arXiv subjects

Teemu Pihkakoski

Publications and source records attributed to Teemu Pihkakoski.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Evaluating the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithms for QUBO problems Across Quantum Hardware Platforms: Performance Analysis, Challenges, and Strategies

Quantum computers are expected to offer advantages in solving optimization problems challenging for classical computers. Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems represent an important class of problems with relevance in finance and logistics. The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a prominent candidate for solving QUBO problems on near-term quantum devices. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of both the standard QAOA and the adaptive derivative assembled problem tailored QAOA (ADAPT-QAOA) to solve QUBO problems of varying sizes and hardnesses for financial feature selection problems. Our main observation is that ADAPT-QAOA achieves substantially higher approximation ratios than standard QAOA for harder feature-selection problems (α = 0.6) with statistically significant improvements observed for problem sizes n = 6 and 14. However, the standard QAOA remains competitive for simpler problems. Additionally, we evaluate the practical feasibility and limitations of QAOA through a hardware-aware scaling analysis based on the real-device calibration data for various hardware platforms. We estimate that standard QAOA implementation on superconducting quantum computers provides a shorter time-to-solution compared to trapped-ion devices, while trapped-ion devices yield more favorable error rates. Our findings provide a comprehensive overview of the challenges, trade-offs, and strategies for deploying QAOA-based methods on near-term quantum hardware.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

C2|Q>: A Robust Framework for Bridging Classical and Quantum Software Development -- RCR Report

This is the Replicated Computational Results (RCR) Report for the paper C2|Q>: A Robust Framework for Bridging Classical and Quantum Software Development. The paper introduces a modular, hardware-agnostic framework that translates classical problem specifications-Python code or structured JSON-into executable quantum programs across ten problem families and multiple hardware backends. We release the framework source code on GitHub at https://github.com/C2-Q/C2Q, a pretrained parser model on Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/records/19061125, evaluation data in a separate Zenodo record at https://zenodo.org/records/17071667, and a PyPI package at https://pypi.org/project/c2q-framework/ for lightweight CLI and API use. Experiment 1 is supported through a released pretrained model and training notebook, while Experiments 2 and 3 are directly executable via documented make targets. This report describes the artifact structure, setup instructions, and the mapping from each execution route to the corresponding experiment.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

C2|Q>: A Robust Framework for Bridging Classical and Quantum Software Development

QSE is emerging as a critical discipline to make quantum computing accessible to a broader developer community; however, most quantum development environments still require developers to engage with low-level details across the software stack - including problem encoding, circuit construction, algorithm configuration, hardware selection, and result interpretation - making them difficult for classical software engineers to use. To bridge this gap, we present C2|Q>, a hardware-agnostic quantum software development framework that translates specific types of classical specifications into quantum-executable programs while preserving methodological rigor. The framework applies modular SE principles by classifying the workflow into three core modules: an encoder that classifies problems, produces Quantum-Compatible Formats, and constructs quantum circuits, a deployment module that generates circuits and recommends hardware based on fidelity, runtime, and cost, and a decoder that interprets quantum outputs into classical solutions. In evaluation, the encoder module achieved a 93.8% completion rate, the hardware recommendation module consistently selected the appropriate quantum devices for workloads scaling up to 56 qubits. End-to-end experiments on 434 Python programs and 100 JSON problem instances show that the full C2|Q> workflow executes reliably on simulators and can be deployed successfully on representative real quantum hardware, with empirical runs limited to small- and medium-sized instances consistent with current NISQ capabilities. These results indicate that C2|Q> lowers the entry barrier to quantum software development by providing a reproducible, extensible toolchain that connects classical specifications to quantum execution. The open-source implementation of C2|Q> is available at https://github.com/C2-Q/C2Q and as a Python package at https://pypi.org/project/c2q-framework/.

cs.SE↗