SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Tim Verdonck

Publications and source records attributed to Tim Verdonck.

38 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Outlyingness: why do outliers lie out?

Outlier detection is an inevitable step to most statistical data analyses. However, the mere detection of an outlying case does not always answer all scientific questions associated with that data point. Outlier detection techniques, classical and robust alike, will typically flag the entire case as outlying, or attribute a specific case weight to the entire case. In practice, particularly in high dimensional data, the outlier will most likely not be outlying along all of its variables, but just along a subset of them. If so, the scientific question why the case has been flagged as an outlier becomes of interest. In this article, a fast and efficient method is proposed to detect variables that contribute most to an outlier's outlyingness. Thereby, it helps the analyst understand why an outlier lies out. The approach pursued in this work is to estimate the univariate direction of maximal outlyingness. It is shown that the problem of estimating that direction can be rewritten as the normed solution of a classical least squares regression problem. Identifying the subset of variables contributing most to outlyingness, can thus be achieved by estimating the associated least squares problem in a sparse manner. From a practical perspective, sparse partial least squares (SPLS) regression, preferably by the fast sparse NIPALS (SNIPLS) algorithm, is suggested to tackle that problem. The proposed methodology is illustrated to perform well both on simulated data and real life examples.

stat.ME

Robust bootstrap procedures for the chain-ladder method

Insurers are faced with the challenge of estimating the future reserves needed to handle historic and outstanding claims that are not fully settled. A well-known and widely used technique is the chain-ladder method, which is a deterministic algorithm. To include a stochastic component one may apply generalized linear models to the run-off triangles based on past claims data. Analytical expressions for the standard deviation of the resulting reserve estimates are typically difficult to derive. A popular alternative approach to obtain inference is to use the bootstrap technique. However, the standard procedures are very sensitive to the possible presence of outliers. These atypical observations, deviating from the pattern of the majority of the data, may both inflate or deflate traditional reserve estimates and corresponding inference such as their standard errors. Even when paired with a robust chain-ladder method, classical bootstrap inference may break down. Therefore, we discuss and implement several robust bootstrap procedures in the claims reserving framework and we investigate and compare their performance on both simulated and real data. We also illustrate their use for obtaining the distribution of one year risk measures.

stat.ME