arXiv subjects

T. Shanks

Publications and source records attributed to T. Shanks.

147 records · Page 9Linked to original sources

arXiv1995

The discovery of a high redshift type 2 QSO

We report the discovery of a high redshift, narrow emission-line galaxy identified in the optical follow-up of deep ROSAT fields. The object has a redshift of z=2.35 and its narrow emission lines together with its high optical and X-ray luminosity imply that this is a rare example of a type 2 QSO. The intrinsic X-ray absorption is either very low or we are observing scattered flux which does not come directly from the nucleus. The X-ray spectrum of this object is harder than that of normal QSOs, and it is possible that a hitherto unidentified population of similar objects at fainter X-ray fluxes could account for the missing hard component of the X-ray background.

astro-ph↗

arXiv1995

Faint UBVRI CCD sequences for wide-field surveys - I

We present the first results of a campaign to secure deep UBVRI CCD photometric calibration in all UK Schmidt equatorial fields with galactic latitudes |b| > 50deg. In this paper we provide information on deep BVRI sequences (B<22) in 14 UK Schmidt survey fields centred at declination=0deg. Deep U sequences have been obtained for 11 of these fields.

astro-ph↗

arXiv1994

A deep ROSAT survey - IV. The evolution of X-ray-selected QSOs

We report on a new estimate of the QSO X-ray luminosity function and its evolution with redshift based on a sample of 107 QSOs detected at faint X-ray fluxes, $S{\rm(0.5-2\,keV)}>4\times10^{-15}\,$\ergcms , with the {\it ROSAT} X-ray satellite. For $q_0=0.5$, the X-ray evolution of QSOs in this sample is consistent with strong luminosity evolution, $L_{\rm X} ^*(z) \propto (1+z)^{3.25\pm0.1}$, at low redshifts ($z<1.60$) and a constant comoving space density at higher redshifts. The derived rate of evolution at low redshifts is thus significantly higher than that obtained previously for the {\it Einstein} Extended Medium Sensitivity Survey (EMSS). Indeed, most luminosity evolution models provide a very poor fit (rejected at the 99 per cent confidence level) when applied to the combined EMSS and {\it ROSAT} samples, although a polynomial evolution model, $L_{\rm X} ^*(z) \propto 10^{(1.14\,z -0.23\,z^2)}$, provides an adequate fit for $q_0=0$. For $q_0=0.5$, a simple power-law luminosity evolution model with a redshift cut-off ($L_{\rm X} ^*(z) \propto (1+z)^{2.51\pm0.1}$,

astro-ph↗