Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Upendra S. Kapshikar

Publications and source records attributed to Upendra S. Kapshikar.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Tamper Detection against Unitary Operators

Security of a storage device against a tampering adversary has been a well-studied topic in classical cryptography. Such models give black-box access to an adversary, and the aim is to protect the stored message or abort the protocol if there is any tampering. In this work, we extend the scope of the theory of tamper detection codes against an adversary with quantum capabilities. We consider encoding and decoding schemes that are used to encode a $k$-qubit quantum message $\vert m\rangle$ to obtain an $n$-qubit quantum codeword $\vert {ψ_m} \rangle$. A quantum codeword $\vert {ψ_m} \rangle$ can be adversarially tampered via a unitary $U$ from some known tampering unitary family $\mathcal{U}_{\mathsf{Adv}}$ (acting on $\mathbb{C}^{2^n}$). Firstly, we initiate the general study of \emph{quantum tamper detection codes}, which detect if there is any tampering caused by the action of a unitary operator. In case there was no tampering, we would like to output the original message. We show that quantum tamper detection codes exist for any family of unitary operators $\mathcal{U}_{\mathsf{Adv}}$, such that $\vert\mathcal{U}_{\mathsf{Adv}} \vert < 2^{2^{αn}}$ for some constant $α\in (0,1/6)$; provided that unitary operators are not too close to the identity operator. Quantum tamper detection codes that we construct can be considered to be quantum variants of \emph{classical tamper detection codes} studied by Jafargholi and Wichs~['15], which are also known to exist under similar restrictions. Additionally, we show that when the message set $\mathcal{M}$ is classical, such a construction can be realized as a \emph{non-malleable code} against any $\mathcal{U}_{\mathsf{Adv}}$ of size up to $2^{2^{αn}}$.

cs.CR↗

The Diagonal Distance of CWS Codes

Quantum degeneracy in error correction is a feature unique to quantum error correcting codes, unlike their classical counterpart. It allows a quantum error correcting code to correct errors even when they can not uniquely pinpoint the error. The diagonal distance of a quantum code is an important parameter that characterizes if the quantum code is degenerate or not. If code has a distance more than the diagonal distance, then it is degenerate, whereas if it is below the diagonal distance, then it is nondegenerate. We show that most of the CWS codes without a cycle of length four attain the upper bound of diagonal distance d+1, where d is the minimum vertex degree of the associated graph. Addressing the question of degeneracy, we give necessary conditions on CWS codes to be degenerate. We show that any degenerate CWS code with graph $G$ and classical code C will either have a short cycle in the graph $G$ or will be such that the classical code C has one of the coordinates trivially zero for all codewords.

quant-ph↗