Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Thomas Waschulzik

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas Waschulzik.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

When Black-Box Robot Policies Fail: Online Sensor Diagnosis and Repair with a Transparent Surrogate

Robot foundation models may generalize across tasks and embodiments, but their actions still depend on sensors that can fail. When the policy is frozen or inaccessible, can an external monitor diagnose and repair corrupted inputs without access to its internals? We test a structured surrogate that separates periodic gait from sensor-dependent corrections to guide input repair around a frozen locomotion policy. On simulated Go2, offline diagnosis raises walking success from 259/640 to 429/640 episodes; online repair reaches 382/640, with no triggers in 64 held-out fault-free episodes. A matched boosted-tree surrogate predicts clean actions similarly well but yields no detected repair improvement over no repair. Separate fits improve walking on Go1 and ANYmal C, although phase-aware gradients perform better. Evidence remains limited to one policy and a partly screened simulated fault suite; robot foundation model and hardware validation remain open.

cs.RO↗

Analyzing Training-Free Corruption Detection for Object Detection Datasets

Annotation errors are widespread in computer vision datasets and can significantly degrade the performance of systems trained on them, particularly in complex tasks such as object detection. Several approaches exist to identify annotation errors, including training-free feature-space methods which provide a fast and interpretable way to analyze annotations. However, the behavior on object detection annotations, which include semantic and spatial information, remains largely unexplored. In this work we analyze the applicability of feature-space-based approaches for detecting annotation errors in object detection datasets. By adapting an existing feature-space method, we show that such approaches reliably expose semantic mislabel, while positional errors remain difficult to detect. We evaluate this behavior across multiple pretrained embedding models, synthetic noise types (symmetric, asymmetric, and positional), and real-world annotation errors using VOC2012 and KITTI. All code and real-world corruptions are publicly available at the following repository: https://github.com/ ChristianSieberichs/BoundingBox\_corruption\_detection

cs.CV↗

ECS -- an Interactive Tool for Data Quality Assurance

With the increasing capabilities of machine learning systems and their potential use in safety-critical systems, ensuring high-quality data is becoming increasingly important. In this paper we present a novel approach for the assurance of data quality. For this purpose, the mathematical basics are first discussed and the approach is presented using multiple examples. This results in the detection of data points with potentially harmful properties for the use in safety-critical systems.

cs.LG↗

QI2 -- an Interactive Tool for Data Quality Assurance

The importance of high data quality is increasing with the growing impact and distribution of ML systems and big data. Also the planned AI Act from the European commission defines challenging legal requirements for data quality especially for the market introduction of safety relevant ML systems. In this paper we introduce a novel approach that supports the data quality assurance process of multiple data quality aspects. This approach enables the verification of quantitative data quality requirements. The concept and benefits are introduced and explained on small example data sets. How the method is applied is demonstrated on the well known MNIST data set based an handwritten digits.

cs.CY↗

Towards a safe MLOps Process for the Continuous Development and Safety Assurance of ML-based Systems in the Railway Domain

Traditional automation technologies alone are not sufficient to enable driverless operation of trains (called Grade of Automation (GoA) 4) on non-restricted infrastructure. The required perception tasks are nowadays realized using Machine Learning (ML) and thus need to be developed and deployed reliably and efficiently. One important aspect to achieve this is to use an MLOps process for tackling improved reproducibility, traceability, collaboration, and continuous adaptation of a driverless operation to changing conditions. MLOps mixes ML application development and operation (Ops) and enables high frequency software releases and continuous innovation based on the feedback from operations. In this paper, we outline a safe MLOps process for the continuous development and safety assurance of ML-based systems in the railway domain. It integrates system engineering, safety assurance, and the ML life-cycle in a comprehensive workflow. We present the individual stages of the process and their interactions. Moreover, we describe relevant challenges to automate the different stages of the safe MLOps process.

cs.SE↗