Umberto Modigliani | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

The Dataset Friction Framework: measuring user-facing friction as a complement to FAIR

Open research data services have matured to the point where the cost of sustaining them at scale has become a primary design constraint, driving providers to make deliberate choices that may reduce user convenience to keep the service viable. The FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reuseable) principles describe whether a dataset is well stewarded, and FAIR compliance is often treated as a proxy for usability. FAIR does not capture the cost to a user of finding, accessing, interpreting, and applying a dataset. We introduce the Dataset Friction Framework (DFF) as a complement to FAIR, directly addressing usability. DFF measures user-facing friction across six dimensions, distinguishing engineered friction (deliberate data provider design choices that sustain a service) from accidental friction (defects that require remediation). The framework is validated against 18,556 support tickets from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (January 2024 to May 2026), which serves 280,000 registered users. Restricting the analysis to tickets raised by external reporters reduces the corpus by 12.3%, but every dimension's internal-staff share falls below this baseline -- confirming that the reported friction signals are genuinely user-facing. We then assess three real datasets across three providers and show that FAIR compliance and DFF friction can disagree in both directions: a 92% FAIR-compliant dataset can still carry substantial friction, and a 42% FAIR score can be an artefact of anti-scraping policy rather than poor stewardship. The two measures are non-redundant and jointly informative: FAIR compliance does not predict DFF friction in either direction. This constitutes the first large-scale empirical application of the framework; cross-institutional validation is identified as the immediate next step.

physics.ao-ph↗

arXiv2026

From Licensing to Open Access: Designing a Sustainable Transition in Operational Weather Data

This translational article documents the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) transition from a restricted data licensing model to open access under CC BY 4.0, completed in October 2025. The policy context included EU open data requirements and alignment with international data exchange frameworks. The transition was implemented through a tiered service model that kept core forecast data open while offering operationally supported delivery as a cost-recovered service. Between 2020 and 2025, ECMWF executed an iterative planning cycle: setting an annual target for revenue reduction, specifying additions to the open tier under that target, provisioning infrastructure, and assessing outcomes to update assumptions. Drawing on internal administrative records (2014 - 2025), we describe design choices, operational constraints, and early outcomes. In the six months following the end of the transition, more than 93% of previously paying organisations retained a Service Agreement, while open endpoint download volumes increased substantially. We discuss trade-offs in defining the open tier (resolution, parameters, schedule), the reduction of compliance overheads formerly associated with redistribution restrictions, and the scalability implications of global distribution. We note an emerging sustainability question as AI-based forecast products become freely available. The early evidence is consistent with the view that a tiered service model can be designed to reconcile open-access obligations with operational sustainability, subject to monitoring over longer contract renewal cycles (typically annual).

physics.ao-ph↗