Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Tarciana L. Pereira

Publications and source records attributed to Tarciana L. Pereira.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

J- and MJ-Type Tests for Non-Nested Parametric Survival Models with a Cure Fraction: A Score Test Approach

We propose specification tests for discriminating among non-nested parametric survival models with a cure fraction, focusing on models that differ only in their baseline distributions. The proposed approach augments the null log-likelihood with information from competing models and applies a score test to assess whether the additional information is redundant. Because the test relies only on restricted maximum likelihood estimates, it avoids fitting augmented models. For two competing models, the score statistic reduces to a quadratic form in the sample mean of the individual log-likelihood differences. We show that its signed square root coincides with Vuong's test statistic, although our framework differs in three important respects: it tests the specific null hypothesis that a given model is the true data-generating process, it uses an unsigned statistic that extends naturally to $M \ge 2$ competing models, and it estimates the Kullback-Leibler bias by parametric bootstrap. The resulting MJ statistic combines the individual J tests to assess the global null hypothesis that at least one candidate model is correctly specified, while also providing a model-selection criterion.

stat.ME↗

Bootstrap Bartlett correction in inflated beta regression

The inflated beta regression model aims to enable the modeling of responses in the intervals $(0,1]$, $[0,1)$ or $[0,1]$. In this model, hypothesis testing is often performed based on the likelihood ratio statistic. The critical values are obtained from asymptotic approximations, which may lead to distortions of size in small samples. In this sense, this paper proposes the bootstrap Bartlett correction to the statistic of likelihood ratio in the inflated beta regression model. The proposed adjustment only requires a simple Monte Carlo simulation. Through extensive Monte Carlo simulations the finite sample performance (size and power) of the proposed corrected test is compared to the usual likelihood ratio test and the Skovgaard adjustment already proposed in the literature. The numerical results evidence that inference based on the proposed correction is much more reliable than that based on the usual likelihood ratio statistics and the Skovgaard adjustment. At the end of the work, an application to real data is also presented.

stat.ME↗