arXiv subjects

Thomas W Owen

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas W Owen.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2023

Aperiodic MEG abnormality in patients with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures

Aperiodic activity is a physiologically distinct component of the electrophysiological power spectrum. It is suggested to reflect the balance of excitation and inhibition in the brain, within selected frequency bands. However, the impact of recurrent seizures on aperiodic activity remains unknown, particularly in patients with severe bilateral seizures. Here, we hypothesised greater aperiodic abnormality in the epileptogenic zone, in patients with focal to bilateral tonic clonic (FBTC) seizures, and earlier age of seizure onset. Pre-operative magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings were acquired from 36 patients who achieved complete seizure freedom (Engel I outcome) post-surgical resection. A normative whole brain map of the aperiodic exponent was computed by averaging across subjects for each region in the hemisphere contralateral to the side of resection. Selected regions of interest were then tested for abnormality using deviations from the normative map in terms of z-scores. Resection masks drawn from postoperative structural imaging were used as an approximation of the epileptogenic zone. Patients with FBTC seizures had greater abnormality compared to patients with focal onset seizures alone in the resection volume (p=0.003, area under the ROC curve = 0.78 ). Earlier age of seizure onset was correlated with greater abnormality of the aperiodic exponent in the resection volume (correlation coefficient = -0.3, p= 0.04)) as well as the whole cortex (rho = -0.33, p=0.03). The abnormality of the aperiodic exponent did not significantly differ between the resected and non-resected regions of the brain. Abnormalities in aperiodic components relate to important clinical characteristics such as severity and age of seizure onset. This suggests the potential use of the aperiodic band power component as a marker for severity of epilepsy.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2023

Normative brain mapping using scalp EEG and potential clinical application

A normative electrographic activity map could be a powerful resource to understand normal brain function and identify abnormal activity. Here, we present a normative brain map using scalp EEG in terms of relative band power. In this exploratory study we investigate its temporal stability, its similarity to other imaging modalities, and explore a potential clinical application. We constructed scalp EEG normative maps of brain dynamics from 17 healthy controls using source-localised resting-state scalp recordings. We then correlated these maps with those acquired from MEG and intracranial EEG to investigate their similarity. Lastly, we use the normative maps to lateralise abnormal regions in epilepsy. Spatial patterns of band powers were broadly consistent with previous literature and stable across recordings. Scalp EEG normative maps were most similar to other modalities in the alpha band, and relatively similar across most bands. Towards a clinical application in epilepsy, we found abnormal temporal regions ipsilateral to the epileptogenic hemisphere. Scalp EEG relative band power normative maps are spatially stable across time, in keeping with MEG and intracranial EEG results. Normative mapping is feasible and may be potentially clinically useful in epilepsy. Future studies with larger sample sizes and high-density EEG are now required for validation.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2022

Normative brain mapping of interictal intracranial EEG to localise epileptogenic tissue

The identification of abnormal electrographic activity is important in a wide range of neurological disorders, including epilepsy for localising epileptogenic tissue. However, this identification may be challenging during non-seizure (interictal) periods, especially if abnormalities are subtle compared to the repertoire of possible healthy brain dynamics. Here, we investigate if such interictal abnormalities become more salient by quantitatively accounting for the range of healthy brain dynamics in a location-specific manner. To this end, we constructed a normative map of brain dynamics, in terms of relative band power, from interictal intracranial recordings from 234 subjects (21,598 electrode contacts). We then compared interictal recordings from 62 patients with epilepsy to the normative map to identify abnormal regions. We hypothesised that if the most abnormal regions were spared by surgery, then patients would be more likely to experience continued seizures post-operatively. We first confirmed that the spatial variations of band power in the normative map across brain regions were consistent with healthy variations reported in the literature. Second, when accounting for the normative variations, regions which were spared by surgery were more abnormal than those resected only in patients with persistent post-operative seizures (t=-3.6, p=0.0003), confirming our hypothesis. Third, we found that this effect discriminated patient outcomes (AUC=0.75 p=0.0003). Normative mapping is a well-established practice in neuroscientific research. Our study suggests that this approach is feasible to detect interictal abnormalities in intracranial EEG, and of potential clinical value to identify pathological tissue in epilepsy. Finally, we make our normative intracranial map publicly available to facilitate future investigations in epilepsy and beyond.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2020

Reliability and comparability of human brain structural covariance networks

Structural covariance analysis is a widely used structural MRI analysis method which characterises the co-relations of morphology between brain regions over a group of subjects. To our knowledge, little has been investigated in terms of the comparability of results between different data sets or the reliability of results over the same subjects in different rescan sessions, image resolutions, or FreeSurfer versions. In terms of comparability, our results show substantial differences in the structural covariance matrix between data sets of age- and sex-matched healthy human adults. These differences persist after site correction, they are exacerbated by low sample sizes, and they are most pronounced when using average cortical thickness as a morphological measure. Down-stream graph theoretic analyses further show statistically significant differences. In terms of reliability, substantial differences were also found when comparing repeated scan sessions of the same subjects, and image resolutions and FreeSurfer versions of the same image. We could further estimate the relative measurement error and showed that it is largest when using thickness. With simulated data, we argue that cortical thickness is least reliable because of larger relative measurement errors. Practically, we make the following recommendations (1) pooling subjects across sites into one group should be avoided, particularly if sites differ in image resolutions, demographics, or preprocessing; (2) surface area and volume should be preferred as morphological measures over cortical thickness; (3) a large number of subjects should be used to estimate structural covariance; (4) measurement error should be assessed where repeated measurements are available; (5) if combining sites is critical, univariate site-correction is insufficient, but error covariance should be explicitly measured and modelled.

q-bio.NC↗