V. K. Kutty Malu | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Parameterized Complexity of Biclique Contraction and Balanced Biclique Contraction

In this work, we initiate the complexity study of Biclique Contraction and Balanced Biclique Contraction. In these problems, given as input a graph G and an integer k, the objective is to determine whether one can contract at most k edges in G to obtain a biclique and a balanced biclique, respectively. We first prove that these problems are NP-complete even when the input graph is bipartite. Next, we study the parameterized complexity of these problems and show that they admit single exponential-time FPT algorithms when parameterized by the number k of edge contractions. Then, we show that Balanced Biclique Contraction admits a quadratic vertex kernel while Biclique Contraction does not admit any polynomial compression (or kernel) under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions. We also give faster FPT algorithms for contraction to restricted bicliques.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Revisiting Path Contraction and Cycle Contraction

The Path Contraction and Cycle Contraction problems take as input an undirected graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, $m$ edges and an integer $k$ and determine whether one can obtain a path or a cycle, respectively, by performing at most $k$ edge contractions in $G$. We revisit these NP-complete problems and prove the following results. Path Contraction admits an algorithm running in $\mathcal{O}^*(2^{k})$ time. This improves over the current algorithm known for the problem [Algorithmica 2014]. Cycle Contraction admits an algorithm running in $\mathcal{O}^*((2 + ε_{\ell})^k)$ time where $0 < ε_{\ell} \leq 0.5509$ is inversely proportional to $\ell = n - k$. Central to these results is an algorithm for a general variant of Path Contraction, namely, Path Contraction With Constrained Ends. We also give an $\mathcal{O}^*(2.5191^n)$-time algorithm to solve the optimization version of Cycle Contraction. Next, we turn our attention to restricted graph classes and show the following results. Path Contraction on planar graphs admits a polynomial-time algorithm. Path Contraction on chordal graphs does not admit an algorithm running in time $\mathcal{O}(n^{2-ε} \cdot 2^{o(tw)})$ for any $ε> 0$, unless the Orthogonal Vectors Conjecture fails. Here, $tw$ is the treewidth of the input graph. The second result complements the $\mathcal{O}(nm)$-time, i.e., $\mathcal{O}(n^2 \cdot tw)$-time, algorithm known for the problem [Discret. Appl. Math. 2014].

cs.DS↗