arXiv subjects

Tanja Laske

Publications and source records attributed to Tanja Laske.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2024

UnPaSt: unsupervised patient stratification by biclustering of omics data

Unsupervised patient stratification is essential for disease subtype discovery, yet, despite growing evidence of molecular heterogeneity of non-oncological diseases, popular methods are benchmarked primarily using cancers with mutually exclusive molecular subtypes well-differentiated by numerous biomarkers. Evaluating 22 unsupervised methods, including clustering and biclustering, using simulated and real transcriptomics data revealed their inefficiency in scenarios with non-mutually exclusive subtypes or subtypes discriminated only by few biomarkers. To address these limitations and advance precision medicine, we developed UnPaSt, a novel biclustering algorithm for unsupervised patient stratification based on differentially expressed biclusters. UnPaSt outperformed widely used patient stratification approaches in the de novo identification of known subtypes of breast cancer and asthma. In addition, it detected many biologically insightful patterns across bulk transcriptomics, proteomics, single-cell, spatial transcriptomics, and multi-omics datasets, enabling a more nuanced and interpretable view of high-throughput data heterogeneity than traditionally used methods.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Privacy-Preserving Multi-Center Differential Protein Abundance Analysis with FedProt

Quantitative mass spectrometry has revolutionized proteomics by enabling simultaneous quantification of thousands of proteins. Pooling patient-derived data from multiple institutions enhances statistical power but raises significant privacy concerns. Here we introduce FedProt, the first privacy-preserving tool for collaborative differential protein abundance analysis of distributed data, which utilizes federated learning and additive secret sharing. In the absence of a multicenter patient-derived dataset for evaluation, we created two, one at five centers from LFQ E.coli experiments and one at three centers from TMT human serum. Evaluations using these datasets confirm that FedProt achieves accuracy equivalent to DEqMS applied to pooled data, with completely negligible absolute differences no greater than $\text{$4 \times 10^{-12}$}$. In contrast, -log10(p-values) computed by the most accurate meta-analysis methods diverged from the centralized analysis results by up to 25-27. FedProt is available as a web tool with detailed documentation as a FeatureCloud App.

q-bio.QM↗