SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Tian Lyu

Publications and source records attributed to Tian Lyu.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Why Smaller Is Slower? Dimensional Misalignment in Compressed LLMs

Post-training compression reduces LLM parameter counts but often produces irregular tensor dimensions that degrade GPU performance -- a phenomenon we call \emph{dimensional misalignment}. We present a full-stack analysis tracing root causes at three levels: framework, library, and hardware. The key insight is that model inference becomes slower because the resulting dimensions are unfriendly with the GPU execution stack. For example, compressing Llama-3-8B with activation-aware singular value decomposition (ASVD) has 15\% fewer parameters yet runs no faster than the uncompressed baseline, because 95\% of its dimensions are misaligned. We propose \textbf{GAC} (GPU-Aligned Compression), a new compression paradigm that wraps any dimension-reducing compressor and re-selects hardware-aligned dimensions via multi-choice knapsack optimization under the same parameter budget. We evaluate GAC on Llama-3-8B with ASVD and LLM-Pruner, achieving 100\% alignment and recovering up to 1.5$\times$ speedup while preserving model quality.

cs.DC

RAP: KV-Cache Compression via RoPE-Aligned Pruning

Long-context inference in large language models (LLMs) is bottlenecked by the memory and compute of the key-value (KV) cache. Structured pruning is a direct way to shrink it: dropping the least useful channels of the W_k, W_v projection weights to reduce the output KV dimensions. However, modern LLMs apply Rotary Position Embedding (RoPE) after the QK projections, which rotates feature dimensions in pairs. Therefore, removing individual channels breaks these pairs, corrupting RoPE's positional semantics and rendering the pruned model unusable. We propose RoPE-Aligned Pruning (RAP), which constrains the pruning granularity to RoPE-aligned pairs rather than individual channels: removing whole pairs to keep the rotation intact. Our evaluation across Llama, Mistral, and Qwen models from 3B to 14B shows that RAP preserves accuracy at 30% KV compression (retain ratio \r{ho} = 0.7), far outperforms RoPE-blind channel pruning, stays near the strongest low-rank method at lower attention cost, and composes with orthogonal methods such as quantization.

cs.LG

When Fewer Layers Break More Chains: Layer Pruning Harms Test-Time Scaling in LLMs

Layer pruning has emerged as a widely adopted technique for improving the efficiency of large language models (LLMs). Although existing methods demonstrate strong performance retention on general knowledge tasks, their effect on long-chain reasoning, a more brittle yet crucial capability, remains largely unexplored. In this work, we study the impact of layer pruning on long-chain reasoning through the lens of test-time scaling, a key mechanism in modern LLMs that enables strong reasoning capacity by allocating more computation at inference time. With extensive experiments, we demonstrate that pruning even one or two layers can severely impair test-time scaling, with performance collapsing drastically on long reasoning benchmarks even when performance on knowledge-intensive and shallow reasoning tasks remains stable. Furthermore, we find that standard supervised fine-tuning remedies fail to recover test-time scaling once it has deteriorated. Through in-depth analyses, we identify the mechanisms underlying this fragility of test-time scaling and highlight the fundamental risks of applying layer pruning to reasoning-intensive LLMs. These findings call for a rethinking of layer pruning strategies and provide insights for developing methods that preserve the robustness of reasoning. We open-source the codebase in \href{https://github.com/keyu-wang-2002/Layer-Pruning-Harms-Inference-Scaling}{https://github.com/keyu-wang-2002/Layer-Pruning-Harms-Inference-Scaling}.

cs.LG