Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Tareq Aljurf

Publications and source records attributed to Tareq Aljurf.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Real-World Adoption, Use, and Governance of an LLM-Based Electronic Health Record Search and Synthesis Platform

We evaluated the longitudinal adoption and use of Scout, an electronic health record-integrated large language model platform that provides cited search and synthesis of patient records, during staged deployment across a multi-hospital academic health system. Over 11 months, 2,635 users completed 80,465 tasks. 1,768 clinical users initiated use within the first 29 days of system-wide launch, which included a required training. Daily initiation increased 21.2-fold at launch, from 2.9 to 61.0 users per day. Of the 495 users who initiated use during the launch week, 310 did so in the first two days. Use spanned more than 20 recorded specialty categories, five care-practitioner roles, and 46,485 distinct prompts involving retrieval, synthesis, extraction, evaluation, and drafting, with 752 tasks saved for reuse. Among care practitioners who completed the required course, 77.9% went on to use Scout, with a median of 1.7 days after course completion. The highest-intensity user quintile accounted for 59.0% of tasks and 61.9% of tokens. Exploratory prompt analysis showed use across retrieval, synthesis, extraction, evaluation, and note-drafting. These findings suggest that rapid, broad adoption requires clinician-led task design and evaluation, traceable governance proportional to reach, centralized capacity planning and user support, and training integrated with access.

cs.CY↗

A Randomized Controlled Trial and Pilot of Scout: an LLM-Based EHR Search and Synthesis Platform

Clinical documentation and data retrieval within Electronic Health Records (EHRs) contribute substantially to clinician workload and burnout. To address this, we developed Scout, an LLM-based EHR search and synthesis platform that enables clinicians to query EHR data using natural language. Each response includes citations linking each claim to the original data source, facilitating easy verification of generated content. We conducted a prospective randomized, evaluator-blinded crossover trial across seven clinical specialties (20 participants, 200 structured cases). Participants completed realistic clinical tasks using either Scout or the EHR alone, with outcomes including time to completion, NASA Task Load Index workload scores, and blinded expert adjudication of accuracy, completeness, and relevance. Scout reduced task completion time by 37.6% and significantly decreased perceived workload, with the largest reductions in mental demand, effort, and temporal demand. Non-inferiority analyses showed that tasks completed with Scout maintained accuracy, completeness, and relevance relative to tasks completed with the EHR-only. A concurrent pilot deployment across over 200 users and more than 20 specialties generated over 6,600 interactions in three months, revealing diverse clinical and administrative use cases. Automated evaluation using an LLM-as-judge framework identified errors at low rates. Subsequent manual review of a subset of outputs revealed that most claims flagged by the automated judge as errors were in fact supported by the patient chart, demonstrating the importance of human validation. These findings provide early trial-based evidence that LLM-powered EHR tools can meaningfully reduce clinical and administrative workloads while maintaining output quality.

cs.IR↗