arXiv subjects

Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed

Publications and source records attributed to Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Connecting the Dots: Enduring Performance Gaps in ASR Systems Between Standard and Minority English Varieties

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system evaluations have consistently revealed performance disparities along lines of race, gender, socioeconomic status, and language variety. While these disparities are well-documented, they are often (implicitly or explicitly) treated as issues that subsequent, larger, and more universal models will correct. We challenge this assumption of steady progress in reducing accent-related performance disparities, conducting a longitudinal evaluation of 16 prominent systems released between 2021-2025 across 8 datasets representing diverse English accent varieties. We find that the performance disparity between Mainstream US English (MUSE) and minority accents is stubborn, not reliably declining as a function of time. Specifically, while systems are reliably performant on MUSE, minority accents are subject to risks of large performance degradations between generations of systems, sometimes worsening by 65% absolute Word Error Rate. We argue that standard ASR benchmarks enact an implicit language policy privileging Mainstream US English varieties. As such, these performance disparities reflect systemic failures of language technology development infrastructure that disproportionately affect underrepresented speaker populations.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Teaching Vision-Language Models to Decline: Support Completion Against Mirage

Vision-language models answer questions about images they were never shown, a failure called mirage. Such an answer can be correct without being justified by the evidence, and the difference matters wherever a model's output is checked by someone who did not see its input. We locate the failure in the training objective: cross-entropy separates a model that reads the image from one that ignores it by only the conditional mutual information between answer and image, and no training example rewards declining. We formalise support completion, TIDE, which also shows each training question with a blank image, a same-domain wrong image and an out-of-domain image, with targets that decline, and prove that under TIDE every image-blind predictor is suboptimal by at least 1.04 nats per example, that the optimum declines exactly on the counterfactual kinds while keeping its behaviour on valid images, and that for any finite model the error of its answer-or-decline decision, declining on valid input plus answering on invalid input, is bounded below by how well its representation separates valid from invalid evidence. On Qwen2.5-VL-7B under a frozen held-out protocol with two judges, the three-condition predecessor of TIDE reduced the invalid-evidence mirage rate from 0.759 to 0.097 and the blank-image rate from 0.700 to 0.003 at a false-abstention cost of 0.126; label-free grounding raised the rate to 0.859, a likelihood-advantage contrast moved it only to 0.718 because its empty-image term carries no gradient, and grounding applied after support completion re-opened the mirage. The four-condition protocol on three base models, with seeds and component ablations, is in progress and not reported here.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Activating the Annotator: Operationalising Lived Experience in Data Annotation

Perspectivist NLP has established that annotator positionality shapes labels for subjective tasks, but the field still lacks methods for operationalising it. Positionality is typically operationalised as a demographic form completed at recruitment: a static attribute recorded once and treated as a covariate, on the assumption that the knowledge it indexes is active when the annotator reads an item. This paper treats that assumption as a design problem and asks whether lived experience can instead be primed by the task itself. We introduce AXLE, a pre-annotation stage in which a scenario vignette anchors a short, axis-guided conversation that is synthesised into a first-person micro-narrative and returned to the annotator before labelling begins. In a 2x2 between-subjects study (104 annotators, 30 items, 1,040 annotations) on ambiguous hate speech spanning immigration, religion and gender, elicitation was associated with higher identity resonance and higher sensitivity to harm. It also increased label entropy and lowered inter-annotator agreement: the stage appears to surface plurality rather than manufacture consensus, which distinguishes it from annotator training, whose success criterion is convergence.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Detect Before You Leap: Mirage Detection in Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs) can produce confident answers without relevant visual evidence, a failure mode known as mirage (Asadi et al., 2026). We study pre-release mirage detection: deciding whether a VLM answer should be released or withheld. Our model-agnostic method, Text-Conditioned Layer-wise Internal Alignment (TC-LIA), tracks question-image alignment across the layers of a frozen CLIP ViT-H/14 encoder, summarizing patch-text alignment by final similarity, late-layer top-k alignment, early-to-late gain, and slope. TC-LIA is training-free at deployment with fixed projections and scoring weights, without any label-specific training, and delivers strong detection independently. Additionally, when combined with blank/noise detection, domain routing, and VLM self-assessment, it forms an ensemble whose supervised training improves performance but is an optional add-on. On 19,004 samples spanning 10 VQA domains, 14 state-of-the-art VLMs exhibit 57.3-75.0% base mirage rates. Our proposed TC-LIA alone cuts this to 7.5% with 83.5% Related/Unrelated/Blank-Noise classification accuracy, and the ensemble reaches 84.5-88.4% accuracy with 5.9-7.2% mirage rates (best joint result: 88.4% accuracy, 6.4% mirage rate). Notably, an ensemble trained on a single backbone transfers well to unseen backbones, with the best-transferring source staying within 0.7% accuracy points of per-backbone training across 13 held-out VLMs.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Vmem-$φ$: Low-Compute Out-of-Distribution Detection in Spiking Neural Networks from Membrane-Potential Statistics

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) offer an energy-efficient approach to processing event-camera data, yet out-of-distribution (OOD) detection remains challenging in this setting. Existing OOD detection methods often depend on model outputs or computational components that are unavailable in object detection SNNs or are poorly suited to low-compute deployment. To that effect, we show that the subthreshold membrane potential $V_{\mathrm{mem}}(t)$ provides a useful internal signal for detecting distribution shifts. Simple per-channel statistics derived from these membrane dynamics enable OOD detection. To evaluate this approach, we introduce Gen1-C, an event-camera corruption benchmark developed upon the Prophesee Gen1 automotive detection dataset, containing six sensor-motivated histogram-level stress tests at five severity levels. We further propose the Multi-Descriptor Deviation (MDD), a corruption-blind method that operates on membrane-potential statistics. At the highest corruption severity, MDD achieves an AUROC of more than 0.88 on five of the six corruptions using only a bounded 64-frame observation window. Notably, the remaining corruption is also the one that has the smallest effect on the underlying detector. These results show that the temporal membrane-potential dynamics can provide an effective and low-cost signal for OOD detection in SNN-based event perception.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Data Patching

To provide data-driven quality services to their citizens, every institution determines the acceptability of the citizen data and datafied mechanisms through institutional protocols, including preset standards and policies. However, data meeting standards at one institution might fail to meet a different institution's standards in subsequent phases of the intended citizen services due to mismatched protocols, leading to data devaluation in the citizen service ecosystem. Terming this phenomenon cross-institutional data devaluation, we investigate its causes and workarounds through interviews with 41 Bangladeshi participants. We found that traditional data auditing mechanisms cannot solely address data devaluation; hence, we draw on our findings and theory of cross-institutional AI audits to propose the Citizen-centered Cross-institutional Data Audit (CCDA). We also discuss design and policy implications of CCDA in HCI and datafied citizen services.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

On The Robustness-Resolution Tradeoff In Temporal Quantization Of Event Streams

Event pipelines often discretize asynchronous timestamps before learning. This step looks harmless, but its stability depends directly on temporal resolution. We study this dependence at the representation level. We first show that hard temporal binning is discontinuous: an arbitrarily small timestamp shift near a boundary can move unit event mass between bins. We then define a class of nonnegative, mass-preserving, resolution-faithful continuous encoders and prove that every encoder in this class has global L1 sensitivity at least 2/Delta, where Delta denotes bin width. Linear two-bin interpolation attains this limit. Local support and first-moment preservation also make it unique. Experiments on SHD, N-MNIST, and DVS128 Gesture support the analysis. Across uniform timestamp budgets, linear interpolation lowers mean representation drift by 47-72% while keeping clean accuracy nearly unchanged. On DVS Gesture, it produces zero prediction flips across all tested budgets and three seeds. On SHD, measured drift follows 1/Delta with R^2 = 0.992.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Beyond PUE: A Local Impact Audit Framework for Data Center Environmental Accountability

Standard data center sustainability metrics, including Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE), Water Usage Effectiveness (WUE), and Carbon Usage Effectiveness (CUE), measure a facility's resource use and emissions intensity, normalized to IT energy use, without directly representing local resource scarcity, infrastructure capacity, or social footprint. This gap has become politically consequential. In the first quarter of 2026 alone, local opposition delayed or canceled roughly $130 billion in projects across the United States, driven overwhelmingly by recurring concerns over water use, power demand, infrastructure capacity, and transparency rather than internal efficiency, matching the total for all of 2025 [11]. We propose a five-category local impact audit framework covering efficiency, water stewardship, carbon and renewables, regulatory compliance, and local disclosure. The framework is designed for recurring quarterly assessment and independent verification against public records. We illustrate its application using publicly available data from three Illinois facilities that are currently at the center of local policy disputes, and we examine the data-access barriers that constrain independent verification. We position this framework as both a research contribution and a practical instrument for county-level policymakers evaluating data center permitting and moratorium decisions.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Evaluating Second-Order Bias of LLMs Through Epistemic Entitlement

Evaluations of social bias in LLMs largely focus on whether models generate or imply biased content. However, as LLMs are increasingly used as judges of bias, they may exhibit social biases in subtler ways in how they evaluate biased content, which current methods do not systematically capture. We call this second-order bias: social bias in an LLM's judgment about social bias, which we evaluate through a novel, philosophically grounded reasoning task. Drawing on entitlement epistemology, we conceptualize bias as misplaced foundational knowledge that shapes an agent's rational inquiry, and derive a logical reasoning task for LLMs to judge to whom a biased text is acceptable or non-acceptable. We develop two simple metrics to measure how biased LLM judges are in inferring demographics for acceptability without sufficient support, and how these inferences vary across groups targeted by biased texts. Evaluating open and closed models, we find that our task evades safety guardrails by surfacing bias in model judgment. It varies systematically across target groups, reflects implicit social maps, and shows how models are still triggered by demographic labels. Our work points to the need for LLM bias evaluation in judgment tasks and broadly, for more theoretically grounded approaches to bias evaluation in NLP. We release our code and model responses at https://github.com/uofthcdslab/second-order-bias.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

AMINA: The Inclusive and Accountable AI for Marginalized Immigrant Nonprofit Assistance

Immigrant-led nonprofit groups, particularly those operating in politically sensitive contexts, face exclusion from formal registries and digital platforms. This paper reports a three-phase mixed-methods study with Iranian immigrant nonprofit practitioners: 27 semi-structured interviews, a co-design session, and 7 evaluation and feedback interviews on a prototyped AI assistant, AMINA. Our findings highlight how legitimacy barriers, capacity gaps, and politically charged misinformation constrain nonprofit operations. We translate these insights into design goals for an inclusive nonprofit AI assistant: support for everyday group operations, recognition of informal nonprofit efforts, proactive countering of misinformation, and multilingual, accessible interaction. User evaluations show AMINAs potential to reduce reporting burdens and foster transparency through proactive reminders, and catalyze collaboration across dispersed networks. We contribute to CSCW and HCI by characterizing the cooperative work of transnational immigrant nonprofits, extending scholarship on informality and misinformation, and demonstrating how AI can act as a collaborative partner that strengthens, rather than displaces, the human connections at the core of nonprofit ecosystems, while also posing major risks.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Generative AI Alignment with Hinduism's Theological Plurality and Sacred Representation

Generative AI systems are increasingly used to answer personal questions and mediate everyday practices, including religion. However, existing discussions around AI alignment and ethics have largely centered secular, Western, and Abrahamic assumptions about religion, offering limited attention to other faith-based traditions. In this paper, we examine how Hindu users engage with generative AI systems in relation to their religious knowledge, belief, and practice. Drawing on 15 semi-structured interviews with Bangladeshi Hindu participants, we analyze how users interpret AI-generated religious representations, scriptural explanations, devotional interactions, and synthetic religious media. We found that AI can be both accessible and ethically troubling. While AI supported scriptural inquiry, devotional visualization, and religious storytelling, our study also identified concerns about theological flattening, cultural misrepresentation, devotional manipulation, and the simulation of sacred presence and authority. We conclude by arguing that religious alignment in generative AI requires interpretive alignment: systems that disclose their limits, preserve plurality, and avoid simulating sacred authority and sycophantic personalization.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Studying People to Study AI: Expert Perspectives on the Epistemic Fit and Barriers of Human Research in AI Safety & Ethics

Safety risks of AI are becoming increasingly evident in human interactions with AI technologies. The prominent approaches to evaluating these risks favor technical methods, such as model benchmarks and LLM simulations, often sidelining empirical research with human subjects. To examine this apparent gap in the acceptance of human research, we conduct an expert survey (n=93) and expert interviews (n=17) with AI Safety & Ethics (AISE) researchers from Technical, Sociotechnical, Governance, and Normative backgrounds. Our findings suggest that although there is a consensus that human research is valuable for generating evidence for AISE, its adoption and acceptance are constrained by perceived validity issues, tangible resource barriers, epistemic and personal preferences in methods, and infrastructural constraints from the broader research community. In particular, Technical researchers tend to value human research less and collaborate across disciplines less, suggesting an epistemic tension towards human methods. We propose recommendations for establishing the epistemic fit of human research within AISE and bridging the prohibitive limitations that researchers face, while avoiding performative 'human-washing'.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Mod-Guide: An LLM-based Content Moderation Feedback System to Address Insensitive Speech toward Indigenous Ethnic and Religious Minority Communities

Language operates as a mechanism of both marginalization and resistance, especially for minority communities navigating insensitive and harmful speech online. As content moderation increasingly depends on large language models (LLMs), concerns arise about whether these systems can recognize culturally insensitive speech-language that disregards or marginalizes the cultural and religious perspectives of historically underrepresented communities, often through implicit erasure, misrepresentation, or normative framing, rather than overt hostility. Focusing on Bangladesh's Hindu and Chakma communities -- the country's largest religious and Indigenous ethnic minorities, respectively -- this paper investigates the epistemic limits of LLM-based moderation systems and explores methods for incorporating minority perspectives. We co-created a culturally grounded corpus of insensitive speech with community members and integrated their narratives into moderation pipelines using retrieval augmented generation (RAG). Our tool, Mod-Guide, improves LLM sensitivity to minority viewpoints by leveraging contextual cues derived from lived experience. Through mixed-method evaluations involving both minority and majority participants, we demonstrate that RAG-enhanced moderation responses are more contextually accurate and perceived differently across ethnic lines. This work advances research in human-computer interaction, AI ethics, and social computing by foregrounding restorative justice and hermeneutical inclusion in the design of content moderation systems.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

"Is This Not Enough?": Asymmetries in Institutional Accountability and Collective Sensemaking in the Case of Canada's Algorithmic Visa Triage System

This paper examines how algorithmic accountability in Canada's visa system is articulated institutionally and experienced by applicants across borders. We analyzed Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC)'s Algorithmic Impact Assessment (AIA) for the temporary resident visa (TRV) triage system using the algorithmic decision-making adapted for the public sector (ADMAPS) framework and analyzed Reddit discussions among applicants using a mixed-methods approach. We show that while institutional artifacts emphasize transparency, procedural safeguards, and bounded impacts, applicants engage in collective sensemaking to interpret opaque decisions, often relying on peer knowledge amid uncertainty. We identify three asymmetries between how institutional accountability is structured and how people perceive the process: epistemic asymmetry in access to decision logic, jurisdictional asymmetry in exposure shaped by geopolitical positioning, and temporal--relational asymmetry in how waiting and uncertainty are experienced. We emphasize why it is important to shift attention from institutional design to the uneven distribution of experiences with public-sector algorithmic governance. Together, these contributions demonstrate how algorithmic governance systems in the context of transnational migration produce structured asymmetries not captured by institutional disclosure frameworks, and how extending ADMAPS can account for those uneven translations of accountability.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

BenSyc: Benchmarking Conversational Sycophancy and Human Alignment in LLMs for Bengali Contexts

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly participate in emotionally sensitive social conversations, where responses may shift from balanced support toward excessive validation or escalatory alignment. Existing sycophancy research primarily focuses on factual agreement and instruction-following settings, leaving culturally grounded conversational sycophancy underexplored. We introduce BenSyc, the first benchmark for studying conversational sycophancy in Bengali social contexts. Starting from 11,840 Reddit posts and 170k comments collected from communities across Bangladesh and West Bengal, we construct a human-validated benchmark with binary labels and a fine-grained five-level taxonomy spanning Invalidation, Neutral, Support, Validation, and Escalation. We evaluate more than 15 open and proprietary LLMs on conversational alignment classification and response generation tasks. Results show that distinguishing empathetic support from reinforcement-oriented validation remains challenging even for frontier instruction-tuned models: the best system achieves only 61.8 Macro-F1 on binary detection and 61.7 Macro-F1 on five-class classification. In generation settings, several models frequently produce strongly validating or escalatory responses in emotionally charged situations. Our findings highlight substantial variation across model families and conversational behaviors, underscoring the importance of culturally grounded multilingual benchmarks for evaluating socially aligned conversational AI systems.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Quantifying Media Representation Dynamics Across 25 Years of News Reporting on Policing-related Deaths

We perform the largest known computational analysis of Canadian news narratives about police-involved deaths, spanning 4,000 articles from the last quarter-century. We develop a novel computational model, PerspectiveGap, grounded in prior sociological work on media representation of policing. We find that reporting on police-involved deaths on average features perspectives from state bureaucrats at a rate nearly three times as much as perspectives from other members of the public, including relatives, community members, eyewitnesses, lawyers representing the family, or civil liberties groups. A considerable fraction of articles contain no points of view from civilian actors, though civilian representation has increased in recent years. Qualitatively, we find that state bureaucrats' accounts of these deaths tend to be clinical and procedural, while civilian discourse carries considerably more emotional valence. The PerspectiveGap framework developed here can be contextualized to other jurisdictions, offering a scalable approach for analyzing how media systems construct narratives around policing and accountability.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Evaluating LLMs' Effectiveness on Real-World Consumer Device Repair Questions

Consumer device repair is an important but underexplored testbed for large language models (LLMs). Repair tasks require reasoning over incomplete problem descriptions, hardware-specific diagnostics, actionable troubleshooting, and safety-critical decisions, where incorrect advice can cause device damage, battery hazards, or permanent data loss. We introduce a benchmark of 991 real-world repair questions from Reddit spanning phone repair, computer repair, and data recovery, each paired with technician-written reference solutions, and provide Bangla translations to evaluate cross-lingual performance. We evaluate six state-of-the-art LLMs in English and Bangla using four repair-specific criteria: correctness, completeness, practicality, and safety. Our results show that while LLMs can provide useful repair assistance, they remain unreliable for high-risk real-world repair tasks without rigorous evaluation and explicit safety safeguards. Phone repair is the most difficult and safety-sensitive domain, and all models make substantial errors in board-level diagnosis, repair prioritization, and safe recovery procedures. Across domains and models, Bangla responses consistently perform worse than English responses. Among the evaluated models, GPT-5.4 performs best overall.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

When English Rewrites Local Knowledge: Global Narrative Dominance in Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as cross-lingual knowledge interfaces. However, culturally grounded questions often reflect globally dominant narratives rather than local contexts. We study this failure mode as \textit{global narrative dominance} in Bangla, a low-resource cultural context. We introduce \texttt{CulturalNB}, a dataset of 717 manually curated Bengali cultural instances with parallel Bangla--English question--answer pairs and supporting evidence, metadata, and sociocultural annotations. Using question-only and evidence-based prompting, we evaluate nine state-of-the-art LLMs with human and two independent LLM judges across metrics for cross-lingual consistency, language anchoring, global substitution, institutional bias, and epistemic perspective coverage. Results show that questions asked in English systematically increase global substitution and institutional framing while reducing local perspective coverage. Local evidence improves factual consistency and perspective coverage, but does not eliminate language-induced epistemic shifts. These findings suggest that cultural failures in LLMs are not only missing-knowledge errors but also failures of grounding and narrative prioritization.

cs.CL↗