Udani Ranasinghe | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Identifiability of phylogenetic networks and quintet concordance factors

Several statistical methods of phylogenetic network inference and testing for non-tree-like relationships are based on assessing genomic data through quartet Concordance Factors, the frequencies of 4-taxon topological relationships on gene trees. While such an approach obviates making several undesirable modeling assumptions, it also results in non-identifiability issues for network roots and for small cycles. In this work, an algorithm and accompanying Macaulay2 implementation are provided for computing $n$-tet Concordance Factors on any phylogenetic network. We employ this algorithm on quintet Concordance Factors, summarizing 5-taxon gene trees, to explore identifiability of level-1 networks under the Network Multispecies Coalescent model. We show some additional network features become identifiable that are not through quartets. As identifiability is a necessary prerequisite to inference by any method, this lays a foundation for future inference work.

q-bio.PE↗

arXiv2026

Semialgebraic Conditions for Identifying Triangles in Phylogenetic Networks

An important consideration for a model-based method of phylogenetic network inference is the identifiability of the network parameter of the model. A recurring theme in previous works exploring this issue is that it is often difficult to identify the orientation of edges in a triangle of the network. In fact, it has been shown that for some models it is impossible to determine the orientation of triangle edges utilizing the standard algebraic technique of phylogenetic invariants. In this work, we consider one such model with a Jukes-Cantor site-substitution process and no coalescence. We give a complete semialgebraic description of three, 3-leaf Jukes-Cantor phylogenetic network models with embedded triangles. By describing these base cases, we resolve several questions about the identifiability of networks with embedded triangles. We show that for any pair of models, the intersection and set differences of the models are full-dimensional regions of the space of site-pattern probability distributions. Thus, despite being algebraically indistinguishable, these network models are not identical, nor are they identifiable (or generically identifiable). Our results also yield a straightforward biological interpretation--that the signal from a hybridization event may be immediately detectable but decays over time until it is impossible to identify the orientation of edges in the triangle of a network.

q-bio.PE↗