SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Tomasz Michalski

Publications and source records attributed to Tomasz Michalski.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

This looks like what? Challenges and Future Research Directions for Part-Prototype Models

The growing interest in eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has stimulated research on models with built-in interpretability, among which part-prototype models are particularly prominent. Part-Prototype Models (PPMs) classify inputs by comparing them to learned prototypes and provide human-understandable explanations of the form "this looks like that". Despite this intrinsic interpretability, PPMs have not yet emerged as a competitive alternative to post-hoc explanation methods. This survey reviews work published between 2019 and 2025 and derives a taxonomy of the challenges faced by current PPMs. The analysis reveals a diverse set of open problems. The main issue concerns the quality and number of learned prototypes. Further challenges include limited generalization across tasks and contexts, as well as methodological shortcomings such as non-standardized evaluation. Five broad research directions are identified: improving predictive performance, developing theoretically grounded architectures, establishing frameworks for human-AI collaboration, aligning models with human concepts, and defining robust metrics and benchmarks for evaluation. The survey aims to stimulate further research and promote intrinsically interpretable models for practical applications. A curated list of the surveyed papers is available at https://github.com/aix-group/ppm-survey.

cs.LG

Personalized Interpretability -- Interactive Alignment of Prototypical Parts Networks

Concept-based interpretable neural networks have gained significant attention due to their intuitive and easy-to-understand explanations based on case-based reasoning, such as "this bird looks like those sparrows". However, a major limitation is that these explanations may not always be comprehensible to users due to concept inconsistency, where multiple visual features are inappropriately mixed (e.g., a bird's head and wings treated as a single concept). This inconsistency breaks the alignment between model reasoning and human understanding. Furthermore, users have specific preferences for how concepts should look, yet current approaches provide no mechanism for incorporating their feedback. To address these issues, we introduce YoursProtoP, a novel interactive strategy that enables the personalization of prototypical parts - the visual concepts used by the model - according to user needs. By incorporating user supervision, YoursProtoP adapts and splits concepts used for both prediction and explanation to better match the user's preferences and understanding. Through experiments on both the synthetic FunnyBirds dataset and a real-world scenario using the CUB, CARS, and PETS datasets in a comprehensive user study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of YoursProtoP in achieving concept consistency without compromising the accuracy of the model.

cs.CV