arXiv subjects

Tomohiro Koana

Publications and source records attributed to Tomohiro Koana.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2024

Subexponential Algorithms for Clique Cover on Unit Disk and Unit Ball Graphs

In Clique Cover, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the task is to partition the vertices of $G$ into $k$ cliques. Clique Cover on unit ball graphs has a natural interpretation as a clustering problem, where the objective function is the maximum diameter of a cluster. Many classical NP-hard problems are known to admit $2^{O(n^{(1 - 1/d)})}$-time algorithms on unit ball graphs in $\mathbb{R}^d$ [de Berg et al., SIAM J. Comp 2018]. A notable exception is the Maximum Clique problem, which admits a polynomial-time algorithm on unit disk graphs and a subexponential algorithm on unit ball graphs in $\mathbb{R}^3$, but no subexponential algorithm on unit ball graphs in dimensions 4 or larger, assuming the ETH [Bonamy et al., JACM 2021]. In this work, we show that Clique Cover also suffers from a "curse of dimensionality", albeit in a significantly different way compared to Maximum Clique. We present a $2^{O(\sqrt{n})}$-time algorithm for unit disk graphs and argue that it is tight under the ETH. On the other hand, we show that Clique Cover does not admit a $2^{o(n)}$-time algorithm on unit ball graphs in dimension $5$, unless the ETH fails.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Structural Parameterizations of the Biclique-Free Vertex Deletion Problem

In this work, we study the Biclique-Free Vertex Deletion problem: Given a graph $G$ and integers $k$ and $i \le j$, find a set of at most $k$ vertices that intersects every (not necessarily induced) biclique $K_{i, j}$ in $G$. This is a natural generalization of the Bounded-Degree Deletion problem, wherein one asks whether there is a set of at most $k$ vertices whose deletion results in a graph of a given maximum degree $r$. The two problems coincide when $i = 1$ and $j = r + 1$. We show that Biclique-Free Vertex Deletion is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to $k + d$ for the degeneracy $d$ by developing a $2^{O(d k^2)} \cdot n^{O(1)}$-time algorithm. We also show that it can be solved in $2^{O(f k)} \cdot n^{O(1)}$ time for the feedback vertex number $f$ when $i \ge 2$. In contrast, we find that it is W[1]-hard for the treedepth for any integer $i \ge 1$. Finally, we show that Biclique-Free Vertex Deletion has a polynomial kernel for every $i \ge 1$ when parameterized by the feedback edge number. Previously, for this parameter, its fixed-parameter tractability for $i = 1$ was known (Betzler et al., 2012) but the existence of polynomial kernel was open.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Fully Polynomial-time Algorithms Parameterized by Vertex Integrity Using Fast Matrix Multiplication

We study the computational complexity of several polynomial-time-solvable graph problems parameterized by vertex integrity, a measure of a graph's vulnerability to vertex removal in terms of connectivity. Vertex integrity is the smallest number $ι$ such that there is a set $S$ of $ι' \le ι$ vertices such that every connected component of $G-S$ contains at most $ι-ι'$ vertices. It is known that the vertex integrity lies between the well-studied parameters vertex cover number and tree-depth. Alon and Yuster [ESA 2007] designed algorithms for graphs with small vertex cover number using fast matrix multiplications. We demonstrate that fast matrix multiplication can also be effectively used when parameterizing by vertex integrity $ι$ by developing efficient algorithms for problems including an $O(ι^{ω-1}n)$-time algorithm for computing the girth of a graph, randomized $O(ι^{ω- 1}n)$-time algorithms for Maximum Matching and for finding any induced four-vertex subgraph except for a clique or an independent set, and an $O(ι^{(ω-1)/2}n^2) \subseteq O(ι^{0.687} n^2)$-time algorithm for All-Pairs Shortest Paths. These algorithms can be faster than previous algorithms parameterized by tree-depth, for which fast matrix multiplication is not known to be effective.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Faster algorithms on linear delta-matroids

We show new algorithms and constructions over linear delta-matroids. We observe an alternative representation for linear delta-matroids, as a contraction representation over a skew-symmetric matrix. This is equivalent to the more standard "twist representation" up to $O(n^ω)$-time transformations, but is much more convenient for algorithmic tasks. For instance, the problem of finding a max-weight feasible set now reduces directly to the problem of finding a max-weight basis in a linear matroid. Supported by this representation, we provide new algorithms and constructions over linear delta-matroids. We show that the union and delta-sum of linear delta-matroids define linear delta-matroids, and a representation for the resulting delta-matroid can be constructed in randomized time $O(n^ω)$. Previously, it was only known that these operations define delta-matroids. We also note that every projected linear delta-matroid can be represented as an elementary projection. This implies that several optimization problems over (projected) linear delta-matroids, including the coverage, delta-coverage, and parity problems, reduce (in their decision versions) to a single $O(n^ω)$-time matrix rank computation. Using the methods of Harvey, previously used by Cheung, Lao and Leung for linear matroid parity, we furthermore show how to solve the search versions in the same time. This improves on the $O(n^4)$-time augmenting path algorithm of Geelen, Iwata and Murota. Finally, we consider the maximum-cardinality delta-matroid intersection problem. Using Storjohann's algorithms for symbolic determinants, we show that such a solution can be found in $O(n^{ω+1})$ time. This is the first polynomial-time algorithm for the problem, solving an open question of Kakimura and Takamatsu.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

FPT Approximation and Subexponential Algorithms for Covering Few or Many Edges

We study the \textsc{$α$-Fixed Cardinality Graph Partitioning ($α$-FCGP)} problem, the generic local graph partitioning problem introduced by Bonnet et al. [Algorithmica 2015]. In this problem, we are given a graph $G$, two numbers $k,p$ and $0\leqα\leq 1$, the question is whether there is a set $S\subseteq V$ of size $k$ with a specified coverage function $cov_α(S)$ at least $p$ (or at most $p$ for the minimization version). The coverage function $cov_α(\cdot)$ counts edges with exactly one endpoint in $S$ with weight $α$ and edges with both endpoints in $S$ with weight $1 - α$. $α$-FCGP generalizes a number of fundamental graph problems such as \textsc{Densest $k$-Subgraph}, \textsc{Max $k$-Vertex Cover}, and \textsc{Max $(k,n-k)$-Cut}. A natural question in the study of $α$-FCGP is whether the algorithmic results known for its special cases, like \textsc{Max $k$-Vertex Cover}, could be extended to more general settings. One of the simple but powerful methods for obtaining parameterized approximation [Manurangsi, SOSA 2019] and subexponential algorithms [Fomin et al. IPL 2011] for \textsc{Max $k$-Vertex Cover} is based on the greedy vertex degree orderings. The main insight of our work is that the idea of greed vertex degree ordering could be used to design fixed-parameter approximation schemes (FPT-AS) for $α> 0$ and the subexponential-time algorithms for the problem on apex-minor free graphs for maximization with $α> 1/3$ and minimization with $α< 1/3$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Parameterized Algorithms for Colored Clustering

In the Colored Clustering problem, one is asked to cluster edge-colored (hyper-)graphs whose colors represent interaction types. More specifically, the goal is to select as many edges as possible without choosing two edges that share an endpoint and are colored differently. Equivalently, the goal can also be described as assigning colors to the vertices in a way that fits the edge-coloring as well as possible. As this problem is NP-hard, we build on previous work by studying its parameterized complexity. We give a $2^{\mathcal O(k)} \cdot n^{\mathcal O(1)}$-time algorithm where $k$ is the number of edges to be selected and $n$ the number of vertices. We also prove the existence of a problem kernel of size $\mathcal O(k^{5/2} )$, resolving an open problem posed in the literature. We consider parameters that are smaller than $k$, the number of edges to be selected, and $r$, the number of edges that can be deleted. Such smaller parameters are obtained by considering the difference between $k$ or $r$ and some lower bound on these values. We give both algorithms and lower bounds for Colored Clustering with such parameterizations. Finally, we settle the parameterized complexity of Colored Clustering with respect to structural graph parameters by showing that it is $W[1]$-hard with respect to both vertex cover number and tree-cut width, but fixed-parameter tractable with respect to slim tree-cut width.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Induced Matching below Guarantees: Average Paves the Way for Fixed-Parameter Tractability

In this work, we study the Induced Matching problem: Given an undirected graph $G$ and an integer $\ell$, is there an induced matching $M$ of size at least $\ell$? An edge subset $M$ is an induced matching in $G$ if $M$ is a matching such that there is no edge between two distinct edges of $M$. Our work looks into the parameterized complexity of Induced Matching with respect to "below guarantee" parameterizations. We consider the parameterization $u - \ell$ for an upper bound $u$ on the size of any induced matching. For instance, any induced matching is of size at most $n / 2$ where $n$ is the number of vertices, which gives us a parameter $n / 2 - \ell$. In fact, there is a straightforward $9^{n/2 - \ell} \cdot n^{O(1)}$-time algorithm for Induced Matching [Moser and Thilikos, J. Discrete Algorithms]. Motivated by this, we ask: Is Induced Matching FPT for a parameter smaller than $n / 2 - \ell$? In search for such parameters, we consider $MM(G) - \ell$ and $IS(G) - \ell$, where $MM(G)$ is the maximum matching size and $IS(G)$ is the maximum independent set size of $G$. We find that Induced Matching is presumably not FPT when parameterized by $MM(G) - \ell$ or $IS(G) - \ell$. In contrast to these intractability results, we find that taking the average of the two helps -- our main result is a branching algorithm that solves Induced Matching in $49^{(MM(G) + IS(G))/ 2 - \ell} \cdot n^{O(1)}$ time. Our algorithm makes use of the Gallai-Edmonds decomposition to find a structure to branch on.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Correlating Theory and Practice in Finding Clubs and Plexes

Finding large "cliquish" subgraphs is a classic NP-hard graph problem. In this work, we focus on finding maximum $s$-clubs and $s$-plexes, i.e., graphs of diameter $s$ and graphs where each vertex is adjacent to all but $s$ vertices. Preprocessing based on Turing kernelization is a standard tool to tackle these problems, especially on sparse graphs. We provide a new parameterized analysis for the Turing kernelization and demonstrate their usefulness in practice. Moreover, we provide evidence that the new theoretical bounds indeed better explain the observed running times than the existing theoretical running time bounds. To this end, we suggest a general method to compare how well theoretical running time bounds fit to measured running times.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Kernelization for Partial Vertex Cover via (Additive) Expansion Lemma

Given a graph and two integers $k$ and $\ell$, Partial Vertex Cover asks for a set of at most $k$ vertices whose deletion results in a graph with at most $\ell$ edges. Based on the expansion lemma, we provide a problem kernel with $(\ell + 2)(k + \ell)$ vertices. We then introduce a new, additive version of the expansion lemma and show it can be used to prove a kernel with $(\ell + 1)(k + \ell)$ vertices for $\ell \ge 1$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Computing Dense and Sparse Subgraphs of Weakly Closed Graphs

A graph $G$ is weakly $γ$-closed if every induced subgraph of $G$ contains one vertex $v$ such that for each non-neighbor $u$ of $v$ it holds that $|N(u)\cap N(v)|<γ$. The weak closure $γ(G)$ of a graph, recently introduced by Fox et al. [SIAM J. Comp. 2020], is the smallest number such that $G$ is weakly $γ$-closed. This graph parameter is never larger than the degeneracy (plus one) and can be significantly smaller. Extending the work of Fox et al. [SIAM J. Comp. 2020] on clique enumeration, we show that several problems related to finding dense subgraphs, such as the enumeration of bicliques and $s$-plexes, are fixed-parameter tractable with respect to $γ(G)$. Moreover, we show that the problem of determining whether a weakly $γ$-closed graph $G$ has a subgraph on at least $k$ vertices that belongs to a graph class $\mathcal{G}$ which is closed under taking subgraphs admits a kernel with at most $γk^2$ vertices. Finally, we provide fixed-parameter algorithms for Independent Dominating Set and Dominating Clique when parameterized by $γ+k$ where $k$ is the solution size.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2022

The Complexity of Binary Matrix Completion Under Diameter Constraints

We thoroughly study a novel but basic combinatorial matrix completion problem: Given a binary incomplete matrix, fill in the missing entries so that every pair of rows in the resulting matrix has a Hamming distance within a specified range. We obtain an almost complete picture of the complexity landscape regarding the distance constraints and the maximum number of missing entries in any row. We develop polynomial-time algorithms for maximum diameter three based on Deza's theorem [Discret. Math. 1973] from extremal set theory. We also prove NP-hardness for diameter at least four. For the number of missing entries per row, we show polynomial-time solvability when there is only one and NP-hardness when there can be at least two. In many of our algorithms, we heavily rely on Deza's theorem to identify sunflower structures. This paves the way towards polynomial-time algorithms which are based on finding graph factors and solving 2-SAT instances.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Covering Many (or Few) Edges with k Vertices in Sparse Graphs

We study the following two fixed-cardinality optimization problems (a maximization and a minimization variant). For a fixed $α$ between zero and one we are given a graph and two numbers $k \in \mathbb{N}$ and $t \in \mathbb{Q}$. The task is to find a vertex subset $S$ of exactly $k$ vertices that has value at least (resp. at most for minimization) $t$. Here, the value of a vertex set computes as $α$ times the number of edges with exactly one endpoint in $S$ plus $1-α$ times the number of edges with both endpoints in $S$. These two problems generalize many prominent graph problems, such as Densest $k$-Subgraph, Sparsest $k$-Subgraph, Partial Vertex Cover, and Max ($k$,$n-k$)-Cut. In this work, we complete the picture of their parameterized complexity on several types of sparse graphs that are described by structural parameters. In particular, we provide kernelization algorithms and kernel lower bounds for these problems. A somewhat surprising consequence of our kernelizations is that Partial Vertex Cover and Max $(k,n-k)$-Cut not only behave in the same way but that the kernels for both problems can be obtained by the same algorithms.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Vertex Cover and Feedback Vertex Set Above and Below Structural Guarantees

Vertex Cover parameterized by the solution size k is the quintessential fixed-parameter tractable problem. FPT algorithms are most interesting when the parameter is small. Several lower bounds on k are well-known, such as the maximum size of a matching. This has led to a line of research on parameterizations of Vertex Cover by the difference of the solution size k and a lower bound. The most prominent cases for such lower bounds for which the problem is FPT are the matching number or the optimal fractional LP solution. We investigate parameterizations by the difference between k and other graph parameters including the feedback vertex number, the degeneracy, cluster deletion number, and treewidth with the goal of finding the border of fixed-parameter tractability for said difference parameterizations. We also consider similar parameterizations of the Feedback Vertex Set problem.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

The Complexity of Finding Fair Many-to-One Matchings

We analyze the (parameterized) computational complexity of "fair" variants of bipartite many-to-one matching, where each vertex from the "left" side is matched to exactly one vertex and each vertex from the "right" side may be matched to multiple vertices. We want to find a "fair" matching, in which each vertex from the right side is matched to a "fair" set of vertices. Assuming that each vertex from the left side has one color modeling its attribute, we study two fairness criteria. In one of them, we deem a vertex set fair if for any two colors, the difference between the numbers of their occurrences does not exceed a given threshold. Fairness is relevant when finding many-to-one matchings between students and colleges, voters and constituencies, and applicants and firms. Here colors may model sociodemographic attributes, party memberships, and qualifications, respectively. We show that finding a fair many-to-one matching is NP-hard even for three colors and maximum degree five. Our main contribution is the design of fixed-parameter tractable algorithms with respect to the number of vertices on the right side. Our algorithms make use of a variety of techniques including color coding. At the core lie integer linear programs encoding Hall like conditions. To establish the correctness of our integer programs, we prove a new separation result, inspired by Frank's separation theorem [Frank, Discrete Math. 1982], which may also be of independent interest. We further obtain complete complexity dichotomies regarding the number of colors and the maximum degree of each side.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Exploiting $\mathbf{c}$-Closure in Kernelization Algorithms for Graph Problems

A graph is c-closed if every pair of vertices with at least c common neighbors is adjacent. The c-closure of a graph G is the smallest number such that G is c-closed. Fox et al. [ICALP '18] defined c-closure and investigated it in the context of clique enumeration. We show that c-closure can be applied in kernelization algorithms for several classic graph problems. We show that Dominating Set admits a kernel of size k^O(c), that Induced Matching admits a kernel with O(c^7*k^8) vertices, and that Irredundant Set admits a kernel with O(c^(5/2)*k^3) vertices. Our kernelization exploits the fact that c-closed graphs have polynomially-bounded Ramsey numbers, as we show.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2022

Stable Matching with Multilayer Approval Preferences: Approvals can be Harder than Strict Preferences

We study stable matching problems where agents have multilayer preferences: There are $\ell$ layers each consisting of one preference relation for each agent. Recently, Chen et al. [EC '18] studied such problems with strict preferences, establishing four multilayer adaptions of classical notions of stability. We follow up on their work by analyzing the computational complexity of stable matching problems with multilayer approval preferences. We consider eleven stability notions derived from three well-established stability notions for stable matchings with ties and the four adaptions proposed by Chen et al. For each stability notion, we show that the problem of finding a stable matching is either polynomial-time solvable or NP-hard. Furthermore, we examine the influence of the number of layers and the desired "degree of stability" on the problems' complexity. Somewhat surprisingly, we discover that assuming approval preferences instead of strict preferences does not considerably simplify the situation (and sometimes even makes polynomial-time solvable problems NP-hard).

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

A Refined Complexity Analysis of Fair Districting over Graphs

We study the NP-hard Fair Connected Districting problem recently proposed by Stoica et al. [AAMAS 2020]: Partition a vertex-colored graph into k connected components (subsequently referred to as districts) so that in every district the most frequent color occurs at most a given number of times more often than the second most frequent color. Fair Connected Districting is motivated by various real-world scenarios where agents of different types, which are one-to-one represented by nodes in a network, have to be partitioned into disjoint districts. Herein, one strives for "fair districts" without any type being in a dominating majority in any of the districts. This is to e.g. prevent segregation or political domination of some political party. We conduct a fine-grained analysis of the (parameterized) computational complexity of Fair Connected Districting. In particular, we prove that it is polynomial-time solvable on paths, cycles, stars, and caterpillars, but already becomes NP-hard on trees. Motivated by the latter negative result, we perform a parameterized complexity analysis with respect to various graph parameters, including treewidth, and problem-specific parameters, including, the numbers of colors and districts. We obtain a rich and diverse, close to complete picture of the corresponding parameterized complexity landscape (that is, a classification along the complexity classes FPT, XP, W[1]-hard, and para-NP-hard).

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Data Reduction for Maximum Matching on Real-World Graphs: Theory and Experiments

Finding a maximum-cardinality or maximum-weight matching in (edge-weighted) undirected graphs is among the most prominent problems of algorithmic graph theory. For $n$-vertex and $m$-edge graphs, the best known algorithms run in $\widetilde{O}(m\sqrt{n})$ time. We build on recent theoretical work focusing on linear-time data reduction rules for finding maximum-cardinality matchings and complement the theoretical results by presenting and analyzing (thereby employing the kernelization methodology of parameterized complexity analysis) new (near-)linear-time data reduction rules for both the unweighted and the positive-integer-weighted case. Moreover, we experimentally demonstrate that these data reduction rules provide significant speedups of the state-of-the art implementations for computing matchings in real-world graphs: the average speedup factor is 4.7 in the unweighted case and 12.72 in the weighted case.

cs.DS↗