Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Vamshi Nallaguntla

Publications and source records attributed to Vamshi Nallaguntla.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

SPADE: A Multilingual Dataset for Speech Partial Deepfake Detection and Localization

Recent improvements in voice-cloning speech generation systems raise concerns about misuse by malicious actors to impersonate others and spread misinformation. Detecting such tampering is difficult, since deepfakes in the wild may be created by different generative models in a wide range of languages. Furthermore, the speech audio may also only be partially modified, presenting a different and potentially more challenging task than detecting fully-synthetic speech waveforms. To enable further research in this direction, we propose a multilingual dataset for detection and localization of partially edited speech samples. Our dataset includes speech in 12 languages, generated by up to five systems per language, and includes both a training set as well as an evaluation benchmark. To showcase the utility of our proposed dataset, we train localization models of existing architectures and study generalization across three axes: across different languages, across different speech synthesis and editing systems, and across different acoustic environments. Our results show that localization models almost always generalize poorly to speech edited by systems not seen during training. On the other hand, generalization to edited speech in unseen languages still degrades performance but to a lesser extent. We also augment our testing sets with noise to evaluate generalization across acoustic environments, and find that performance of localization models degrade significantly when tested on different acoustic conditions. All together, our results imply that existing deepfake speech detection methods are insufficient for reliably detecting edit-based speech deepfakes in various scenarios unseen during training. SPADE is publicly available on HuggingFace.

eess.AS↗

What You Train Is What You Get: Gender Bias, Training Composition, and Post-Hoc Mitigation in Audio Deepfake Detection

Audio deepfake detection models determine whether speech is genuine or artificially generated, but high overall accuracy can mask substantial performance disparities across demographic groups. In this work, we investigate gender bias in audio deepfake detection using the ASVspoof5 dataset. We use ASVspoof5 under a controlled custom split designed to isolate gender-composition effects. We train attack-specific models on nine training sets with different gender compositions, ranging from female-only to male-only. We use a ResNet18 classifier with LogSpectrogram and WavLM-Base+ features, and we evaluated six post-hoc threshold calibration methods. Experimental results show that training data composition strongly predicts bias direction, with the underrepresented gender performing worse at test time. WavLM-Base+ features are shown to produce gender performance gaps 3.0 to 4.3 times larger than LogSpectrogram under identical training conditions, and balanced training is found to reduce LogSpectrogram bias but leave WavLM bias largely intact. Moreover, all six calibration strategies, including Oracle calibration with full test-set label access, leave the Equal Error Rate gap unchanged at 1.317 pp, confirming that threshold adjustment cannot correct underlying score distribution disparities. Overall, these findings suggest that gender fairness in audio deepfake detection must be addressed at training time, as post-hoc methods can only partially mitigate the resulting disparities

cs.SD↗

Phoneme-Level Deepfake Detection Across Emotional Conditions Using Self-Supervised Embeddings

Recent advances in emotional voice conversion (EVC) have enabled the generation of expressive synthetic speech, raising new concerns in audio deepfake detection. Existing approaches treat speech as a homogeneous signal and largely overlook its internal phonetic structure, limiting their interpretability in emotionally conditioned settings. In this work, we propose a phoneme-level framework to analyze emotionally manipulated synthetic speech using real and EVC-generated speech under matched emotional conditions with shared transcripts, phoneme-aligned TextGrids, and WavLM-based embeddings. Our results show that phoneme behavior varies across categories, with complex vowels and fricatives exhibiting higher divergence while simpler phonemes remain more stable. Phonemes with larger distributional differences are also found to be more easily detected, consistently across multiple emotions and synthesis systems. These findings demonstrate that phoneme-level analysis is an effective and interpretable approach for detecting emotionally manipulated synthetic speech.

cs.SD↗

PhonemeDF: A Synthetic Speech Dataset for Audio Deepfake Detection and Naturalness Evaluation

The growing sophistication of speech generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) has introduced new challenges in audio deepfake detection. Text-to-speech (TTS) and voice conversion (VC) technologies can create highly convincing synthetic speech with naturalness and intelligibility. This poses serious threats to voice biometric security and to systems designed to combat the spread of spoken misinformation, where synthetic voices may be used to disseminate false or malicious content. While interest in AI-generated speech has increased, resources for evaluating naturalness at the phoneme level remain limited. In this work, we address this gap by presenting the Phoneme-Level DeepFake dataset (PhonemeDF), comprising parallel real and synthetic speech segmented at the phoneme level. Real speech samples are derived from a subset of LibriSpeech, while synthetic samples are generated using four TTS and three VC systems. For each system, phoneme-aligned TextGrid files are obtained using the Montreal Forced Aligner (MFA). We compute the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) between real and synthetic phoneme distributions to quantify fidelity and establish a ranking based on similarity to natural speech. Our findings show a clear correlation between the KLD of real and synthetic phoneme distributions and the performance of classifiers trained to distinguish them, suggesting that KLD can serve as an indicator of the most discriminative phonemes for deepfake detection.

cs.SD↗