SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Valerio Bo

Publications and source records attributed to Valerio Bo.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Visual Proactivity: Enhancing Human-Robot Collaboration Through Intent Communication

As robots transition from performing repetitive tasks to collaborating with humans, understanding human intent becomes crucial to effective interaction. Anticipation enables robots to predict human actions, while proactivity allows them to take initiative and guide human behavior toward optimal outcomes. Although research has largely focused on how robots infer and respond to human intentions, less attention has been paid to how robots communicate their own intent. This paper introduces visual proactivity, a novel, simple yet effective approach that enables robots to communicate their intentions through visual feedback, influencing human behavior and enhancing transparency and fluency. We develop and evaluate proactive robotic behaviors in a human-to-robot handover scenario, where a user study validates human perception of reactive, anticipatory, and proactive behaviors. The results demonstrate that effective visual proactivity fosters better alignment and coordination, paving the way for more intuitive human-robot collaboration.

cs.RO

When Should Robots Intervene? Balancing Engagement and Intrusiveness in Human-Robot Interaction

Designing effective Human-Robot Interaction in task-oriented settings requires carefully balancing user engagement with socially acceptable levels of robot intrusiveness. In this paper, we examine how different robot intervention strategies shape user experience, interaction dynamics, perceived intrusiveness, and sense of support. We compare two approaches: a continuous engagement-seeking robot strategy, and a context-aware strategy that selectively intervenes based on the user's state and task context. Both approaches rely on multimodal behavioral cues, including body orientation and attentional signals, to guide robot actions. We evaluate these strategies in a user study with 32 participants performing a task in a simulated hospital environment. Our findings show that higher interaction frequency does not necessarily lead to better engagement. Instead, we observe a systematic trade-off between perceived support and intrusiveness, influenced by factors such as physical proximity and user effort. These results provide empirical evidence that effective engagement in HRI depends on adaptive, context-sensitive intervention policies.

cs.RO

Understanding Engagement and Intrusiveness in Assistive Human-Robot Interaction Using Individual Traits

Robot assistance is particularly crucial in unfamiliar tasks, where users must understand task requirements while coordinating with the robot. Previous research offers mixed evidence on the role of robot proxemics in user engagement: some studies suggest closer proximity enhances interaction, while others report it can feel intrusive. In this work, we argue that perceptions of intrusiveness depend not only on proxemics but also on the frequency of robot interventions, and are strongly influenced by individual traits such as personality and demographics. We conducted an experiment with 32 participants who interacted with two assistive robots that provided similar task support but differed in their intervention strategies. Results indicate that overall engagement remains stable across conditions, yet affective responses and perceived intrusiveness vary significantly with personality traits. Moreover, personality shapes interaction dynamics differently depending on the robot's behavior. These findings emphasize that effective human-robot interaction should account for individual differences, tailoring robot behavior to maintain engagement while respecting each user's unique affective and behavioral profile.

cs.RO