG market regimes. We find that ESG-loser portfolios significantly outperform ESG-winner portfolios in pro-ESG regimes, a counterintuitive result suggesting that market overreaction to ESG sentiment creates short-term pricing inefficiencies. This pattern is robust across tail-sensitive performance metrics and is most pronounced under a two-week formation and holding period. Our framework highlights how ESG considerations and sentiment regimes alter return dynamics, offering practical guidance for investors seeking to implement responsive momentum strategies under sustainability constraints. These findings challenge conventional assumptions about ESG investing and underscore the importance of dynamic, regime-aware portfolio construction in environments shaped by regulatory signals, investor flows, and behavioral biases.

econ.GN↗