arXiv subjects

Tahina Ramananandro

Publications and source records attributed to Tahina Ramananandro.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Secure Parsing and Serializing with Separation Logic Applied to CBOR, CDDL, and COSE

Incorrect handling of security-critical data formats, particularly in low-level languages, are the root cause of many security vulnerabilities. Provably correct parsing and serialization tools that target languages like C can help. Towards this end, we present PulseParse, a library of verified parser and serializer combinators for non-malleable binary formats. Specifications and proofs in PulseParse are in separation logic, offering a more abstract and compositional interface, with full support for data validation, parsing, and serialization. PulseParse also supports a class of recursive formats -- with a focus on security and handling adversarial inputs, we show how to parse such formats with only a constant amount of stack space. We use PulseParse at scale by providing the first formalization of CBOR, a recursive, binary data format standard, with growing adoption in various industrial standards. We prove that the deterministic fragment of CBOR is non-malleable and provide EverCBOR, a verified library in both C and Rust to validate, parse, and serialize CBOR objects implemented using PulseParse. Next, we provide the first formalization of CDDL, a schema definition language for CBOR. We identify well-formedness conditions on CDDL definitions that ensure that they yield unambiguous, non-malleable formats, and implement EverCDDL, a tool that checks that a CDDL definition is well-formed, and then produces verified parsers and serializers for it. To evaluate our work, we use EverCDDL to generate verified parsers and serializers for various security-critical applications. Notably, we build a formally verified implementation of COSE signing, a standard for cryptographically signed objects. We also use our toolchain to generate verified code for other standards specified in CDDL, including DICE Protection Environment, a secure boot protocol standard.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

DiffSpec: Differential Testing with LLMs using Natural Language Specifications and Code Artifacts

Differential testing can be an effective way to find bugs in software systems with multiple implementations that conform to the same specification, like compilers, network protocol parsers, or language runtimes. Specifications for such systems are often standardized in natural language documents, like Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) specifications or IETF RFC's. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in both generating tests and handling large volumes of natural language text, making them well-suited for analyzing artifacts like specification documents, bug reports, and code implementations. In this work, we leverage natural language and code artifacts to guide LLMs to generate targeted tests that highlight meaningful behavioral differences between implementations, including those corresponding to bugs. We introduce DiffSpec, a framework for generating differential tests with LLMs using prompt chaining. We demonstrate DiffSpec's efficacy on two different (extensively tested) systems, eBPF runtimes and Wasm validators. Using DiffSpec, we generated 1901 differentiating tests, uncovering at least four distinct and confirmed bugs in eBPF, including a kernel memory leak, inconsistent behavior in jump instructions, undefined behavior when using the stack pointer, and tests with infinite loops that hang the verifier in ebpf-for-windows. We also found 299 differentiating tests in Wasm validators pointing to two confirmed and fixed bugs.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

3DGen: AI-Assisted Generation of Provably Correct Binary Format Parsers

Improper parsing of attacker-controlled input is a leading source of software security vulnerabilities, especially when programmers transcribe informal format descriptions in RFCs into efficient parsing logic in low-level, memory unsafe languages. Several researchers have proposed formal specification languages for data formats from which efficient code can be extracted. However, distilling informal requirements into formal specifications is challenging and, despite their benefits, new, formal languages are hard for people to learn and use. In this work, we present 3DGen, a framework that makes use of AI agents to transform mixed informal input, including natural language documents (i.e., RFCs) and example inputs into format specifications in a language called 3D. To support humans in understanding and trusting the generated specifications, 3DGen uses symbolic methods to also synthesize test inputs that can be validated against an external oracle. Symbolic test generation also helps in distinguishing multiple plausible solutions. Through a process of repeated refinement, 3DGen produces a 3D specification that conforms to a test suite, and which yields safe, efficient, provably correct, parsing code in C. We have evaluated 3DGen on 20 Internet standard formats, demonstrating the potential for AI-agents to produce formally verified C code at a non-trivial scale. A key enabler is the use of a domain-specific language to limit AI outputs to a class for which automated, symbolic analysis is tractable.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2019

A Monadic Framework for Relational Verification: Applied to Information Security, Program Equivalence, and Optimizations

Relational properties describe multiple runs of one or more programs. They characterize many useful notions of security, program refinement, and equivalence for programs with diverse computational effects, and they have received much attention in the recent literature. Rather than developing separate tools for special classes of effects and relational properties, we advocate using a general purpose proof assistant as a unifying framework for the relational verification of effectful programs. The essence of our approach is to model effectful computations using monads and to prove relational properties on their monadic representations, making the most of existing support for reasoning about pure programs. We apply this method in F* and evaluate it by encoding a variety of relational program analyses, including information flow control, program equivalence and refinement at higher order, correctness of program optimizations and game-based cryptographic security. By relying on SMT-based automation, unary weakest preconditions, user-defined effects, and monadic reification, we show that, compared to unary properties, verifying relational properties requires little additional effort from the F* programmer.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2019

Meta-F*: Proof Automation with SMT, Tactics, and Metaprograms

We introduce Meta-F*, a tactics and metaprogramming framework for the F* program verifier. The main novelty of Meta-F* is allowing the use of tactics and metaprogramming to discharge assertions not solvable by SMT, or to just simplify them into well-behaved SMT fragments. Plus, Meta-F* can be used to generate verified code automatically. Meta-F* is implemented as an F* effect, which, given the powerful effect system of F*, heavily increases code reuse and even enables the lightweight verification of metaprograms. Metaprograms can be either interpreted, or compiled to efficient native code that can be dynamically loaded into the F* type-checker and can interoperate with interpreted code. Evaluation on realistic case studies shows that Meta-F* provides substantial gains in proof development, efficiency, and robustness.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2018

Verified Low-Level Programming Embedded in F*

We present Low*, a language for low-level programming and verification, and its application to high-assurance optimized cryptographic libraries. Low* is a shallow embedding of a small, sequential, well-behaved subset of C in F*, a dependently-typed variant of ML aimed at program verification. Departing from ML, Low* does not involve any garbage collection or implicit heap allocation; instead, it has a structured memory model à la CompCert, and it provides the control required for writing efficient low-level security-critical code. By virtue of typing, any Low* program is memory safe. In addition, the programmer can make full use of the verification power of F* to write high-level specifications and verify the functional correctness of Low* code using a combination of SMT automation and sophisticated manual proofs. At extraction time, specifications and proofs are erased, and the remaining code enjoys a predictable translation to C. We prove that this translation preserves semantics and side-channel resistance. We provide a new compiler back-end from Low* to C and, to evaluate our approach, we implement and verify various cryptographic algorithms, constructions, and tools for a total of about 28,000 lines of code, specification and proof. We show that our Low* code delivers performance competitive with existing (unverified) C cryptographic libraries, suggesting our approach may be applicable to larger-scale low-level software.

cs.PL↗