arXiv subjects

Thomas Tienkamp

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas Tienkamp.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Improving Automatic Speech Recognition for Speakers Treated for Oral Cancer using Data Augmentation and LLM Error Correction

In recent years, the performance of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems has made considerable progress. Unfortunately, for people with speech impairments, such as people treated for oral cancer (OC), ASR performance is still lagging behind. The scarcity and variability of OC speech data makes development of ASR models for this type of speech difficult. In this work, we use data augmentation and large language model (LLM) error correction to mitigate this problem. We apply various augmentation techniques on a corpus of Dutch oral cancer speech to create synthetic data, and evaluate their effect on ASR performance. We finetune Whisper and Massively Multilingual Speech (MMS) models for each augmentation technique and observe, on average, an 8% relative decrease in Word Error Rate (WER) when including data created using text-to-speech (TTS). When employing LLMs for error correction, we see a further 21.4-26.2% relative decrease in WER for finetuned ASR models and a 10.0% relative decrease for non-finetuned models. Overall, we achieve a 40% relative WER decrease for Whisper and a 50% relative WER decrease for MMS, indicating that a combination of data augmentation and LLM correction is a viable strategy for the recognition of OC speech.

eess.AS↗

arXiv2026

PathBench: Speech Intelligibility Benchmark for Automatic Pathological Speech Assessment

Automatic speech intelligibility assessment is crucial for monitoring speech disorders and therapy efficacy. However, existing methods are difficult to compare: research is fragmented across private datasets with inconsistent protocols. We introduce PathBench, a unified benchmark for pathological speech assessment using public datasets. We compare reference-free, reference-text, and reference-audio methods across three protocols (Matched Content, Extended, and Full) representing how a linguist (controlled stimuli) versus machine learning specialist (maximum data) would approach the same data. We establish benchmark baselines across six datasets, enabling systematic evaluation of future methodological advances, and introduce Dual-ASR Articulatory Precision (DArtP), achieving the highest average correlation among reference-free methods.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

Towards explainable reference-free speech intelligibility evaluation of people with pathological speech

Objective assessment of speech that reflects meaningful changes in communication is crucial for clinical decision making and reproducible research. While existing objective assessments, particularly reference-based approaches, can capture intelligibility changes, they are often hindered by lack of explainability and the need for labor-intensive manual transcriptions. To address these issues, this work proposes the reference-free, explainable ASR Inconsistency Score. We evaluate this method on pathological speech in Dutch, Spanish and English, and compare its performance to a reference-based Word Error Rate (WER) baseline. Our results demonstrate that the ASR Inconsistency Score achieves a high correlation with expert perceptual ratings, with performance closely matching, and in one case exceeding, a standard reference-based Word Error Rate (WER) baseline.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2025

Relationship between objective and subjective perceptual measures of speech in individuals with head and neck cancer

Meaningful speech assessment is vital in clinical phonetics and therapy monitoring. This study examined the link between perceptual speech assessments and objective acoustic measures in a large head and neck cancer (HNC) dataset. Trained listeners provided ratings of intelligibility, articulation, voice quality, phonation, speech rate, nasality, and background noise on speech. Strong correlations were found between subjective intelligibility, articulation, and voice quality, likely due to a shared underlying cause of speech symptoms in our speaker population. Objective measures of intelligibility and speech rate aligned with their subjective counterpart. Our results suggest that a single intelligibility measure may be sufficient for the clinical monitoring of speakers treated for HNC using concomitant chemoradiation.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2025

Articulatory clarity and variability before and after surgery for tongue cancer

Surgical treatment for tongue cancer can negatively affect the mobility and musculature of the tongue, which can influence articulatory clarity and variability. In this study, we investigated articulatory clarity through the vowel articulation index (VAI) and variability through vowel formant dispersion (VFD). Using a sentence reading task, we assessed 11 individuals pre and six months post tongue cancer surgery, alongside 11 sex- and age matched typical speakers. Our results show that while the VAI was significantly smaller post-surgery compared to pre-surgery, there was no significant difference between patients and typical speakers at either time point. Post-surgery, speakers had higher VFD values for /i/ compared to pre-surgery and typical speakers, signalling higher variability. Taken together, our results suggest that while articulatory clarity remained within typical ranges following surgery for tongue cancer for the speakers in our study, articulatory variability increased.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

Quantifying the effect of speech pathology on automatic and human speaker verification

This study investigates how surgical intervention for speech pathology (specifically, as a result of oral cancer surgery) impacts the performance of an automatic speaker verification (ASV) system. Using two recently collected Dutch datasets with parallel pre and post-surgery audio from the same speaker, NKI-OC-VC and SPOKE, we assess the extent to which speech pathology influences ASV performance, and whether objective/subjective measures of speech severity are correlated with the performance. Finally, we carry out a perceptual study to compare judgements of ASV and human listeners. Our findings reveal that pathological speech negatively affects ASV performance, and the severity of the speech is negatively correlated with the performance. There is a moderate agreement in perceptual and objective scores of speaker similarity and severity, however, we could not clearly establish in the perceptual study, whether the same phenomenon also exists in human perception.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2022

Manipulation of oral cancer speech using neural articulatory synthesis

We present an articulatory synthesis framework for the synthesis and manipulation of oral cancer speech for clinical decision making and alleviation of patient stress. Objective and subjective evaluations demonstrate that the framework has acceptable naturalness and is worth further investigation. A subsequent subjective vowel and consonant identification experiment showed that the articulatory synthesis system can manipulate the articulatory trajectories so that the synthesised speech reproduces problems present in the ground truth oral cancer speech.

cs.SD↗