arXiv subjects

Tom Friedetzky

Publications and source records attributed to Tom Friedetzky.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Counting in Population Protocols on Graphs

We consider the problem of counting the number of agents in a population protocol where the agents are connected by an underlying graph $G=(V,E)$ with $|V|=n$ nodes. In each step, a random scheduler selects an edge uniformly at random, and the incident nodes make a state transition. As per standard assumptions, agents are identical and anonymous, that is, have no identifiers. To break symmetry, in each interaction one of the agents is declared as the initiator uniformly at random. Our size counting protocol uses $\tilde O(n)$ states and stabilizes in $O( B(G) \cdot \log^2(n) + L(G) \cdot \log(n))$ interactions with high probability, where $B(G)$ is the broadcast time and $L(G)$ is the load balancing time. Our protocol is based on novel protocols for sampling independent random bits (given that the scheduler determines an initiator and responder) and approximating $\log n$ up to an additive error of $O(\log \log n)$ with high probability. The latter uses $O(poly\log(n))$ states and $O(B(G)\cdot\log^2 n)$ interactions. Both results may be of independent interest. The main protocol for exact counting requires the presence of a unique leader, the other two do not. None of the protocols requires any knowledge about the graph $G$. We conclude with impossibility results for terminating uniform population protocols that compute graph-size properties (like counting nodes or determining parity) with and without a leader.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

(Almost) Perfect Discrete Iterative Load Balancing

We consider discrete, iterative load balancing via matchings on arbitrary graphs. Initially each node holds a certain number of tokens, defining the load of the node, and the objective is to redistribute the tokens such that eventually each node has approximately the same number of tokens. We present results for a general class of simple local balancing schemes where the tokens are balanced via matchings. In each round the process averages the tokens of any two matched nodes. If the sum of their tokens is odd, the node to receive the one excess token is selected at random. Our class covers three popular models: in the matching model a new matching is generated randomly in each round, in the balancing circuit model a fixed sequence of matchings is applied periodically, and in the asynchronous model the load is balanced over a randomly chosen edge. We measure the quality of a load vector by its discrepancy, defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum load across all nodes. As our main result we show that with high probability our discrete balancing scheme reaches a discrepancy of $3$ in a number of rounds which asymptotically matches the spectral bound for continuous load balancing with fractional load. This result improves and tightens a long line of previous works, by not only achieving a small constant discrepancy (instead of a non-explicit, large constant) but also holding for arbitrary instead of regular graphs. The result also demonstrates that in the general model we consider, discrete load balancing is no harder than continuous load balancing.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

Balls and Bins and the Infinite Process with Random Deletions

We consider an infinite balls-into-bins process with deletions where in each discrete step $t$ a coin is tossed as to whether, with probability $\beta(t) \in (0,1)$, a new ball is allocated using the Greedy[2] strategy (which places the ball in the lower loaded of two bins sampled uniformly at random) or, with remaining probability $1-\beta(t)$, a ball is deleted from a non-empty bin chosen uniformly at random. Let $n$ be the number of bins and $m(t)$ the total load at time $t$. We are interested in bounding the discrepancy $x_{\max}(t) - m(t)/n$ (current maximum load relative to current average) and the overload $x_{\max}(t) - m_{\max}(t)/n$ (current maximum load relative to highest average observed so far). We prove that at an arbitrarily chosen time $t$ the total number of balls above the average is $O(n)$ and that the discrepancy is $ O(\log(n))$. For the discrepancy, we provide a matching lower bound. Furthermore we prove that at an arbitrarily chosen time $t$ the overload is $\log\log(n)+O(1)$. For "good" insertion probability sequences (in which the average load of time intervals with polynomial length increases in expectation) we show that even the discrepancy is bounded by $\log\log(n)+O(1)$. One of our main analytical tools is a layered induction, as per [ABKU99]. Since our model allows for rather more general scenarios than what was previously considered, the formal analysis requires some extra ingredients as well, in particular a detailed potential analysis. Furthermore, we simplify the setup by applying probabilistic couplings to obtain certain "recovery" properties, which eliminate much of the need for intricate and careful conditioning elsewhere in the analysis.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

A Space-Time Trade-off for Fast Self-Stabilizing Leader Election in Population Protocols

We consider the problem of self-stabilizing leader election in the population model by Angluin, Aspnes, Diamadi, Fischer, and Peralta (JDistComp '06). The population model is a well-established and powerful model for asynchronous, distributed computation with a large number of applications. For self-stabilizing leader election, the population of $n$ anonymous agents, interacting in uniformly random pairs, must stabilize with a single leader from any possible initial configuration. The focus of this paper is to develop time-efficient self-stabilizing protocols whilst minimizing the number of states. We present a parametrized protocol, which, for a suitable setting, achieves the asymptotically optimal time $O(\log n)$ using $2^{O(n^2\log n)}$ states (throughout the paper, ``time'' refers to ``parallel time'', i.e., the number of pairwise interactions divided by $n$). This is a significant improvement over the previously best protocol Sublinear-Time-SSR due to Burman, Chen, Chen, Doty, Nowak, Severson, and Xu (PODC '21), which requires $2^{O(n^{\log n}\log n)}$ states for the same time bound. In general, for $1\le r\le n/2$, our protocol requires $2^{O(r^2\log{n})}$ states and stabilizes in time $O((n\log{n})/r)$, w.h.p.; the above result is achieved for $r=\Theta(n)$. For $r=\log^2n$ our protocol requires only sub-linear time using only $2^{O(\log^3 n)}$ states, resolving an open problem stated in that paper. Sublinear-Time-SSR requires $O(\log n\cdot n^{1/(H+1)})$ time using $2^{\Theta(n^H) \cdot \log n}$ states for all $1\le H\le\Theta(\log n)$. Similar to previous works, it solves leader election by assigning a unique rank from $1$ through $n$ to each agent. The principal bottleneck for self-stabilizing ranking usually is to detect if there exist agents with the same rank. One of our main conceptual contributions is a novel technique for collision detection.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Payment Scheduling in the Interval Debt Model

The network-based study of financial systems has received considerable attention in recent years but has seldom explicitly incorporated the dynamic aspects of such systems. We consider this problem setting from the temporal point of view and introduce the Interval Debt Model (IDM) and some scheduling problems based on it, namely: Bankruptcy Minimization/Maximization, in which the aim is to produce a payment schedule with at most/at least a given number of bankruptcies; Perfect Scheduling, the special case of the minimization variant where the aim is to produce a schedule with no bankruptcies (that is, a perfect schedule); and Bailout Minimization, in which a financial authority must allocate a smallest possible bailout package to enable a perfect schedule. We show that each of these problems is NP-complete, in many cases even on very restricted input instances. On the positive side, we provide for Perfect Scheduling a polynomial-time algorithm on (rooted) out-trees although in contrast we prove NP-completeness on directed acyclic graphs, as well as on instances with a constant number of nodes (and hence also constant treewidth). When we allow non-integer payments, we show by a linear programming argument that the problem Bailout Minimization can be solved in polynomial time.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2020

Time-space Trade-offs in Population Protocols for the Majority Problem

Population protocols are a model for distributed computing that is focused on simplicity and robustness. A system of $n$ identical agents (finite state machines) performs a global task like electing a unique leader or determining the majority opinion when each agent has one of two opinions. Agents communicate in pairwise interactions with randomly assigned communication partners. Quality is measured in two ways: the number of interactions to complete the task and the number of states per agent. We present protocols for the majority problem that allow for a trade-off between these two measures. Compared to the only other trade-off result [Alistarh, Gelashvili, Vojnovic; PODC'15], we improve the number of interactions by almost a linear factor. Furthermore, our protocols can be made uniform (working correctly without any information on the population size $n$), yielding the first uniform majority protocols that stabilize in a subquadratic number of interactions.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2018

Simple Load Balancing

We consider the following load balancing process for $m$ tokens distributed arbitrarily among $n$ nodes connected by a complete graph: In each time step a pair of nodes is selected uniformly at random. Let $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ be their respective number of tokens. The two nodes exchange tokens such that they have $\lceil(\ell_1 + \ell_2)/2\rceil$ and $\lfloor(\ell_1 + \ell_2)/2\rfloor$ tokens, respectively. We provide a simple analysis showing that this process reaches almost perfect balance within $O(n\log{n} + n \logΔ)$ steps, where $Δ$ is the maximal initial load difference between any two nodes.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2018

A population protocol for exact majority with $O(\log^{5/3} n)$ stabilization time and asymptotically optimal number of states

A population protocol can be viewed as a sequence of pairwise interactions of $n$ agents (nodes). During one interaction, two agents selected uniformly at random update their states by applying a specified deterministic transition function. In a long run, the whole system should stabilize at the correct output property. The main performance objectives in designing population protocols are small number of states per agent and fast stabilization time. We present a fast population protocol for the exact-majority problem which uses $Θ(\log n)$ states (per agent) and stabilizes in $O(\log^{5/3} n)$ parallel time (i.e., $O(n\log^{5/3} n)$ interactions) in expectation and with high probability. Alistarh et al. [SODA 2018] showed that any exact-majority protocol which stabilizes in expected $O(n^{1-ε})$ parallel time, for any constant $ε> 0$, requires $Ω(\log n)$ states. They also showed an $O(\log^2 n)$-time protocol with $O(\log n)$ states, the currently fastest exact-majority protocol with polylogarithmic number of states. The standard design framework for majority protocols is based on $O(\log n)$ phases and requires that all nodes are well synchronized within each phase, leading naturally to upper bounds of the order of at least $\log^2 n$ because of $Θ(\log n)$ synchronization time per phase. We show how this framework can be tightened with {\em weak synchronization} to break the $O(\log^2 n)$ upper bound of previous protocols.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2017

Rapid Asynchronous Plurality Consensus

We consider distributed plurality consensus in a complete graph of size $n$ with $k$ initial opinions. We design an efficient and simple protocol in the asynchronous communication model that ensures that all nodes eventually agree on the initially most frequent opinion. In this model, each node is equipped with a random Poisson clock with parameter $λ=1$. Whenever a node's clock ticks, it samples some neighbors, uniformly at random and with replacement, and adjusts its opinion according to the sample. A prominent example is the so-called two-choices algorithm in the synchronous model, where in each round, every node chooses two neighbors uniformly at random, and if the two sampled opinions coincide, then that opinion is adopted. This protocol is very efficient and well-studied when $k=2$. If $k=O(n^\varepsilon)$ for some small $\varepsilon$, we show that it converges to the initial plurality opinion within $O(k \cdot \log{n})$ rounds, w.h.p., as long as the initial difference between the largest and second largest opinion is $Ω(\sqrt{n \log n})$. On the other side, we show that there are cases in which $Ω(k)$ rounds are needed, w.h.p. One can beat this lower bound in the synchronous model by combining the two-choices protocol with randomized broadcasting. Our main contribution is a non-trivial adaptation of this approach to the asynchronous model. If the support of the most frequent opinion is at least $(1+\varepsilon)$ times that of the second-most frequent one and $k=O(\exp(\log{n}/\log \log{n}))$, then our protocol achieves the best possible run time of $O(\log n)$, w.h.p. We relax full synchronicity by allowing $o(n)$ nodes to be poorly synchronized, and the well synchronized nodes are only required to be within a certain time difference from one another. We enforce this synchronicity by introducing a novel gadget into the protocol.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2016

Self-stabilizing Balls & Bins in Batches

A fundamental problem in distributed computing is the distribution of requests to a set of uniform servers without a centralized controller. Classically, such problems are modeled as static balls into bins processes, where $m$ balls (tasks) are to be distributed to $n$ bins (servers). In a seminal work, Azar et al. proposed the sequential strategy \greedy{d} for $n=m$. When thrown, a ball queries the load of $d$ random bins and is allocated to a least loaded of these. Azar et al. showed that $d=2$ yields an exponential improvement compared to $d=1$. Berenbrink et al. extended this to $m\gg n$, showing that the maximal load difference is independent of $m$ for $d=2$ (in contrast to $d=1$). We propose a new variant of an \emph{infinite} balls into bins process. Each round an expected number of $λn$ new balls arrive and are distributed (in parallel) to the bins. Each non-empty bin deletes one of its balls. This setting models a set of servers processing incoming requests, where clients can query a server's current load but receive no information about parallel requests. We study the \greedy{d} distribution scheme in this setting and show a strong self-stabilizing property: For \emph{any} arrival rate $λ=λ(n)<1$, the system load is time-invariant. Moreover, for \emph{any} (even super-exponential) round $t$, the maximum system load is (w.h.p.) $O(\frac{1}{1-λ}\cdot\log\frac{n}{1-λ})$ for $d=1$ and $O(\log\frac{n}{1-λ})$ for $d=2$. In particular, \greedy{2} has an exponentially smaller system load for high arrival rates.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2016

Plurality Consensus via Shuffling: Lessons Learned from Load Balancing

We consider \emph{plurality consensus} in a network of $n$ nodes. Initially, each node has one of $k$ opinions. The nodes execute a (randomized) distributed protocol to agree on the plurality opinion (the opinion initially supported by the most nodes). Nodes in such networks are often quite cheap and simple, and hence one seeks protocols that are not only fast but also simple and space efficient. Typically, protocols depend heavily on the employed communication mechanism, which ranges from sequential (only one pair of nodes communicates at any time) to fully parallel (all nodes communicate with all their neighbors at once) communication and everything in-between. We propose a framework to design protocols for a multitude of communication mechanisms. We introduce protocols that solve the plurality consensus problem and are with probability 1-o(1) both time and space efficient. Our protocols are based on an interesting relationship between plurality consensus and distributed load balancing. This relationship allows us to design protocols that generalize the state of the art for a large range of problem parameters. In particular, we obtain the same bounds as the recent result of Alistarh et al. (who consider only two opinions on a clique) using a much simpler protocol that generalizes naturally to general graphs and multiple opinions.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2012

Random walks which prefer unvisited edges. Exploring high girth even degree expanders in linear time

We consider a modified random walk which uses unvisited edges whenever possible, and makes a simple random walk otherwise. We call such a walk an edge-process. We assume there is a rule A, which tells the walk which unvisited edge to use whenever there is a choice. In the simplest case, A is a uniform random choice over unvisited edges incident with the current walk position. However we do not exclude arbitrary choices of rule A. For example, the rule could be determined on-line by an adversary, or could vary from vertex to vertex. For even degree expander graphs, of bounded maximum degree, we have the following result. Let G be an n vertex even degree expander graph, for which every vertex is in at least one vertex induced cycle of length L. Any edge-process on G has cover time (n+ (n log n)/L). This result is independent of the rule A used to select the order of the unvisited edges, which can be chosen on-line by an adversary. As an example, With high probability, random r-regular graphs, (r at least 4, even), are expanders for which L = Omega(log n). Thus, for almost all such graphs, the vertex cover time of the edge-process is Theta(n). This improves the vertex cover time of such graphs by a factor of log n, compared to the Omega(n log n) cover time of any weighted random walk.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2007

Distributed Selfish Load Balancing

Suppose that a set of $m$ tasks are to be shared as equally as possible amongst a set of $n$ resources. A game-theoretic mechanism to find a suitable allocation is to associate each task with a ``selfish agent'', and require each agent to select a resource, with the cost of a resource being the number of agents to select it. Agents would then be expected to migrate from overloaded to underloaded resources, until the allocation becomes balanced. Recent work has studied the question of how this can take place within a distributed setting in which agents migrate selfishly without any centralized control. In this paper we discuss a natural protocol for the agents which combines the following desirable features: It can be implemented in a strongly distributed setting, uses no central control, and has good convergence properties. For $m\gg n$, the system becomes approximately balanced (an $ε$-Nash equilibrium) in expected time $O(\log\log m)$. We show using a martingale technique that the process converges to a perfectly balanced allocation in expected time $O(\log\log m+n^4)$. We also give a lower bound of $Ω(\max\{\log\log m,n\})$ for the convergence time.

cs.GT↗