Tyler Wannamaker | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Superconductivity in the high-pressure tetragonal phase of UTe2

Electrical transport and magnetic measurements have been made on UTe2 under pressure P up to approximately 16 GPa to determine the superconducting transition temperature Tc vs P phase diagram in the high-pressure tetragonal phase. Superconductivity emerges near 5 GPa, coincident with the orthorhombic to tetragonal phase transition; in the tetragonal phase, Tc reaches a maximum value of approximately 4 K at 6 GPa and then decreases with P and appears to vanish near 18 GPa. Tetragonal UTe2 has a relatively small upper critical field Hc2(0) $\approx$ 1.2 T at 5.3 GPa, smaller than the Pauli paramagnetic limit, and is orbitally limited with a coherence length $\xi$tetra $\approx$ 16.5 nm. This small value of Hc2(0) favors more conventional superconductivity; in contrast, the large values of Hc2(T) for orthorhombic UTe2 exceed the Pauli paramagnetic limit in all three crystallographic directions and have been attributed to unconventional superconductivity, widely believed to involve spin-triplet pairing. The temperature-pressure phase diagram of UTe2 shows a striking dichotomy: a narrow, fragile, unconventional superconducting region in the orthorhombic phase vs a broad, robust, and more conventional superconducting dome in the tetragonal phase. This dichotomy is consistent with the proposal that U-dimers, present (absent) in the orthorhombic (tetragonal) phase, may play a role in spin-triplet superconductivity of orthorhombic UTe2. In the tetragonal phase, the normal-state electrical resistivity $\rho$(T) exhibits metallic behavior with a knee between 200 and 240 K that depends weakly on P and most likely marks the onset of a transition to a magnetically ordered phase that coexists with superconductivity.

cond-mat.supr-con↗

arXiv2025

High-Magnetic Field Phases in U$_{1-x}$Th$_x$Te$_2$

At temperatures much lower than its superconducting critical temperature $T_c$ of 2.1 K, the heavy fermion superconductor UTe$_2$ has a remarkable phase diagram of magnetic field $H$ vs. angles $\phi$ and $\theta$ at which $H$ is tilted away from the $b$-axis toward the $a$- and $c$-axes, respectively, in the orthorhombic unit cell. The phase diagram appears to contain three superconducting phases: (1) a low field superconducting phase SC$_{\mathrm{LF}}$ extending over all values of $\phi$ and $\theta$ with an upper critical field $H_{c2}$ with a maximum value of 15 T at $\phi = \theta = 0^\circ$; (2) a high field superconducting phase SC$_{\mathrm{HF}}$ located in a region between $\phi \approx 7^\circ$ and $\theta \approx 4^\circ$ in fields from $H_{c2\mathrm{LF}}$ of the SC$_{\mathrm{LF}}$ phase and the metamagnetic transition at $H_m$ at $\sim 35$ T marking the onset of the magnetic field polarized FP phase: and (3) a SC$_{\mathrm{FP}}$ superconducting phase that resides entirely within the FP phase in a pocket of superconductivity extending from $\theta \approx 20^\circ$ to $40^\circ$ in fields from $\sim 40$ T to above 60 T. In this work, we studied the $H$ vs $\theta$ phase diagram at a base temperature of $\sim 0.6$ K as a function of Th concentration $x$ in U$_{1-x}$Th$_x$Te$_2$ pseudobinary compounds for $0.5\% \lesssim x \lesssim 4.7\%$. We find that for all values of $x$ within this range, the SC$_{\mathrm{LF}}$ phase is retained with a reduced value of $H_{c2}$ of $\sim 10$ T at $\phi = \theta = 0^\circ$ for $x = 4.7\%$, while the SC$_{\mathrm{HF}}$ phase is suppressed. The SC$_{\mathrm{FP}}$ and FP phases are unaffected to values of $x = 2\%$ but are completely suppressed in the region $x = 2.5$ to $4.7\%$ where the residual resistance ratio RRR has decreased from $\sim 14$ at $x = 1.5\%$ to values of $\sim 3$, indicating a significant increase in disorder.

cond-mat.str-el↗