arXiv subjects

Theo Damoulas

Publications and source records attributed to Theo Damoulas.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2019

Posterior Inference for Sparse Hierarchical Non-stationary Models

Gaussian processes are valuable tools for non-parametric modelling, where typically an assumption of stationarity is employed. While removing this assumption can improve prediction, fitting such models is challenging. In this work, hierarchical models are constructed based on Gaussian Markov random fields with stochastic spatially varying parameters. Importantly, this allows for non-stationarity while also addressing the computational burden through a sparse banded representation of the precision matrix. In this setting, efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling is challenging due to the strong coupling a posteriori of the parameters and hyperparameters. We develop and compare three adaptive MCMC schemes and make use of banded matrix operations for faster inference. Furthermore, a novel extension to multi-dimensional settings is proposed through an additive structure that retains the flexibility and scalability of the model, while also inheriting interpretability from the additive approach. A thorough assessment of the efficiency and accuracy of the methods in nonstationary settings is presented for both simulated experiments and a computer emulation problem.

stat.CO↗

arXiv2018

Can We Assess Mental Health through Social Media and Smart Devices? Addressing Bias in Methodology and Evaluation

Predicting mental health from smartphone and social media data on a longitudinal basis has recently attracted great interest, with very promising results being reported across many studies. Such approaches have the potential to revolutionise mental health assessment, if their development and evaluation follows a real world deployment setting. In this work we take a closer look at state-of-the-art approaches, using different mental health datasets and indicators, different feature sources and multiple simulations, in order to assess their ability to generalise. We demonstrate that under a pragmatic evaluation framework, none of the approaches deliver or even approach the reported performances. In fact, we show that current state-of-the-art approaches can barely outperform the most naïve baselines in the real-world setting, posing serious questions not only about their deployment ability, but also about the contribution of the derived features for the mental health assessment task and how to make better use of such data in the future.

cs.CY↗