arXiv subjects

Thanapong Intharah

Publications and source records attributed to Thanapong Intharah.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

USB Gym: A Gymnasium Testbed for Closed-Loop Ultrasound View Matching

Background and Objective: Our main goal is ultrasound guidance: moving a probe until its image matches a target view. Published methods for each part of a guide are evaluated in separate simulators. We asked whether these methods, combined into one guide, are good enough. Methods: We built USB Gym, a testbed whose standard engine simulates ultrasound from public patient CT, with a network drawing organ textures from CT labels. Its guide has three replaceable parts (slots), an organ segmenter, a controller and a reward, which received 20 published methods, each run on the same 60 episodes of six held-out patients. In each slot, a published method replaced ours only if detectably better on these patients. The better of this combination and our original guide on 20 new CTs is the benchmark baseline. A pose oracle, reading the exact probe pose available only in simulation, set the reference. The results below are exploratory. Results: On these CTs, the probe started on average 16.0 mm from the target view; the pose oracle brought it to 1.5 mm. Of the results known when the combination was fixed, only an image-similarity reward (SSIM) was slightly but detectably better, so the combination was our guide with that reward. This combination was the benchmark baseline, ending at 13.7 mm (16% of the oracle's progress). Conclusions: Combining untuned published methods with ours did not guide the probe near the target view; the task remains under-explored. The testbed accepts new methods; no guide was tested on hardware.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Mix and Match: Context Pairing for Scalable Topic-Controlled Educational Summarisation

Topic-controlled summarisation enables users to generate summaries focused on specific aspects of source documents. This paper investigates a data augmentation strategy for training small language models (sLMs) to perform topic-controlled summarisation. We propose a pairwise data augmentation method that combines contexts from different documents to create contrastive training examples, enabling models to learn the relationship between topics and summaries more effectively. Using the SciTLDR dataset enriched with Wikipedia-derived topics, we systematically evaluate how augmentation scale affects model performance. Results show consistent improvements in win rate and semantic alignment as the augmentation scale increases, while the amount of real training data remains fixed. Consequently, a T5-base model trained with our augmentation approach achieves competitive performance relative to larger models, despite using significantly fewer parameters and substantially fewer real training examples.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2017

Help, It Looks Confusing: GUI Task Automation Through Demonstration and Follow-up Questions

Non-programming users should be able to create their own customized scripts to perform computer-based tasks for them, just by demonstrating to the machine how it's done. To that end, we develop a system prototype which learns-by-demonstration called HILC (Help, It Looks Confusing). Users train HILC to synthesize a task script by demonstrating the task, which produces the needed screenshots and their corresponding mouse-keyboard signals. After the demonstration, the user answers follow-up questions. We propose a user-in-the-loop framework that learns to generate scripts of actions performed on visible elements of graphical applications. While pure programming-by-demonstration is still unrealistic, we use quantitative and qualitative experiments to show that non-programming users are willing and effective at answering follow-up queries posed by our system. Our models of events and appearance are surprisingly simple, but are combined effectively to cope with varying amounts of supervision. The best available baseline, Sikuli Slides, struggled with the majority of the tests in our user study experiments. The prototype with our proposed approach successfully helped users accomplish simple linear tasks, complicated tasks (monitoring, looping, and mixed), and tasks that span across multiple executables. Even when both systems could ultimately perform a task, ours was trained and refined by the user in less time.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2015

Context Tricks for Cheap Semantic Segmentation

Accurate semantic labeling of image pixels is difficult because intra-class variability is often greater than inter-class variability. In turn, fast semantic segmentation is hard because accurate models are usually too complicated to also run quickly at test-time. Our experience with building and running semantic segmentation systems has also shown a reasonably obvious bottleneck on model complexity, imposed by small training datasets. We therefore propose two simple complementary strategies that leverage context to give better semantic segmentation, while scaling up or down to train on different-sized datasets. As easy modifications for existing semantic segmentation algorithms, we introduce Decorrelated Semantic Texton Forests, and the Context Sensitive Image Level Prior. The proposed modifications are tested using a Semantic Texton Forest (STF) system, and the modifications are validated on two standard benchmark datasets, MSRC-21 and PascalVOC-2010. In Python based comparisons, our system is insignificantly slower than STF at test-time, yet produces superior semantic segmentations overall, with just push-button training.

cs.CV↗