SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Uwe Moennich

Publications and source records attributed to Uwe Moennich.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Adjunction As Substitution: An Algebraic Formulation of Regular, Context-Free and Tree Adjoining Languages

This note presents a method of interpreting the tree adjoining languages as the natural third step in a hierarchy that starts with the regular and the context-free languages. The central notion in this account is that of a higher-order substitution. Whereas in traditional presentations of rule systems for abstract language families the emphasis has been on a first-order substitution process in which auxiliary variables are replaced by elements of the carrier of the proper algebra - concatenations of terminal and auxiliary category symbols in the string case - we lift this process to the level of operations defined on the elements of the carrier of the algebra. Our own view is that this change of emphasis provides the adequate platform for a better understanding of the operation of adjunction. To put it in a nutshell: Adjoining is not a first-order, but a second-order substitution operation.

cmp-lg

On Cloning Context-Freeness

To Rogers (1994) we owe the insight that monadic second order predicate logic with multiple successors (MSO) is well suited in many respects as a realistic formal base for syntactic theorizing. However, the agreeable formal properties of this logic come at a cost: MSO is equivalent with the class of regular tree automata/grammars, and, thereby, with the class of context-free languages. This paper outlines one approach towards a solution of MSO's expressivity problem. On the background of an algebraically refined Chomsky hierarchy, which allows the definition of several classes of languages--in particular, a whole hierarchy between CF and CS--via regular tree grammars over unambiguously derivable alphabets of varying complexity plus their respective yield-functions, it shows that not only some non-context-free string languages can be captured by context-free means in this way, but that this approach can be generalized to the corresponding structures. I.e., non-recognizable sets of structures can--up to homomorphism--be coded context-freely. Since the class of languages covered--Fischer's (1968} OI family of indexed languages--includes all attested instances of non-context-freeness in natural language, there exists an indirect, to be sure, but completely general way to formally describe the natural languages using a weak framework like MSO.

cmp-lg