arXiv subjects

Thomas Studer

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas Studer.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Proof Theory and Interpolation for Sacchetti's Logics

We study the proof theory of Sacchetti's modal logics, a family of logics generalizing G\"odel--L\"ob provability logic by replacing transitivity with n-transitivity. We make three main contributions. First, we solve an open problem of Iwata by providing an effective cut elimination procedure for Sacchetti's logics. Second, building on this result, we introduce a new non-wellfounded sequent calculus for this family of logics with an improved subformula property. Third, using this calculus together with interpolation templates, we prove that Sacchetti's logics have the uniform Lyndon interpolation property, substantially strengthening previous interpolation results for these logics.

math.LO↗

arXiv2026

Uniform Lyndon Interpolation via Non-wellfounded Proofs

Non-wellfounded proof theory has been applied to establish uniform interpolation and Lyndon interpolation (separately) for multiple logics. However, it has not yet been used to prove uniform Lyndon interpolation. We close this gap by showing uniform Lyndon interpolation for the provability logic GLS. This logic was known to have uniform interpolation, but it was open whether it has uniform Lyndon interpolation (or at least non-uniform Lyndon interpolation). The methodology we provide is easy to adapt to other provability logics if a non-wellfounded sequent calculus is available for them. In addition, we offer an alternative proof of cut elimination for GLS via non-wellfounded proofs.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Proof Theory for Bimodal Provability Logics

We provide the first (non-labelled) sequent calculi for bimodal provability logics with "usual" provability predicates. In particular, we introduce calculi for the logics CS, CSM and ER. Additionally, we present non-wellfounded versions of our calculi, and use them to establish a cut-elimination procedure. Finally, we prove the first interpolation results for these logics showing that they all enjoy the uniform Lyndon interpolation property.

math.LO↗

arXiv2026

Simplicial Belief

Recently, much work has been carried out to study simplicial interpretations of modal logic. While notions of (distributed) knowledge have been well investigated in this context, it has been open how to model belief in simplicial models. We introduce polychromatic simplicial complexes, which naturally impose a plausibility relation on states. From this, we can define various notions of belief.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Hypergraph Semantics for Doxastic Logics

Simplicial models have become a crucial tool for studying distributed computing. These models, however, are only able to account for the knowledge, but not for the beliefs of agents. We present a new semantics for logics of belief. Our semantics is based on directed hypergraphs, a generalization of ordinary directed graphs in which edges are able to connect more than two vertices. Directed hypergraph models preserve the characteristic features of simplicial models for epistemic logic, while also being able to account for the beliefs of agents. We provide systems of both consistent belief and merely introspective belief. The completeness of our axiomatizations is established by the construction of canonical hypergraph models. We also present direct conversions between doxastic Kripke models and directed hypergraph models.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Uniform interpolation for interpretability logic

We present a proof-theoretical study of the interpretability logic IL, providing a wellfounded and a non-wellfounded sequent calculus for IL. The non-wellfounded calculus is used to establish a cut elimination argument for both calculi. In addition, we show that the non-wellfounded proof theory of IL is well-behaved, i.e., that cyclic proofs suffice. This makes it possible to prove uniform interpolation for IL. As a corollary we also provide a proof of uniform interpolation for the interpretability logic ILP.

math.LO↗

arXiv2025

Knowledge and Common Knowledge of Strategies

Most existing work on strategic reasoning simply adopts either an informed or an uninformed semantics. We propose a model where knowledge of strategies can be specified on a fine-grained level. In particular, it is possible to distinguish first-order, higher-order, and common knowledge of strategies. We illustrate the effect of higher-order knowledge of strategies by studying the game Hanabi. Further, we show that common knowledge of strategies is necessary to solve the consensus problem. Finally, we study the decidability of the model checking problem.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Coalgebraic proof translations for non-wellfounded proofs

Non-wellfounded proof theory results from allowing proofs of infinite height in proof theory. To guarantee that there is no vicious infinite reasoning, it is usual to add a constraint to the possible infinite paths appearing in a proof. Among these conditions, one of the simplest is enforcing that any infinite path goes through the premise of a rule infinitely often. Systems of this kind appear for modal logics with conversely well-founded frame conditions like GL or Grz. In this paper, we provide a uniform method to define proof translations for such systems, guaranteeing that the condition on infinite paths is preserved. In addition, as particular instance of our method, we establish cut-elimination for a non-wellfounded system of the logic Grz. Our proof relies only on the categorical definition of corecursion via coalgebras, while an earlier proof by Savateev and Shamkanov uses ultrametric spaces and a corresponding fixed point theorem.

math.LO↗

arXiv2025

Cut elimination for a non-wellfounded system for the master modality

In previous work we provided a method for eliminating cuts in non-wellfounded proofs with a local-progress condition, these being the simplest kind of non-wellfounded proofs. The method consisted of splitting the proof into nicely behaved fragments. This paper extends our method to proofs based on simple trace conditions. The main idea is to split the system with the trace condition into infinitely many local-progress calculi that together are equivalent to the original trace-based system. This provides a cut elimination method using only basic tools of structural proof theory and corecursion, which is needed due to the non-wellfounded character of proofs. We will employ the method to obtain syntactic cut elimination for $K^+$, a system of modal logic with the master modality.

math.LO↗

arXiv2024

Synergistic Knowledge

In formal epistemology, group knowledge is often modelled as the knowledge that the group would have, if the agents shared all their individual knowledge. However, this interpretation does not account for relations between agents. In this work, we propose the notion of synergistic knowledge which makes it possible to model those relationships.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Belief Expansion in Subset Models

Subset models provide a new semantics for justifcation logic. The main idea of subset models is that evidence terms are interpreted as sets of possible worlds. A term then justifies a formula if that formula is true in each world of the interpretation of the term. In this paper, we introduce a belief expansion operator for subset models. We study the main properties of the resulting logic as well as the differences to a previous (symbolic) approach to belief expansion in justification logic.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Impossible and Conflicting Obligations in Justification Logic

Different notions of the consistency of obligations collapse in standard deontic logic. In justification logics, which feature explicit reasons for obligations, the situation is different. Their strength depends on a constant specification and on the available set of operations for combining different reasons. We present different consistency principles in justification logic and compare their logical strength. We propose a novel semantics for which justification logics with the explicit version of axiom D, jd, are complete for arbitrary constant specifications. We then discuss the philosophical implications with regard to some deontic paradoxes.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

What Do You Care About: Inferring Values from Emotions

Observers can glean information from others' emotional expressions through the act of drawing inferences from another individual's emotional expressions. It is important for socially aware artificial systems to be capable of doing that as it can facilitate social interaction among agents, and is particularly important in human-robot interaction for supporting a more personalized treatment of users. In this short paper, we propose a methodology for developing a formal model that allows agents to infer another agent's values from her emotion expressions.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2023

Semirings of Evidence

In traditional justification logic, evidence terms have the syntactic form of polynomials, but they are not equipped with the corresponding algebraic structure. We present a novel semantic approach to justification logic that models evidence by a semiring. Hence justification terms can be interpreted as polynomial functions on that semiring. This provides an adequate semantics for evidence terms and clarifies the role of variables in justification logic. Moreover, the algebraic structure makes it possible to compute with evidence. Depending on the chosen semiring this can be used to model trust, probabilities, cost, etc. Last but not least the semiring approach seems promising for obtaining a realization procedure for modal fixed point logics.

math.LO↗

arXiv2023

Providing personalized Explanations: a Conversational Approach

The increasing applications of AI systems require personalized explanations for their behaviors to various stakeholders since the stakeholders may have various knowledge and backgrounds. In general, a conversation between explainers and explainees not only allows explainers to obtain the explainees' background, but also allows explainees to better understand the explanations. In this paper, we propose an approach for an explainer to communicate personalized explanations to an explainee through having consecutive conversations with the explainee. We prove that the conversation terminates due to the explainee's justification of the initial claim as long as there exists an explanation for the initial claim that the explainee understands and the explainer is aware of.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2023

The logic of temporal domination

In this short note, we are concerned with the fairness condition "A and B hold almost equally often", which is important for specifying and verifying the correctness of non-terminating processes and protocols. We introduce the logic of temporal domination, in which the above condition can be expressed. We present syntax and semantics of our logic and show that it is a proper extension of linear time temporal logic. In order to obtain this result, we rely on the corresponding result for k-counting automata.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

A logic of interactive proofs

We introduce the probabilistic two-agent justification logic IPJ, a logic in which we can reason about agents that perform interactive proofs. In order to study the growth rate of the probabilities in IPJ, we present a new method of parametrising IPJ over certain negligible functions. Further, our approach leads to a new notion of zero-knowledge proofs.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

Explicit non-normal modal logic

Faroldi argues that deontic modals are hyperintensional and thus traditional modal logic cannot provide an appropriate formalization of deontic situations. To overcome this issue, we introduce novel justification logics as hyperintensional analogues to non-normal modal logics. We establish soundness and completeness with respect to various models and we study the problem of realization.

cs.LO↗