arXiv subjects

Tom Baumeister

Publications and source records attributed to Tom Baumeister.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

TACO: A Toolsuite for the Verification of Threshold Automata

We present TACO, a toolsuite for the development and automatic verification of fault-tolerant and threshold-based distributed algorithms. Our toolsuite implements three approaches for model checking threshold automata in different decidable fragments known from the literature and two semi-decision procedures going beyond these decidable fragments. Moreover, TACO is a modular, extensible, and well-documented framework for developing algorithms and tools for threshold automata. We present important features, give an overview of the implemented algorithms, and evaluate their performance experimentally.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Parameterized Verification of Round-based Distributed Algorithms via Extended Threshold Automata

Threshold automata are a computational model that has proven to be versatile in modeling threshold-based distributed algorithms and enabling their completely automatic parameterized verification. We present novel techniques for the verification of threshold automata, based on well-structured transition systems, that allow us to extend the expressiveness of both the computational model and the specifications that can be verified. In particular, we extend the model to allow decrements and resets of shared variables, possibly on cycles, and the specifications to general coverability. While these extensions of the model in general lead to undecidability, our algorithms provide a semi-decision procedure. We demonstrate the benefit of our extensions by showing that we can model complex round-based algorithms such as the phase king consensus algorithm and the Red Belly Blockchain protocol (published in 2019), and verify them fully automatically for the first time.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2020

Explainable Reactive Synthesis

Reactive synthesis transforms a specification of a reactive system, given in a temporal logic, into an implementation. The main advantage of synthesis is that it is automatic. The main disadvantage is that the implementation is usually very difficult to understand. In this paper, we present a new synthesis process that explains the synthesized implementation to the user. The process starts with a simple version of the specification and a corresponding simple implementation. Then, desired properties are added one by one, and the corresponding transformations, repairing the implementation, are explained in terms of counterexample traces. We present SAT-based algorithms for the synthesis of repairs and explanations. The algorithms are evaluated on a range of examples including benchmarks taken from the SYNTCOMP competition.

cs.LO↗