SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Tomasz Penza

Publications and source records attributed to Tomasz Penza.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Semilattice sums of algebras and Mal'tsev products of varieties

The Mal'tsev product of two varieties of similar algebras is always a quasivariety. We consider the question of when this quasivariety is a variety. The main result asserts that if $\mathcal{V}$ is a strongly irregular variety with no nullary operations and at least one non-unary operation, and $\mathcal{S}$ is the variety, of the same type as $\mathcal{V}$, equivalent to the variety of semilattices, then the Mal'tsev product $\mathcal{V} \circ \mathcal{S}$ is a variety. It consists precisely of semilattice sums of algebras in $\mathcal{V}$. We derive an equational base for the product from an equational base for $\mathcal{V}$. However, if $\mathcal{V}$ is a regular variety, then the Mal'tsev product may not be a variety. We discuss various applications of the main result, and examine some detailed representations of algebras in $\mathcal{V} \circ \mathcal{S}$.

math.RA

Mal'tsev products of varieties, I

We investigate the Mal'tsev product $\mathcal{V} \circ \mathcal{W}$ of two varieties $\mathcal{V}$ and $\mathcal{W}$ of the same similarity type. Such a product is usually a quasivariety but not necessarily a variety. We give an equational base for the variety generated by $\mathcal{V} \circ \mathcal{W}$ in terms of identities satisfied in $\mathcal{V}$ and $\mathcal{W}$. Then the main result provides a new sufficient condition for $\mathcal{V} \circ \mathcal{W}$ to be a variety: If $\mathcal{W}$ is an idempotent variety and there are terms $f(x,y)$ and $g(x,y)$ such that $\mathcal{W}$ satisfies the identity $f(x,y) = g(x,y)$ and $\mathcal{V}$ satisfies the identities $f(x,y) = x$ and $g(x,y) = y$, then $\mathcal{V} \circ \mathcal{W}$ is a variety. We also provide a number of examples and applications of this result.

math.RA

Mal'tsev products of varieties, II

The Mal'tsev product of two varieties of the same similarity type is not in general a variety, because it can fail to be closed under homomorphic images. In the previous paper we provided a new sufficient condition for such a product to be a variety. In this paper we extend that result by weakening the assumptions regarding the two varieties. We also explore the various special cases of our new result and provide a number of examples of its application.

math.RA