Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Uéverton S. Souza

Publications and source records attributed to Uéverton S. Souza.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Computing distances is FPT on graph associahedra and W[2]-hard on hypergraphic polytopes

An elimination tree of a connected graph $G$ is a rooted tree on the vertices of $G$ obtained by choosing a root $v$ and recursing on the connected components of $G-v$ to obtain the subtrees of $v$. The graph associahedron of $G$ is a polytope whose vertices correspond to elimination trees of $G$ and whose edges correspond to tree rotations, a natural operation between elimination trees. These objects generalize associahedra, which correspond to the case where $G$ is a path. Ito et al. [ICALP 2023] recently proved that the problem of computing distances on graph associahedra is NP-hard. In this paper we prove that the problem, for a general graph $G$, is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the distance $k$. Prior to our work, only the case where $G$ is a path was known to be fixed-parameter tractable. To prove our result, we use a novel approach based on a marking scheme that restricts the search to a set of vertices whose size is bounded by a (large) function of $k$. On the negative side, we show that it is unlikely that FPT algorithms exist on a natural generalization of graph associahedra, namely hypergraphic polytopes, by proving that computing distances on them is W[2]-hard parameterized by the distance. We also prove that, on hypergraphic polytopes, the distance cannot be approximated in polynomial time within a factor $c \cdot \log(|V|+|\mathcal{E}|)$ for some constant $c > 0$ unless P = NP, where $H=(V, \mathcal{E})$ is the input hypergraph. This result strengthens the hardness result of Cardinal and Steiner [Combin. Theory 2025], who proved that the problem cannot be approximated within a factor $(1 + \varepsilon)$ for some absolute constant $\varepsilon > 0$ unless P = NP. Finally, we rule out the existence of polynomial kernels parameterized by the number of vertices of the input hypergraph, a parameter for which the problem is easily seen to be FPT.

cs.DS↗

Exact and Parameterized Algorithms for the Independent Cutset Problem

The Independent Cutset problem asks whether there is a set of vertices in a given graph that is both independent and a cutset. Such a problem is $\textsf{NP}$-complete even when the input graph is planar and has maximum degree five. In this paper, we first present a $\mathcal{O}^*(1.4423^{n})$-time algorithm for the problem. We also show how to compute a minimum independent cutset (if any) in the same running time. Since the property of having an independent cutset is MSO$_1$-expressible, our main results are concerned with structural parameterizations for the problem considering parameters that are not bounded by a function of the clique-width of the input. We present $\textsf{FPT}$-time algorithms for the problem considering the following parameters: the dual of the maximum degree, the dual of the solution size, the size of a dominating set (where a dominating set is given as an additional input), the size of an odd cycle transversal, the distance to chordal graphs, and the distance to $P_5$-free graphs. We close by introducing the notion of $α$-domination, which allows us to identify more fixed-parameter tractable and polynomial-time solvable cases.

cs.DS↗

On Conflict-Free Cuts: Algorithms and Complexity

One way to define the Matching Cut problem is: Given a graph $G$, is there an edge-cut $M$ of $G$ such that $M$ is an independent set in the line graph of $G$? We propose the more general Conflict-Free Cut problem: Together with the graph $G$, we are given a so-called conflict graph $\hat{G}$ on the edges of $G$, and we ask for an edge-cutset $M$ of $G$ that is independent in $\hat{G}$. Since conflict-free settings are popular generalizations of classical optimization problems and Conflict-Free Cut was not considered in the literature so far, we start the study of the problem. We show that the problem is $\textsf{NP}$-complete even when the maximum degree of $G$ is 5 and $\hat{G}$ is 1-regular. The same reduction implies an exponential lower bound on the solvability based on the Exponential Time Hypothesis. We also give parameterized complexity results: We show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable with the vertex cover number of $G$ as a parameter, and we show $\textsf{W[1]}$-hardness even when $G$ has a feedback vertex set of size one, and the clique cover number of $\hat{G}$ is the parameter. Since the clique cover number of $\hat{G}$ is an upper bound on the independence number of $\hat{G}$ and thus the solution size, this implies $\textsf{W[1]}$-hardness when parameterized by the cut size. We list polynomial-time solvable cases and interesting open problems. At last, we draw a connection to a symmetric variant of SAT.

cs.DS↗

Simple and tight complexity lower bounds for solving Rabin games

We give a simple proof that assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), determining the winner of a Rabin game cannot be done in time $2^{o(k \log k)} \cdot n^{O(1)}$, where $k$ is the number of pairs of vertex subsets involved in the winning condition and $n$ is the vertex count of the game graph. While this result follows from the lower bounds provided by Calude et al [SIAM J. Comp. 2022], our reduction is simpler and arguably provides more insight into the complexity of the problem. In fact, the analogous lower bounds discussed by Calude et al, for solving Muller games and multidimensional parity games, follow as simple corollaries of our approach. Our reduction also highlights the usefulness of a certain pivot problem -- Permutation SAT -- which may be of independent interest.

cs.FL↗

Sparse vertex cutsets and the maximum degree

We show that every graph $G$ of maximum degree $Δ$ and sufficiently large order has a vertex cutset $S$ of order at most $Δ$ that induces a subgraph $G[S]$ of maximum degree at most $Δ-3$. For $Δ\in \{ 4,5\}$, we refine this result by considering also the average degree of $G[S]$. If $G$ has no $K_{r,r}$ subgraph, then we show the existence of a vertex cutset that induces a subgraph of maximum degree at most $\left(1-\frac{1}{r\choose 2}\right)Δ+O(1)$.

math.CO↗

On the Minimum Cycle Cover problem on graphs with bounded co-degeneracy

In 2021, Duarte, Oliveira, and Souza [MFCS 2021] showed some problems that are FPT when parameterized by the treewidth of the complement graph (called co-treewidth). Since the degeneracy of a graph is at most its treewidth, they also introduced the study of co-degeneracy (the degeneracy of the complement graph) as a parameter. In 1976, Bondy and Chvátal [DM 1976] introduced the notion of closure of a graph: let $\ell$ be an integer; the $(n+\ell)$-closure, $\operatorname{cl}_{n+\ell}(G)$, of a graph $G$ with $n$ vertices is obtained from $G$ by recursively adding an edge between pairs of nonadjacent vertices whose degree sum is at least $n+\ell$ until no such pair remains. A graph property $Υ$ defined on all graphs of order $n$ is said to be $(n+\ell)$-stable if for any graph $G$ of order $n$ that does not satisfy $Υ$, the fact that $uv$ is not an edge of $G$ and that $G+uv$ satisfies $Υ$ implies $d(u)+d(v)< n+\ell$. Duarte et al. [MFCS 2021] developed an algorithmic framework for co-degeneracy parameterization based on the notion of closures for solving problems that are $(n+\ell)$-stable for some $\ell$ bounded by a function of the co-degeneracy. In this paper, we first determine the stability of the property of having a bounded cycle cover. After that, combining the framework of Duarte et al. [MFCS 2021] with some results of Jansen, Kozma, and Nederlof [WG 2019], we obtain a $2^{\mathcal{O}(k)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$-time algorithm for Minimum Cycle Cover on graphs with co-degeneracy at most $k$, which generalizes Duarte et al. [MFCS 2021] and Jansen et al. [WG 2019] results concerning the Hamiltonian Cycle problem.

cs.DS↗

Perfect matching cuts partitioning a graph into complementary subgraphs

In Partition Into Complementary Subgraphs (Comp-Sub) we are given a graph $G=(V,E)$, and an edge set property $Π$, and asked whether $G$ can be decomposed into two graphs, $H$ and its complement $\overline{H}$, for some graph $H$, in such a way that the edge cut $[V(H),V(\overline{H})]$ satisfies the property $Π$. Motivated by previous work, we consider Comp-Sub($Π$) when the property $Π=\mathcal{PM}$ specifies that the edge cut of the decomposition is a perfect matching. We prove that Comp-Sub($\mathcal{PM}$) is GI-hard when the graph $G$ is $\{C_{k\geq 7}, \overline{C}_{k\geq 7} \}$-free. On the other hand, we show that Comp-Sub($\mathcal{PM}$) is polynomial-time solvable on $hole$-free graphs and on $P_5$-free graphs. Furthermore, we present characterizations of Comp-Sub($\mathcal{PM}$) on chordal, distance-hereditary, and extended $P_4$-laden graphs.

cs.DS↗

Computing the Best Case Energy Complexity of Satisfying Assignments in Monotone Circuits

Measures of circuit complexity are usually analyzed to ensure the computation of Boolean functions with economy and efficiency. One of these measures is energy complexity, which is related to the number of gates that output true in a circuit for an assignment. The idea behind energy complexity comes from the counting of `firing' neurons in a natural neural network. The initial model is based on threshold circuits, but recent works also have analyzed the energy complexity of traditional Boolean circuits. In this work, we discuss the time complexity needed to compute the best-case energy complexity among satisfying assignments of a monotone Boolean circuit, and we call such a problem as MinEC$^+_M$. In the MinEC$^+_M$ problem, we are given a monotone Boolean circuit $C$, a positive integer $k$ and asked to determine whether there is a satisfying assignment $X$ for $C$ such that $EC(C,X) \leq k$, where $EC(C,X)$ is the number of gates that output true in $C$ according to the assignment $X$. We prove that MinEC$^+_M$ is NP-complete even when the input monotone circuit is planar. Besides, we show that the problem is W[1]-hard but in XP when parameterized by the size of the solution. In contrast, we show that when the size of the solution and the genus of the input circuit are aggregated parameters, the MinEC$^+_M$ problem becomes fixed-parameter tractable.

cs.CC↗

Proving a directed analogue of the Gyárfás-Sumner conjecture for orientations of $P_4$

An oriented graph is a digraph that does not contain a directed cycle of length two. An (oriented) graph $D$ is $H$-free if $D$ does not contain $H$ as an induced sub(di)graph. The Gyárfás-Sumner conjecture is a widely-open conjecture on simple graphs, which states that for any forest $F$, there is some function $f$ such that every $F$-free graph $G$ with clique number $ω(G)$ has chromatic number at most $f(ω(G))$. Aboulker, Charbit, and Naserasr [Extension of Gyárfás-Sumner Conjecture to Digraphs; E-JC 2021] proposed an analogue of this conjecture to the dichromatic number of oriented graphs. The dichromatic number of a digraph $D$ is the minimum number of colors required to color the vertex set of $D$ so that no directed cycle in $D$ is monochromatic. Aboulker, Charbit, and Naserasr's $\overrightarrowχ$-boundedness conjecture states that for every oriented forest $F$, there is some function $f$ such that every $F$-free oriented graph $D$ has dichromatic number at most $f(ω(D))$, where $ω(D)$ is the size of a maximum clique in the graph underlying $D$. In this paper, we perform the first step towards proving Aboulker, Charbit, and Naserasr's $\overrightarrowχ$-boundedness conjecture by showing that it holds when $F$ is any orientation of a path on four vertices.

math.CO↗

Hitting forbidden induced subgraphs on bounded treewidth graphs

For a fixed graph $H$, the $H$-IS-Deletion problem asks, given a graph $G$, for the minimum size of a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ such that $G\setminus S$ does not contain $H$ as an induced subgraph. Motivated by previous work about hitting (topological) minors and subgraphs on bounded treewidth graphs, we are interested in determining, for a fixed graph $H$, the smallest function $f_H(t)$ such that $H$-IS-Deletion can be solved in time $f_H(t) \cdot n^{O(1)}$ assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), where $t$ and $n$ denote the treewidth and the number of vertices of the input graph, respectively. We show that $f_H(t) = 2^{O(t^{h-2})}$ for every graph $H$ on $h \geq 3$ vertices, and that $f_H(t) = 2^{O(t)}$ if $H$ is a clique or an independent set. We present a number of lower bounds by generalizing a reduction of Cygan et al. [MFCS 2014] for the subgraph version. In particular, we show that when $H$ deviates slightly from a clique, the function $f_H(t)$ suffers a sharp jump: if $H$ is obtained from a clique of size $h$ by removing one edge, then $f_H(t) = 2^{Θ(t^{h-2})}$. We also show that $f_H(t) = 2^{Ω(t^{h})}$ when $H=K_{h,h}$, and this reduction answers an open question of Mi. Pilipczuk [MFCS 2011] about the function $f_{C_4}(t)$ for the subgraph version. Motivated by Cygan et al. [MFCS 2014], we also consider the colorful variant of the problem, where each vertex of $G$ is colored with some color from $V(H)$ and we require to hit only induced copies of $H$ with matching colors. In this case, we determine, under the ETH, the function $f_H(t)$ for every connected graph $H$ on $h$ vertices: if $h\leq 2$ the problem can be solved in polynomial time; if $h\geq 3$, $f_H(t) = 2^{Θ(t)}$ if $H$ is a clique, and $f_H(t) = 2^{Θ(t^{h-2})}$ otherwise.

cs.DS↗

Recognizing well-dominated graphs is coNP-complete

A graph $G$ is well-covered if every minimal vertex cover of $G$ is minimum, and a graph $G$ is well-dominated if every minimal dominating set of $G$ is minimum. Studies on well-covered graphs were initiated in [Plummer, JCT 1970], and well-dominated graphs were first introduced in [Finbow, Hartnell and Nowakow, AC 1988]. Well-dominated graphs are well-covered, and both classes have been widely studied in the literature. The recognition of well-covered graphs was proved coNP-complete by [Chvátal and Slater, AODM 1993] and by [Sankaranarayana and Stewart, Networks 1992], but the complexity of recognizing well-dominated graphs has been left open since their introduction. We close this complexity gap by proving that recognizing well-dominated graphs is coNP-complete. This solves a well-known open question (c.f. [Levit and Tankus, DM 2017] and [Gözüpek, Hujdurovic and Milanič, DMTCS 2017]), which was first asked in [Caro, Sebő and Tarsi, JAlg 1996]. Surprisingly, our proof is quite simple, although it was a long-standing open problem. Finally, we show that recognizing well-totally-dominated graphs is coNP-complete, answering a question of [Bahad\ir, Ekim, and Gözüpek, AMC 2021].

math.CO↗

A note on independent sets in sparse-dense graphs

Sparse-dense partitions was introduced by Feder, Hell, Klein, and Motwani [STOC 1999, SIDMA 2003] as a tool to solve partitioning problems. In this paper, the following result concerning independent sets in graphs having sparse-dense partitions is presented: if a $n$-vertex graph $G$ admits a sparse-dense partition concerning classes $\mathcal S$ and $\mathcal D$, where $\mathcal D$ is a subclass of the complement of $K_t$-free graphs (for some ~$t$), and graphs in $\mathcal S$ can be recognized in polynomial time, then: enumerate all maximal independent sets of $G$ (or find its maximum) can be performed in $n^{O(1)}$ time whenever it can be done in polynomial time for graphs in the class $\mathcal S$. This result has the following interesting implications: A P versus NP-hard dichotomy for Max. Independent Set on graphs whose vertex set can be partitioned into $k$ independent sets and $\ell$ cliques, so-called $(k, \ell)$-graphs. concerning the values of $k$ and $\ell$ of $(k, \ell)$-graphs. A P-time algorithm that does not require $(1,\ell)$-partitions for determining whether a $(1,\ell)$-graph $G$ is well-covered. Well-covered graphs are graphs in which every maximal independent set has the same cardinality. The characterization of conflict graph classes for which the conflict version of a P-time graph problem is still in P assuming such classes. Conflict versions of graph problems ask for solutions avoiding pairs of conflicting elements (vertices or edges) described in conflict graphs.

cs.DM↗

Taming graphs with no large creatures and skinny ladders

We confirm a conjecture of Gartland and Lokshtanov [arXiv:2007.08761]: if for a hereditary graph class $\mathcal{G}$ there exists a constant $k$ such that no member of $\mathcal{G}$ contains a $k$-creature as an induced subgraph or a $k$-skinny-ladder as an induced minor, then there exists a polynomial $p$ such that every $G \in \mathcal{G}$ contains at most $p(|V(G)|)$ minimal separators. By a result of Fomin, Todinca, and Villanger [SIAM J. Comput. 2015] the latter entails the existence of polynomial-time algorithms for Maximum Weight Independent Set, Feedback Vertex Set and many other problems, when restricted to an input graph from $\mathcal{G}$. Furthermore, as shown by Gartland and Lokshtanov, our result implies a full dichotomy of hereditary graph classes defined by a finite set of forbidden induced subgraphs into tame (admitting a polynomial bound of the number of minimal separators) and feral (containing infinitely many graphs with exponential number of minimal separators).

math.CO↗

Reducing the Vertex Cover Number via Edge Contractions

The CONTRACTION(vc) problem takes as input a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices and two integers $k$ and $d$, and asks whether one can contract at most $k$ edges to reduce the size of a minimum vertex cover of $G$ by at least $d$. Recently, Lima et al. [JCSS 2021] proved, among other results, that unlike most of the so-called blocker problems, CONTRACTION(vc) admits an XP algorithm running in time $f(d) \cdot n^{O(d)}$. They left open the question of whether this problem is FPT under this parameterization. In this article, we continue this line of research and prove the following results: 1. CONTRACTION(vc) is W[1]-hard parameterized by $k + d$. Moreover, unless the ETH fails, the problem does not admit an algorithm running in time $f(k + d) \cdot n^{o(k + d)}$ for any function $f$. In particular, this answers the open question stated in Lima et al. [JCSS 2021] in the negative. 2. It is NP-hard to decide whether an instance $(G, k, d)$ of CONTRACTION(vc) is a yes-instance even when $k = d$, hence enhancing our understanding of the classical complexity of the problem. 3. CONTRACTION(vc) can be solved in time $2^{O(d)} \cdot n^{k - d + O(1)}$. This XP algorithm improves the one of Lima et al. [JCSS 2021], which uses Courcelle's theorem as a subroutine and hence, the $f(d)$-factor in the running time is non-explicit and probably very large. On the other hard, it shows that when $k=d$, the problem is FPT parameterized by $d$ (or by $k$).

cs.DS↗

Reducing graph transversals via edge contractions

For a graph invariant $π$, the Contraction($π$) problem consists in, given a graph $G$ and two positive integers $k,d$, deciding whether one can contract at most $k$ edges of $G$ to obtain a graph in which $π$ has dropped by at least $d$. Galby et al. [ISAAC 2019, MFCS 2019] recently studied the case where $π$ is the size of a minimum dominating set. We focus on graph invariants defined as the minimum size of a vertex set that hits all the occurrences of graphs in a collection ${\cal H}$ according to a fixed containment relation. We prove co-NP-hardness results under some assumptions on the graphs in ${\cal H}$, which in particular imply that Contraction($π$) is co-NP-hard even for fixed $k=d=1$ when $π$ is the size of a minimum feedback vertex set or an odd cycle transversal. In sharp contrast, we show that when $π$ is the size of a minimum vertex cover, the problem is in XP parameterized by $d$.

cs.DS↗

Computing the Largest Bond and the Maximum Connected Cut of a Graph

The cut-set $\partial(S)$ of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is the set of edges that have one endpoint in $S\subset V$ and the other endpoint in $V\setminus S$, and whenever $G[S]$ is connected, the cut $[S,V\setminus S]$ of $G$ is called a connected cut. A bond of a graph $G$ is an inclusion-wise minimal disconnecting set of $G$, i.e., bonds are cut-sets that determine cuts $[S,V\setminus S]$ of $G$ such that $G[S]$ and $G[V\setminus S]$ are both connected. Contrasting with a large number of studies related to maximum cuts, there exist very few results regarding the largest bond of general graphs. In this paper, we aim to reduce this gap on the complexity of computing the largest bond, and the maximum connected cut of a graph. Although cuts and bonds are similar, we remark that computing the largest bond and the maximum connected cut of a graph tends to be harder than computing its maximum cut. We show that it does not exist a constant-factor approximation algorithm to compute the largest bond, unless P = NP. Also, we show that {\sc Largest Bond} and {\sc Maximum Connected Cut} are NP-hard even for planar bipartite graphs, whereas \textsc{Maximum Cut} is trivial on bipartite graphs and polynomial-time solvable on planar graphs. In addition, we show that {\sc Largest Bond} and {\sc Maximum Connected Cut} are NP-hard on split graphs, and restricted to graphs of clique-width $w$ they can not be solved in time $f(w)\times n^{o(w)}$ unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, but they can be solved in time $f(w)\times n^{O(w)}$. Finally, we show that both problems are fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the size of the solution, the treewidth, and the twin-cover number.

cs.DS↗

The Complexity of Helly-$B_{1}$ EPG Graph Recognition

Golumbic, Lipshteyn, and Stern defined in 2009 the class of EPG graphs, the intersection graph class of edge paths on a grid. An EPG graph $G$ is a graph that admits a representation where its vertices correspond to paths in a grid $Q$, such that two vertices of $G$ are adjacent if and only if their corresponding paths in $Q$ have a common edge. If the paths in the representation have at most $k$ bends, we say that it is a $B_k$-EPG representation. A collection $C$ of sets satisfies the Helly property when every sub-collection of $C$ that is pairwise intersecting has at least one common element. In this paper, we show that given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the problem of determining whether $G$ admits a $B_k$-EPG representation whose edge-intersections of paths satisfy the Helly property, so-called Helly-$B_k$-EPG representation, is in NP, for every $k$ bounded by a polynomial function of $|V(G)|$. Moreover, we show that the problem of recognizing Helly-$B_1$-EPG graphs is NP-complete, and it remains NP-complete even when restricted to 2-apex and 3-degenerate graphs.

cs.DM↗

Linear-time Algorithms for Eliminating Claws in Graphs

Since many NP-complete graph problems have been shown polynomial-time solvable when restricted to claw-free graphs, we study the problem of determining the distance of a given graph to a claw-free graph, considering vertex elimination as measure. CLAW-FREE VERTEX DELETION (CFVD) consists of determining the minimum number of vertices to be removed from a graph such that the resulting graph is claw-free. Although CFVD is NP-complete in general and recognizing claw-free graphs is still a challenge, where the current best algorithm for a graph $G$ has the same running time of the best algorithm for matrix multiplication, we present linear-time algorithms for CFVD on weighted block graphs and weighted graphs with bounded treewidth. Furthermore, we show that this problem can be solved in linear time by a simpler algorithm on forests, and we determine the exact values for full $k$-ary trees. On the other hand, we show that CLAW-FREE VERTEX DELETION is NP-complete even when the input graph is a split graph. We also show that the problem is hard to approximate within any constant factor better than $2$, assuming the Unique Games Conjecture.

cs.DS↗