arXiv subjects

Timothé Albouy

Publications and source records attributed to Timothé Albouy.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

From Bracha to Coded MBRB: Benchmarking Byzantine Reliable Broadcast Implementations

Byzantine Reliable Broadcast (BRB) and Message-Adversary-Tolerant Byzantine Reliable Broadcast (MBRB) are reliable-dissemination abstractions for fault-tolerant distributed systems. Yet their operational behavior is shaped not only by specifications and asymptotic communication bounds, but also by serialization, cryptography, buffering, orchestration, deployment environment, and fault-injection semantics. This paper implements and evaluates Bracha [Information and Computation, 1987], AFRT by Albouy et al. [TCS, 2023], and Coded MBRB by Albouy et al. [OPODIS, 2024]. We implement the algorithms in a shared Go codebase with common orchestration, instrumentation, parser-based specification checks, fault injection, and an open-source reproducibility artifact. The evaluation uses single-shot broadcasts in the Shadow network simulator, native profiling, a Google Cloud Platform deployment, and a distributed FABRIC testbed, covering controlled experiments up to 30 nodes, payloads up to 40 MB, 92,190 runs, and 2,361,600 parser-checked entries. The results show that Coded MBRB reduces transmitted data and improves latency in the evaluated cloud setting for larger payloads, but shifts cost to cryptographic and coding computation. Bracha and AFRT incur lower CPU costs at smaller payloads, but their full-payload dissemination increases processing, allocation, and network costs as payloads grow. Across the tested configurations, the parser found no duplicate deliveries, conflicting deliveries, or deliveries of values different from the sender's payload. The paper contributes implementation-level evidence and an extensible artifact for benchmarking BRB and MBRB as executable distributed-system components, exposing bottlenecks and operational trade-offs that are hidden by algorithmic descriptions alone.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

On the Decidability of Distributed Tasks with Output Sets under Asynchrony and Any Number of Crashes

This paper studies the decidability of task problems, i.e., distributed problems expressed as sets of distributed tasks. Specifically, we introduce a new class of task problems called Set of Output Sets (SOS) problems. An SOS problem $Π_O$ is defined by a set $O$ (called SOS), and requires that the set of sets of distinct output values produced across all executions corresponds exactly to $O$. We then demonstrate that this class of problems is decidable: there is a procedure determining whether any SOS problem is solvable asynchronously under $f$ crashes. The decision rule is as follows. Every SOS problem is solvable when $f=0$. For $f > 0$, an SOS problem is solvable if and only if the graph $G=(O,\subset)$ is connected. In this graph, each vertex is an output set in $O$, and two vertices are linked by an edge whenever one output set includes the other. One of the surprising implications of our results is that, replacing validity by a completeness property (which guarantees that all output sets of size at most $k$ are produced), $k$-set agreement is solvable under any number of crashes $f \geq 0$ for $k>1$, and unsolvable under $f>0$ crashes only for $k=1$ (consensus). Finally, we study a novel family of problems called $d$-disagreement, which requires the system to always produce $d$ different output values, and we show that its implementability condition is related to the harmonic series.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Context Adaptive Cooperation

As shown by Reliable Broadcast and Consensus, cooperation among a set of independent computing entities (sequential processes) is a central issue in distributed computing. Considering $n$-process asynchronous message-passing systems where some processes can be Byzantine, this paper introduces a new cooperation abstraction denoted Context-Adaptive Cooperation (CAC). While Reliable Broadcast is a one-to-$n$ cooperation abstraction and Consensus is an $n$-to-$n$ cooperation abstraction, CAC is a $d$-to-$n$ cooperation abstraction where the parameter $d$ ($1\leq d\leq n$) depends on the run and remains unknown to the processes. Moreover, the correct processes accept the same set of $\ell$ pairs $\langle v,i\rangle$ ($v$ is the value proposed by $p_i$) from the $d$ proposer processes, where $1 \leq \ell \leq d$ and, as $d$, $\ell$ remains unknown to the processes (except in specific cases). Those $\ell$ values are accepted one at a time in different orders at each process. Furthermore, CAC provides the processes with an imperfect oracle that gives information about the values that they may accept in the future. In a very interesting way, the CAC abstraction is particularly efficient in favorable circumstances. To illustrate its practical use, the paper describes in detail two applications that benefit from the abstraction: a fast consensus implementation under low contention (named Cascading Consensus), and a novel naming problem.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

Tight Conditions for Binary-Output Tasks under Crashes

This paper explores necessary and sufficient system conditions to solve distributed tasks with binary outputs (\textit{i.e.}, tasks with output values in $\{0,1\}$). We focus on the distinct output sets of values a task can produce (intentionally disregarding validity and value multiplicity), considering that some processes may output no value. In a distributed system with $n$ processes, of which up to $t \leq n$ can crash, we provide a complete characterization of the tight conditions on $n$ and $t$ under which every class of tasks with binary outputs is solvable, for both synchronous and asynchronous systems. This output-set approach yields highly general results: it unifies multiple distributed computing problems, such as binary consensus and symmetry breaking, and it produces impossibility proofs that hold for stronger task formulations, including those that consider validity, account for value multiplicity, or move beyond binary outputs.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

Asynchronous BFT Asset Transfer: Quasi-Anonymous, Light, and Consensus-Free

This paper introduces a new asynchronous Byzantine-tolerant asset transfer system (cryptocurrency) with three noteworthy properties: quasi-anonymity, lightness, and consensus-freedom. Quasi-anonymity means no information is leaked regarding the receivers and amounts of the asset transfers. Lightness means that the underlying cryptographic schemes are \textit{succinct} (\textit{i.e.}, they produce short-sized and quickly verifiable proofs) and each process only stores its own transfers while keeping communication cost as low as possible. Consensus-freedom means the system does not rely on a total order of asset transfers. The proposed algorithm is the first asset transfer system that simultaneously fulfills all these properties in the presence of asynchrony and Byzantine processes. To obtain them, the paper adopts a modular approach combining a new distributed object called ``agreement proof'' and well-known techniques such as commitments, universal accumulators, and zero-knowledge proofs.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

AMECOS: A Modular Event-based Framework for Concurrent Object Specification

In this work, we introduce a modular framework for specifying distributed systems that we call AMECOS. Specifically, our framework departs from the traditional use of sequential specification, which presents limitations both on the specification expressiveness and implementation efficiency of inherently concurrent objects, as documented by Castañeda, Rajsbaum and Raynal in CACM 2023. Our framework focuses on the interactions between the various system components, specified as concurrent objects. Interactions are described with sequences of object events. This provides a modular way of specifying distributed systems and separates legality (object semantics) from other issues, such as consistency. We demonstrate the usability of our framework by (i) specifying various well-known concurrent objects, such as registers, shared memory, message-passing, reliable broadcast, and consensus, (ii) providing hierarchies of ordering semantics (namely, consistency hierarchy, memory hierarchy, and reliable broadcast hierarchy), and (iii) presenting a novel axiomatic proof of the impossibility of the well-known Consensus problem.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Near-Optimal Communication Byzantine Reliable Broadcast under a Message Adversary

We address the problem of Reliable Broadcast in asynchronous message-passing systems with $n$ nodes, of which up to $t$ are malicious (faulty), in addition to a message adversary that can drop some of the messages sent by correct (non-faulty) nodes. We present a Message-Adversary-Tolerant Byzantine Reliable Broadcast (MBRB) algorithm that communicates ${\cal O}(|m|+nκ)$ bits per node, where $|m|$ represents the length of the application message and $κ=Ω(\log n)$ is a security parameter. This communication complexity is optimal up to the parameter $κ$. This significantly improves upon the state-of-the-art MBRB solution (Albouy, Frey, Raynal, and Taïani, TCS 2023), which incurs communication of ${\cal O}(n|m|+n^2κ)$ bits per node. Our solution sends at most $4n^2$ messages overall, which is asymptotically optimal. Reduced communication is achieved by employing coding techniques that replace the need for all nodes to (re-)broadcast the entire application message $m$. Instead, nodes forward authenticated fragments of the encoding of $m$ using an erasure-correcting code. Under the cryptographic assumptions of threshold signatures and vector commitments, and assuming $n > 3t+2d$, where the adversary drops at most $d$ messages per broadcast, our algorithm allows at least $\ell = n - t - (1 + ε)d$ (for any arbitrarily low $ε> 0$) correct nodes to reconstruct $m$, despite missing fragments caused by the malicious nodes and the message adversary.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

A Modular Approach to Construct Signature-Free BRB Algorithms under a Message Adversary

This paper explores how reliable broadcast can be implemented without signatures when facing a dual adversary that can both corrupt processes and remove messages. More precisely, we consider an asynchronous $n$-process message-passing system in which up to $t_b$ processes are Byzantine and where, at the network level, for each message broadcast by a correct process, an adversary can prevent up to $t_m$ processes from receiving it (the integer $t_m$ defines the power of the message adversary). So, unlike previous works, this work considers that not only can computing entities be faulty (Byzantine processes), but, in addition, that the network can also lose messages. To this end, the paper adopts a modular strategy and first introduces a new basic communication abstraction denoted $k2\ell$-cast, which simplifies quorum engineering, and studies its properties in this new adversarial context. Then, the paper deconstructs existing signature-free Byzantine-tolerant asynchronous broadcast algorithms and, with the help of the $k2\ell$-cast communication abstraction, reconstructs versions of them that tolerate both Byzantine processes and message adversaries. Interestingly, these reconstructed algorithms are also more efficient than the Byzantine-tolerant-only algorithms from which they originate.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2023

Good-case Early-Stopping Latency of Synchronous Byzantine Reliable Broadcast: The Deterministic Case (Extended Version)

This paper considers the good-case latency of Byzantine Reliable Broadcast (BRB), i.e., the time taken by correct processes to deliver a message when the initial sender is correct. This time plays a crucial role in the performance of practical distributed systems. Although significant strides have been made in recent years on this question, progress has mainly focused on either asynchronous or randomized algorithms. By contrast, the good-case latency of deterministic synchronous BRB under a majority of Byzantine faults has been little studied. In particular, it was not known whether a goodcase latency below the worst-case bound of t + 1 rounds could be obtained. This work answers this open question positively and proposes a deterministic synchronous Byzantine reliable broadcast that achieves a good-case latency of max(2, t + 3 -- c) rounds, where t is the upper bound on the number of Byzantine processes and c the number of effectively correct processes.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2022

Asynchronous Byzantine Reliable Broadcast With a Message Adversary

This paper considers the problem of reliable broadcast in asynchronous authenticated systems, in which n processes communicate using signed messages and up to t processes may behave arbitrarily (Byzantine processes). In addition, for each message m broadcast by a correct (i.e., non-Byzantine) process, a message adversary may prevent up to d correct processes from receiving m. (This message adversary captures network failures such as transient disconnections, silent churn, or message losses.) Considering such a "double" adversarial context and assuming n > 3t + 2d, a reliable broadcast algorithm is presented. Interestingly, when there is no message adversary (i.e., d = 0), the algorithm terminates in two communication steps (so, in this case, this algorithm is optimal in terms of both Byzantine tolerance and time efficiency). It is then shown that the condition n > 3t + 2d is necessary for implementing reliable broadcast in the presence of both Byzantine processes and a message adversary (whether the underlying system is enriched with signatures or not).

cs.DC↗