arXiv subjects

Valeria Pontillo

Publications and source records attributed to Valeria Pontillo.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

SCOPE: A Dataset of Stereotyped Prompts for Counterfactual Fairness Assessment of LLMs

Large Language Models (LLMs) now serve as the foundation for a wide range of applications, from conversational assistants to decision support tools, making the issue of fairness in their results increasingly important. Previous studies have shown that LLM outputs can shift when prompts reference different demographic groups, even when intent and semantic content remain constant. However, existing resources for probing such disparities rely primarily on small, template-based counterfactual examples or fixed sentence pairs. These benchmarks offer limited linguistic diversity, narrow topical coverage, and little support for analyzing how communicative intent affects model behavior. To address these limitations, we introduce SCOPE (Stereotype-COnditioned Prompts for Evaluation), a large-scale dataset of counterfactual prompt pairs designed to enable systematic investigation of group-sensitive behavior in LLMs. SCOPE contains 241,280 prompts organized into 120,640 counterfactual pairs, each grounded in one of 1,438 topics and spanning nine bias dimensions and 1,536 demographic groups. All prompts are generated under four distinct communicative intents: Question, Recommendation, Direction, and Clarification, ensuring broad coverage of common interaction styles. This resource provides a controlled, semantically aligned, and intent-aware basis for evaluating fairness, robustness, and counterfactual consistency.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Once Upon a Team: Investigating Bias in LLM-Driven Software Team Composition and Task Allocation

LLMs are increasingly used to boost productivity and support software engineering tasks. However, when applied to socially sensitive decisions such as team composition and task allocation, they raise concerns of fairness. Prior studies have revealed that LLMs may reproduce stereotypes; however, these analyses remain exploratory and examine sensitive attributes in isolation. This study investigates whether LLMs exhibit bias in team composition and task assignment by analyzing the combined effects of candidates' country and pronouns. Using three LLMs and 3,000 simulated decisions, we find systematic disparities: demographic attributes significantly shaped both selection likelihood and task allocation, even when accounting for expertise-related factors. Task distributions further reflected stereotypes, with technical and leadership roles unevenly assigned across groups. Our findings indicate that LLMs exacerbate demographic inequities in software engineering contexts, underscoring the need for fairness-aware assessment.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Toward Systematic Counterfactual Fairness Evaluation of Large Language Models: The CAFFE Framework

Nowadays, Large Language Models (LLMs) are foundational components of modern software systems. As their influence grows, concerns about fairness have become increasingly pressing. Prior work has proposed metamorphic testing to detect fairness issues, applying input transformations to uncover inconsistencies in model behavior. This paper introduces an alternative perspective for testing counterfactual fairness in LLMs, proposing a structured and intent-aware framework coined CAFFE (Counterfactual Assessment Framework for Fairness Evaluation). Inspired by traditional non-functional testing, CAFFE (1) formalizes LLM-Fairness test cases through explicitly defined components, including prompt intent, conversational context, input variants, expected fairness thresholds, and test environment configuration, (2) assists testers by automatically generating targeted test data, and (3) evaluates model responses using semantic similarity metrics. Our experiments, conducted on three different architectural families of LLM, demonstrate that CAFFE achieves broader bias coverage and more reliable detection of unfair behavior than existing metamorphic approaches.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

REST in Pieces: RESTful Design Rule Violations in Student-Built Web Apps

In Computer Science Bachelor's programs, software quality is often underemphasized due to limited time and a focus on foundational skills, leaving many students unprepared for industry expectations. To better understand the typical quality of student code and inform both education and hiring practices, we analyze 40 full-stack web applications developed in a third-year Web Technologies course. Using an automated static analysis pipeline, we assess adherence to REST API design rules. Results reveal frequent violations of foundational conventions, such as missing hyphens in endpoint paths (98%), incorrect pluralization (88%), and misuse of HTTP methods (83%). These findings highlight the need for more focused instruction on API design and support the adoption of automated tools to improve code quality in student projects.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2023

Test Code Refactoring Unveiled: Where and How Does It Affect Test Code Quality and Effectiveness?

Context. Refactoring has been widely investigated in the past in relation to production code quality, yet still little is known on how developers apply refactoring on test code. Specifically, there is still a lack of investigation into how developers typically refactor test code and its effects on test code quality and effectiveness. Objective. This paper presents a research agenda aimed to bridge this gap of knowledge by investigating (1) whether test refactoring actually targets test classes affected by quality and effectiveness concerns and (2) the extent to which refactoring contributes to the improvement of test code quality and effectiveness. Method. We plan to conduct an exploratory mining software repository study to collect test refactoring data of open-source Java projects from GitHub and statistically analyze them in combination with quality metrics, test smells, and code/mutation coverage indicators. Furthermore, we will measure how refactoring operations impact the quality and effectiveness of test code.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2022

Machine Learning-Based Test Smell Detection

Context: Test smells are symptoms of sub-optimal design choices adopted when developing test cases. Previous studies have proved their harmfulness for test code maintainability and effectiveness. Therefore, researchers have been proposing automated, heuristic-based techniques to detect them. However, the performance of such detectors is still limited and dependent on thresholds to be tuned. Objective: We propose the design and experimentation of a novel test smell detection approach based on machine learning to detect four test smells. Method: We plan to develop the largest dataset of manually-validated test smells. This dataset will be leveraged to train six machine learners and assess their capabilities in within- and cross-project scenarios. Finally, we plan to compare our approach with state-of-the-art heuristic-based techniques.

cs.SE↗