arXiv subjects

Thomas G. Jenkins

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas G. Jenkins.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Pressure dependence of magnetron sputtering: 2D-RZ particle-in-cell and 1D fluid modeling

We reproduce the consistently-seen experimental voltage versus pressure (V-p) dependence of DC magnetron sputtering (DCMS) with 2D-RZ particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation. Informed by PIC simulation, we develop a steady-state, 1D-axial fluid model of the sheath and presheath that also reproduces this V-p dependence. The V-p dependence is the relationship between the steady-state voltage needed to maintain a constant discharge current and the neutral gas pressure. V-p dependence is fundamental to device performance, but has not previously been reproduced with simulation or satisfactorily explained. We find that the decrease in voltage with increasing pressure is not due to electron recapture at the cathode. Rather, the constant current dictates a constant global ionization rate, so the voltage decrease compensates for the increase in neutral gas density by lowering the energy of the plasma electrons, which decreases their ionization probability. The PIC simulations also reveal that the presheath and bulk plasma are unaffected by the electron reflection coefficient at the cathode; the only effect of increasing reflection is a reduction in the sheath voltage and width. In addition to the potential structure, we explore how pressure affects the plasma density, particle drifts, and particle energy distributions.

physics.plasm-ph↗

arXiv2025

Modeling the Role of Secondary Electron Emission in Direct Current Magnetron Sputtering using Explicit Energy-Conserving Particle-in-Cell Methods

We present results from a fully kinetic particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation of direct current magnetron sputtering (dcMS) in a 2D cylindrically symmetric geometry. The particle-in-cell model assumes an electrostatic approximation and includes the Monte Carlo collision (MCC) method to model collisions between electrons and the neutral gas. A newly-implemented explicit energy-conserving PIC algorithm (EC-PIC) is also exercised by the model and results are compared with the standard momentum conserving PIC (MC-PIC) method. We use these simulation tools to examine how changes in secondary electron yield (SEY) and the external circuit impact the steady-state current, voltage, and plasma density of dcMS discharges. We show that in general, higher SEY and lower external resistance values lead to larger currents, smaller voltages, and larger plasma densities. We demonstrate that EC-PIC is superior to MC-PIC as the plasma current and density increase due to the improved numerical stability provided by EC-PIC.

physics.plasm-ph↗

arXiv2022

Accelerated Steady-State Electrostatic Particle-in-Cell Simulation of Langmuir Probes

First-principles particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation is a powerful tool for understanding plasma behavior, but this power often comes at great computational expense. Artificially reducing the ion/electron mass ratio is a time-honored practice to reduce simulation costs. Usually, this is a severe approximation. However, for steady-state collisionless, electrostatic (Vlasov-Poisson) systems, the solution with reduced mass ratio can be scaled to the solution for the real mass ratio, with no approximation. This 'scaled mass' method, which works with already-existing PIC codes, can reduce the computation time for a large class of electrostatic PIC simulations by the square root of the mass ratio. The particle distributions of the resulting steady state must be trivially rescaled to yield the true distributions, but the self-consistent electrostatic field is independent of the mass ratio. This method is equivalent to 'numerical timestepping,' an approach that evolves electron and ion populations with different timesteps. Numerical timestepping can be viewed as a special case of the speed-limited PIC (SLPIC) method, which is not restricted to steady-state phenomena. Although the scaled-mass approach is simplest, numerical timestepping and SLPIC more easily generalize to include other effects, such as collisions. The equivalence of these new approaches is demonstrated by applying them to simulate a cylindrical Langmuir probe in electron-argon plasma, speeding up simulation by two orders of magnitude. Methods such as SLPIC can therefore play an invaluable role in interpreting probe measurements by including geometric effects, collisions, secondary emission, and non-Maxwellian distributions.

physics.plasm-ph↗

arXiv2021

Dispersion and the Speed-Limited Particle-in-Cell Algorithm

This paper discusses temporally continuous and discrete forms of the speed-limited particle-in-cell (SLPIC) method first treated by Werner et al. [Phys. Plasmas 25, 123512 (2018)]. The dispersion relation for a 1D1V electrostatic plasma whose fast particles are speed-limited is derived and analyzed. By examining the normal modes of this dispersion relation, we show that the imposed speed-limiting substantially reduces the frequency of fast electron plasma oscillations while preserving the correct physics of lower-frequency plasma dynamics (e.g. ion acoustic wave dispersion and damping). We then demonstrate how the timestep constraints of conventional electrostatic particle-in-cell methods are relaxed by the speed-limiting approach, thus enabling larger timesteps and faster simulations. These results indicate that the SLPIC method is a fast, accurate, and powerful technique for modeling plasmas wherein electron kinetic behavior is nontrivial (such that a fluid/Boltzmann representation for electrons is inadequate) but evolution is on ion timescales.

physics.plasm-ph↗

arXiv2021

Computing the Paschen curve for argon with speed-limited particle-in-cell simulation

Upon inclusion of collisions, the speed-limited particle-in-cell (SLPIC) simulation method successfully computed the Paschen curve for argon. The simulations modelled an electron cascade across an argon-filled capacitor, including electron-neutral ionization, electron-neutral elastic collisions, electron-neutral excitation, and ion-induced secondary-electron emission. In electrical breakdown, the timescale difference between ion and electron motion makes traditional particle-in-cell (PIC) methods computationally slow. To decrease this timescale difference and speed up computation, we used SLPIC, a time-domain algorithm that limits the speed of the fastest electrons in the simulation. The SLPIC algorithm facilitates a straightforward, fully-kinetic treatment of dynamics, secondary emission, and collisions. SLPIC was as accurate as PIC, but ran up to 200 times faster. SLPIC accurately computed the Paschen curve for argon over three orders of magnitude in pressure.

physics.plasm-ph↗

arXiv2019

Speeding Up Simulations By Slowing Down Particles: Speed-Limited Particle-In-Cell Simulation

Based on the particle-in-cell (PIC) plasma simulation method, the speed-limited PIC (SLPIC) method delivers faster kinetic plasma simulation in cases where the particle distributions evolve slowly compared with the maximum stable PIC timestep. SLPIC thus offers more feasible, fully kinetic simulation in regimes that historically have required fluid approaches, such as magnetohydrodynamic (MHD), two-fluid, or Boltzmann electron treatments. In particular, SLPIC allows an explicit time advance with steps much larger than the inverse plasma frequency, avoiding the instability explicit PIC faces with large timesteps. SLPIC avoids this instability by slowing down fast particles (e.g., electrons) in a way that is rigorously underpinned by an approximate Vlasov equation; unlike MHD, two-fluid, and Boltzmann electron approaches, SLPIC does not fundamentally neglect any first-principles plasma physics, although the choices of grid cell size, timestep, and number of macroparticles per cell naturally limit the physical phenomena that can be accurately represented. SLPIC can be implemented with minor modifications of a standard PIC code and does not require an implicit time advance. It enables large timesteps in first-principles kinetic plasma simulation of appropriately slow phenomena, and it can handle many of the same complications as PIC, such as boundary conditions and collisions. In an argon plasma sheath test problem, a SLPIC simulation achieved a speed-up of a factor of 160 over the corresponding PIC simulation, without loss of accuracy.

physics.comp-ph↗