arXiv subjects

Vaclav Rozhon

Publications and source records attributed to Vaclav Rozhon.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Randomizing the Number of Centers in k-means++

The $k$-means++ algorithm is a standard and widely used seeding method for $k$-means clustering, but for a fixed number $k$ of centers its worst-case expected approximation ratio is $\Theta(\log k)$. We consider the same algorithm when an adversary first fixes the dataset and some $K$; the number of centers $k$ is then chosen uniformly from $\{K,\ldots,2K-1\}$. We prove that $k$-means++ is an $O(1)$-approximation with constant probability in this budget-smoothed setup.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Bidirectional Dijkstra's Algorithm is Instance-Optimal

Although Dijkstra's algorithm has near-optimal time complexity for the problem of finding a shortest path from a given vertex $s$ to a given vertex $t$, in practice other algorithms are often superior on huge graphs. A prominent example is bidirectional search, which concurrently executes Dijkstra's algorithm forward from $s$ and backward from $t$, and stops when these executions meet. In this paper, we give a strong theoretical justification for the use of bidirectional search to find a shortest $st$-path. We prove that for weighted multigraphs, both directed and undirected, a careful implementation of bidirectional search is instance-optimal with respect to the number of edges it examines. That is, we prove that no correct algorithm can outperform our implementation of bidirectional search on any single instance by more than a constant factor. For unweighted graphs, we show that bidirectional breadth-first search is instance-optimal up to a factor of $O(\Delta)$ where $\Delta$ is the maximum degree of the graph. We also show that this is best possible.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Fast and Simple Sorting Using Partial Information

We consider the problem of sorting $n$ items, given the outcomes of $m$ pre-existing comparisons. We present a simple and natural deterministic algorithm that runs in $O(m + \log T)$ time and does $O(\log T)$ comparisons, where $T$ is the number of total orders consistent with the pre-existing comparisons. Our running time and comparison bounds are best possible up to constant factors, thus resolving a problem that has been studied intensely since 1976 (Fredman, Theoretical Computer Science). The best previous algorithm with a bound of $O(\log T)$ on the number of comparisons has a time bound of $O(n^{2.5})$ and is more complicated. Our algorithm combines three classic algorithms: topological sort, heapsort with the right kind of heap, and efficient search in a sorted list. It outputs the items in sorted order one by one. It can be modified to stop early, thereby solving the important and more general top-$k$ sorting problem: Given $k$ and the outcomes of some pre-existing comparisons, output the smallest $k$ items in sorted order. The modified algorithm solves the top-$k$ sorting problem in minimum time and comparisons, to within constant factors.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

The Landscape of Distributed Complexities on Trees and Beyond

We study the local complexity landscape of locally checkable labeling (LCL) problems on constant-degree graphs with a focus on complexities below $\log^* n$. Our contribution is threefold: Our main contribution is that we complete the classification of the complexity landscape of LCL problems on trees in the LOCAL model, by proving that every LCL problem with local complexity $o(\log^* n)$ has actually complexity $O(1)$. This result improves upon the previous speedup result from $o(\log \log^* n)$ to $O(1)$ by [Chang, Pettie, FOCS 2017]. In the related LCA and Volume models [Alon, Rubinfeld, Vardi, Xie, SODA 2012, Rubinfeld, Tamir, Vardi, Xie, 2011, Rosenbaum, Suomela, PODC 2020], we prove the same speedup from $o(\log^* n)$ to $O(1)$ for all bounded degree graphs. Similarly, we complete the classification of the LOCAL complexity landscape of oriented $d$-dimensional grids by proving that any LCL problem with local complexity $o(\log^* n)$ has actually complexity $O(1)$. This improves upon the previous speed-up from $o(\sqrt[d]{\log^* n})$ by Suomela in [Chang, Pettie, FOCS 2017].

cs.DS↗