Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Tiziano M. A. Müller

Publications and source records attributed to Tiziano M. A. Müller.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The UZH protocol: Separating errors and constructing improved CP2K basis sets and pseudopotentials

Reliable density-functional simulations require numerical settings whose residual errors are smaller than the chemical and materials trends being interpreted. In CP2K/Quickstep, this requirement is complicated by the joint use of atom-centered Gaussian basis sets and norm-conserving pseudopotentials: a code-to-code discrepancy usually contains both contributions. We present the UZH protocol, a closed-loop CP2K workflow that calibrates molecularly optimized Gaussian basis sets on small molecules, validates the resulting settings in unary-crystal equation-of-state benchmarks, identifies whether the limiting approximation is the Gaussian basis or the pseudopotential. The diagnosis is then used to revise the parameter files. The central diagnostic is a three-way comparison between production CP2K-GTH-UZH calculations, SIRIUS calculations using the same Goedecker--Teter--Hutter pseudopotential in a systematic plane-wave representation, and all-electron full-potential linearized augmented-plane-wave SIRIUS references. This construction decomposes the practical CP2K error into a Gaussian-basis component and a pseudopotential component. The protocol distinguishes basis-limited noble-gas and heavy-element cases from pseudopotential-limited transition-metal cases, guides targeted revisions with the CP2K basis and pseudopotential optimizers, and produces improved MOLOPT basis sets and GTH pseudopotentials as explicit outputs of the workflow. The UZH protocol is therefore constructive: it does not merely measure or reduce errors a posteriori, but allows turning verification outliers into validated CP2K parameter files for simulations across molecules and condensed phases.

physics.chem-ph↗

How to verify the precision of density-functional-theory implementations via reproducible and universal workflows

In the past decades many density-functional theory methods and codes adopting periodic boundary conditions have been developed and are now extensively used in condensed matter physics and materials science research. Only in 2016, however, their precision (i.e., to which extent properties computed with different codes agree among each other) was systematically assessed on elemental crystals: a first crucial step to evaluate the reliability of such computations. We discuss here general recommendations for verification studies aiming at further testing precision and transferability of density-functional-theory computational approaches and codes. We illustrate such recommendations using a greatly expanded protocol covering the whole periodic table from Z=1 to 96 and characterizing 10 prototypical cubic compounds for each element: 4 unaries and 6 oxides, spanning a wide range of coordination numbers and oxidation states. The primary outcome is a reference dataset of 960 equations of state cross-checked between two all-electron codes, then used to verify and improve nine pseudopotential-based approaches. Such effort is facilitated by deploying AiiDA common workflows that perform automatic input parameter selection, provide identical input/output interfaces across codes, and ensure full reproducibility. Finally, we discuss the extent to which the current results for total energies can be reused for different goals (e.g., obtaining formation energies).

cond-mat.mtrl-sci↗