Timothy McClure | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Improving PI-RADS Prediction and Prostate Cancer Detection from Multiparametric MRI with Anatomical Guidance

Accurate prediction of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores from multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) remains challenging, more so than clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection. Given the importance of lesion location in PI-RADS scoring, we evaluated whether incorporating prostate zonal masks improves PI-RADS prediction and csPCa detection across multiple architectures (3D ResNet-18, ResNet-50, and ViT) using a large-scale internal dataset. Anatomical guidance generally improved performance across architectures, with the best results achieved by ResNet-18 with 2-zone guidance for PI-RADS prediction (QWK = 0.511) and ResNet-50 with 5-zone guidance for csPCa detection (AUC = 0.809). Fine-tuned results on external datasets further demonstrated the benefits of anatomical guidance. Furthermore, models with anatomical guidance improved the utility of model-predicted PI-RADS scores for PI-RADS-based csPCa detection (positive defined as PI-RADS>=3). Combining model-predicted and expert-assigned PI-RADS scores significantly increased the AUC from 0.711 to 0.756 (p < 0.05), suggesting that AI-derived PI-RADS scores may provide complementary information to expert assessment for csPCa detection. Overall, our findings highlight the value of incorporating prostate zonal anatomy into deep learning-based prostate MRI assessment.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

AI-Based Detection of Temporal Changes in MR-Linac Images Acquired During Routine Prostate Radiotherapy

Purpose: To investigate whether an AI-based method can detect subtle inter-fraction changes in MR-Linac images acquired during radiotherapy and explore the broader potential of MRLinac imaging. Methods: This retrospective study included longitudinal 0.35T MR-Linac images from 761 patients. To identify temporal changes, we employed a deep learning model using temporal ordering via pairwise comparison, previously shown effective for longitudinal imaging studies. The model was trained using first-to-last fraction pairs (F1-FL) and all pairs (All-pairs). Performance was assessed using quantitative metrics (accuracy and AUC) and compared against a radiologist's performance. Qualitative evaluation was performed using saliency maps, which identify anatomical regions associated with temporal imaging changes. Results: The F1-FL model demonstrated high performance (AUC=0.99, accuracy=0.95) and outperformed the radiologist in temporal ordering task. The All-pairs model also showed high performance (AUC=0.97, accuracy=0.91). Regions contributing to predictions included the prostate, bladder, and pubic symphysis. The performance was correlated to fractional intervals and was reduced for non-radiation-exposed timepoints (Sim and F1), suggesting that observed changes may reflect both temporal variation and radiation exposure. Conclusion: MR-Linac imaging appears capable of capturing subtle changes during prostate radiotherapy that can be detected by AI models, even over approximately two-day intervals. The model's high performance, together with quantitative and qualitative analyses, supports a potential role for MR-Linac in clinical applications beyond image guidance.

eess.IV↗