arXiv subjects

Vasileios Nakos

Publications and source records attributed to Vasileios Nakos.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Robustifying Sparse Matrix Multiplication

In the seminal sparse matrix multiplication problem the goal is to compute the product of two $n \times n$ matrices when the matrices are sparse, i.e., when the number of nonzeros in the input matrices $m_{in}$ and/or the number of nonzeros in the output matrix $m_{out}$ are much smaller than $n^2$. In this paper, we explore the generalized problem of (approximately) computing the $k$ largest output entries, with an approximation error dependent solely on the smaller entries -- from the viewpoint of sparse recovery, this can be seen as a robust variant of sparse matrix multiplication. Despite the substantial research dedicated to sparse matrix multiplication, almost no existing algorithms are robust in this sense. The one exception is Pagh's algorithm in time $\widetilde O(m_{in} + nk)$ [ITCS'12], and it remained open whether other algorithms can be similarly made robust. Our principal contribution is a black-box reduction from robust sparse matrix multiplication to conventional sparse matrix multiplication with only polylogarithmic overhead. Specifically, we show that any sparse matrix multiplication algorithm with running time $T(n, m_{in}, m_{out})$ can be transformed into a robust algorithm running in time $\widetilde O(T(n, m_{in}, k))$. This reduction leverages an extensive toolkit from sparse recovery, and intriguingly, also involves solving a knapsack-type problem. By plugging in the state-of-the-art algorithm for sparse matrix multiplication by Abboud, Bringmann, Fischer, and Künnemann [SODA'24], we achieve significantly improved bounds such as $O((m_{in} + k)^{1.346})$. Notably, in the regime where $k \geq m_{in}^{1.762}$, our reduction culminates in an almost-optimal $k^{1+o(1)}$-time algorithm.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Listing Even Cycles Faster than the Submodular-Width Barrier

A classic result of Alon, Yuster, and Zwick (AYZ, Algorithmica 1997) shows that all $2k$-cycles in an $m$-edge graph can be listed in $\tilde O(m^{2-1/k}+t)$ time, where $t$ is the output size. This bound underlies the {\em submodular width} of Marx (JACM 2013) and the PANDA framework of Abo Khamis, Ngo, and Suciu (PODS 2017), which extend AYZ to arbitrary conjunctive queries with degree constraints. A central open question is whether combinatorial algorithms can beat the submodular-width barrier. Bringmann and Gorbachev (STOC 2025) gave lower-bound evidence that submodular width may be optimal for general conjunctive queries under combinatorial algorithms. The picture changes for $2k$-cycles on undirected graphs, whose queries have self-joins and symmetric EDBs: recent works improve on AYZ for even-cycle detection and listing. Pinning down the complexity of $C_{2k}$-detection and listing is thus a natural step toward overcoming the submodular-width barrier for such queries. For detection, Dahlgaard, Knudsen, and St{ö}ckel (STOC 2017) solved $C_{2k}$-detection in $\tilde O(m^{2k/(k+1)})$ time. Listing is harder. Jin and Xu (STOC 2023), and independently Abboud, Khoury, Leibowitz, and Safier (FSTTCS 2023), listed 4-cycles in $\tilde O(m^{4/3}+t)$ time; Vassilevska~Williams and Westover (ITCS 2025) listed 6-cycles in $\tilde O(m^{8/5}+t)$ time, improving the AYZ bounds of $\tilde O(m^{3/2})$ and $\tilde O(m^{5/3})$. The general case has remained open for 30 years. Building on these works, we list $2k$-cycles in $\tilde O(m^{(2k^2-k+1)/(k^2+1)}+t)$ time, improving AYZ for every $k\geq 3$. The key ingredient is an \emph{asymmetric supersaturation} result for even cycles. Our algorithms use only join and project operators over multiple tree-decomposition plans, making them naturally implementable in database systems, in contrast to prior BFS-based graph approaches.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2025

$\ell_2/\ell_2$ Sparse Recovery via Weighted Hypergraph Peeling

We demonstrate that the best $k$-sparse approximation of a length-$n$ vector can be recovered within a $(1+ε)$-factor approximation in $O((k/ε) \log n)$ time using a non-adaptive linear sketch with $O((k/ε) \log n)$ rows and $O(\log n)$ column sparsity. This improves the running time of the fastest-known sketch [Nakos, Song; STOC '19] by a factor of $\log n$, and is optimal for a wide range of parameters. Our algorithm is simple and likely to be practical, with the analysis built on a new technique we call weighted hypergraph peeling. Our method naturally extends known hypergraph peeling processes (as in the analysis of Invertible Bloom Filters) to a setting where edges and nodes have (possibly correlated) weights.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Information Theory Strikes Back: New Development in the Theory of Cardinality Estimation

Estimating the cardinality of the output of a query is a fundamental problem in database query processing. In this article, we overview a recently published contribution that casts the cardinality estimation problem as linear optimization and computes guaranteed upper bounds on the cardinality of the output for any full conjunctive query. The objective of the linear program is to maximize the joint entropy of the query variables and its constraints are the Shannon information inequalities and new information inequalities involving $\ell_p$-norms of the degree sequences of the join attributes. The bounds based on arbitrary norms can be asymptotically lower than those based on the $\ell_1$ and $\ell_\infty$ norms, which capture the cardinalities and respectively the max-degrees of the input relations. They come with a matching query evaluation algorithm, are computable in exponential time in the query size, and are provably tight when each degree sequence is on one join attribute.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2024

Beating Bellman's Algorithm for Subset Sum

Bellman's algorithm for Subset Sum is one of the earliest and simplest examples of dynamic programming, dating back to 1957. For a given set of $n$ integers $X$ and a target $t$, it computes the set of subset sums $\mathcal S(X, t)$ (i.e., the set of integers $s \in [0\ldots t]$ for which there is a subset of $X$ summing to $s$) in time $O(|\mathcal S(X, t)| \cdot n)$. Since then, it has been an important question whether Bellman's seminal algorithm can be improved. This question is addressed in many recent works. And yet, while some algorithms improve upon Bellman's algorithm in specific parameter regimes, such as Bringmann's $\tilde O(t + n)$-time algorithm [SODA '17] and Bringmann and Nakos' $\tilde O(|\mathcal S(X, t)|^{4/3})$-time algorithm [STOC '20], none of the known algorithms beats Bellman's algorithm in all regimes. In particular, it remained open whether Subset Sum is in time $\tilde O(|\mathcal S(X, t)| \cdot n^{1-ε})$ (for some $ε> 0$). In this work we positively resolve this question and design an algorithm that outperforms Bellman's algorithm in all regimes. Our algorithm runs in time $\tilde O(|\mathcal S(X, t)| \cdot \sqrt{n})$, thus improving the time complexity by a factor of nearly $\sqrt n$. Our key innovation is the use of a result from additive combinatorics, which has not been applied in an algorithmic context before and which we believe to be of further independent interest for algorithm design. To demonstrate the broader applicability of our approach, we extend our ideas to a variant of Subset Sum on vectors as well as to Unbounded Subset Sum.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Targeted Least Cardinality Candidate Key for Relational Databases

Functional dependencies (FDs) are a central theme in databases, playing a major role in the design of database schemas and the optimization of queries. In this work, we introduce the {\it targeted least cardinality candidate key problem} (TCAND). This problem is defined over a set of functional dependencies $F$ and a target variable set $T \subseteq V$, and it aims to find the smallest set $X \subseteq V$ such that the FD $X \to T$ can be derived from $F$. The TCAND problem generalizes the well-known NP-hard problem of finding the least cardinality candidate key~\cite{lucchesi1978candidate}, which has been previously demonstrated to be at least as difficult as the set cover problem. We present an integer programming (IP) formulation for the TCAND problem, analogous to a layered set cover problem. We analyze its linear programming (LP) relaxation from two perspectives: we propose two approximation algorithms and investigate the integrality gap. Our findings indicate that the approximation upper bounds for our algorithms are not significantly improvable through LP rounding, a notable distinction from the standard set cover problem. Additionally, we discover that a generalization of the TCAND problem is equivalent to a variant of the set cover problem, named red-blue set cover~\cite{carr1999red}, which cannot be approximated within a sub-polynomial factor in polynomial time under plausible conjectures~\cite{chlamtavc2023approximating}. Despite the extensive history surrounding the issue of identifying the least cardinality candidate key, our research contributes new theoretical insights, novel algorithms, and demonstrates that the general TCAND problem poses complexities beyond those encountered in the set cover problem.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2024

Join Size Bounds using Lp-Norms on Degree Sequences

Estimating the output size of a query is a fundamental yet longstanding problem in database query processing. Traditional cardinality estimators used by database systems can routinely underestimate the true output size by orders of magnitude, which leads to significant system performance penalty. Recently, upper bounds have been proposed that are based on information inequalities and incorporate sizes and max-degrees from input relations, yet they their main benefit is limited to cyclic queries, because they degenerate to rather trivial formulas on acyclic queries. We introduce a significant extension of the upper bounds, by incorporating $\ell_p$-norms of the degree sequences of join attributes. Our bounds are significantly lower than previously known bounds, even when applied to acyclic queries. These bounds are also based on information theory, they come with a matching query evaluation algorithm, are computable in exponential time in the query size, and are provably tight when all degrees are "simple".

cs.DB↗

arXiv2023

Top-k-Convolution and the Quest for Near-Linear Output-Sensitive Subset Sum

In the classical Subset Sum problem we are given a set $X$ and a target $t$, and the task is to decide whether there exists a subset of $X$ which sums to $t$. A recent line of research has resulted in $\tilde{O}(t)$-time algorithms, which are (near-)optimal under popular complexity-theoretic assumptions. On the other hand, the standard dynamic programming algorithm runs in time $O(n \cdot |\mathcal{S}(X,t)|)$, where $\mathcal{S}(X,t)$ is the set of all subset sums of $X$ that are smaller than $t$. Furthermore, all known pseudopolynomial algorithms actually solve a stronger task, since they actually compute the whole set $\mathcal{S}(X,t)$. As the aforementioned two running times are incomparable, in this paper we ask whether one can achieve the best of both worlds: running time $\tilde{O}(|\mathcal{S}(X,t)|)$. In particular, we ask whether $\mathcal{S}(X,t)$ can be computed in near-linear time in the output-size. Using a diverse toolkit containing techniques such as color coding, sparse recovery, and sumset estimates, we make considerable progress towards this question and design an algorithm running in time $\tilde{O}(|\mathcal{S}(X,t)|^{4/3})$. Central to our approach is the study of top-$k$-convolution, a natural problem of independent interest: given sparse polynomials with non-negative coefficients, compute the lowest $k$ non-zero monomials of their product. We design an algorithm running in time $\tilde{O}(k^{4/3})$, by a combination of sparse convolution and sumset estimates considered in Additive Combinatorics. Moreover, we provide evidence that going beyond some of the barriers we have faced requires either an algorithmic breakthrough or possibly new techniques from Additive Combinatorics on how to pass from information on restricted sumsets to information on unrestricted sumsets.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Almost-Optimal Sublinear-Time Edit Distance in the Low Distance Regime

We revisit the task of computing the edit distance in sublinear time. In the $(k,K)$-gap edit distance problem the task is to distinguish whether the edit distance of two strings is at most $k$ or at least $K$. It has been established by Goldenberg, Krauthgamer and Saha (FOCS '19), with improvements by Kociumaka and Saha (FOCS '20), that the $(k,k^2)$-gap problem can be solved in time $\widetilde O(n/k+\operatorname{poly}(k))$. One of the most natural questions in this line of research is whether the $(k,k^2)$-gap is best-possible for the running time $\widetilde O(n/k+\operatorname{poly}(k))$. In this work we answer this question by significantly improving the gap. Specifically, we show that in time $O(n/k+\operatorname{poly}(k))$ we can even solve the $(k,k^{1+o(1)})$-gap problem. This is the first algorithm that breaks the $(k,k^2)$-gap in this running time. Our algorithm is almost optimal in the following sense: In the low distance regime ($k\le n^{0.19}$) our running time becomes $O(n/k)$, which matches a known $n/k^{1+o(1)}$ lower bound for the $(k,k^{1+o(1)})$-gap problem up to lower order factors. Our result also reveals a surprising similarity of Hamming distance and edit distance in the low distance regime: For both, the $(k,k^{1+o(1)})$-gap problem has time complexity $n/k^{1\pm o(1)}$ for small $k$. In contrast to previous work, which employed a subsampled variant of the Landau-Vishkin algorithm, we instead build upon the algorithm of Andoni, Krauthgamer and Onak (FOCS '10). We first simplify their approach and then show how to to effectively prune their computation tree in order to obtain a sublinear-time algorithm in the given time bound. Towards that, we use a variety of structural insights on the (local and global) patterns that can emerge during this process and design appropriate property testers to effectively detect these patterns.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Traversing the FFT Computation Tree for Dimension-Independent Sparse Fourier Transforms

We consider the well-studied Sparse Fourier transform problem, where one aims to quickly recover an approximately Fourier $k$-sparse vector $\widehat{x} \in \mathbb{C}^{n^d}$ from observing its time domain representation $x$. In the exact $k$-sparse case the best known dimension-independent algorithm runs in near cubic time in $k$ and it is unclear whether a faster algorithm like in low dimensions is possible. Beyond that, all known approaches either suffer from an exponential dependence on the dimension $d$ or can only tolerate a trivial amount of noise. This is in sharp contrast with the classical FFT of Cooley and Tukey, which is stable and completely insensitive to the dimension of the input vector: its runtime is $O(N\log N)$ in any dimension $d$ for $N=n^d$. Our work aims to address the above issues. First, we provide a translation/reduction of the exactly $k$-sparse FT problem to a concrete tree exploration task which asks to recover $k$ leaves in a full binary tree under certain exploration rules. Subsequently, we provide (a) an almost quadratic in $k$ time algorithm for this task, and (b) evidence that a strongly subquadratic time for Sparse FT via this approach is likely impossible. We achieve the latter by proving a conditional quadratic time lower bound on sparse polynomial multipoint evaluation (the classical non-equispaced sparse FT) which is a core routine in the aforementioned translation. Thus, our results combined can be viewed as an almost complete understanding of this approach, which is the only known approach that yields sublinear time dimension-independent Sparse FT algorithms. Subsequently, we provide a robustification of our algorithm, yielding a robust cubic time algorithm under bounded $\ell_2$ noise. This requires proving new structural properties of the recently introduced adaptive aliasing filters combined with a variety of new techniques and ideas.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Improved Sublinear-Time Edit Distance for Preprocessed Strings

We study the problem of approximating the edit distance of two strings in sublinear time, in a setting where one or both string(s) are preprocessed, as initiated by Goldenberg, Rubinstein, Saha (STOC '20). Specifically, in the $(k, K)$-gap edit distance problem, the goal is to distinguish whether the edit distance of two strings is at most $k$ or at least $K$. We obtain the following results: * After preprocessing one string in time $n^{1+o(1)}$, we can solve $(k, k \cdot n^{o(1)})$-gap edit distance in time $(n/k + k) \cdot n^{o(1)}$. * After preprocessing both strings separately in time $n^{1+o(1)}$, we can solve $(k, k \cdot n^{o(1)})$-gap edit distance in time $k \cdot n^{o(1)}$. Both results improve upon some previously best known result, with respect to either the gap or the query time or the preprocessing time. Our algorithms build on the framework by Andoni, Krauthgamer and Onak (FOCS '10) and the recent sublinear-time algorithm by Bringmann, Cassis, Fischer and Nakos (STOC '22). We replace many complicated parts in their algorithm by faster and simpler solutions which exploit the preprocessing.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

On the Approximability of Multistage Min-Sum Set Cover

We investigate the polynomial-time approximability of the multistage version of Min-Sum Set Cover ($\mathrm{DSSC}$), a natural and intriguing generalization of the classical List Update problem. In $\mathrm{DSSC}$, we maintain a sequence of permutations $(π^0, π^1, \ldots, π^T)$ on $n$ elements, based on a sequence of requests $(R^1, \ldots, R^T)$. We aim to minimize the total cost of updating $π^{t-1}$ to $π^{t}$, quantified by the Kendall tau distance $\mathrm{D}_{\mathrm{KT}}(π^{t-1}, π^t)$, plus the total cost of covering each request $R^t$ with the current permutation $π^t$, quantified by the position of the first element of $R^t$ in $π^t$. Using a reduction from Set Cover, we show that $\mathrm{DSSC}$ does not admit an $O(1)$-approximation, unless $\mathrm{P} = \mathrm{NP}$, and that any $o(\log n)$ (resp. $o(r)$) approximation to $\mathrm{DSSC}$ implies a sublogarithmic (resp. $o(r)$) approximation to Set Cover (resp. where each element appears at most $r$ times). Our main technical contribution is to show that $\mathrm{DSSC}$ can be approximated in polynomial-time within a factor of $O(\log^2 n)$ in general instances, by randomized rounding, and within a factor of $O(r^2)$, if all requests have cardinality at most $r$, by deterministic rounding.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Deterministic and Las Vegas Algorithms for Sparse Nonnegative Convolution

Computing the convolution $A\star B$ of two length-$n$ integer vectors $A,B$ is a core problem in several disciplines. It frequently comes up in algorithms for Knapsack, $k$-SUM, All-Pairs Shortest Paths, and string pattern matching problems. For these applications it typically suffices to compute convolutions of nonnegative vectors. This problem can be classically solved in time $O(n\log n)$ using the Fast Fourier Transform. However, often the involved vectors are sparse and hence one could hope for output-sensitive algorithms to compute nonnegative convolutions. This question was raised by Muthukrishnan and solved by Cole and Hariharan (STOC '02) by a randomized algorithm running in near-linear time in the (unknown) output-size $t$. Chan and Lewenstein (STOC '15) presented a deterministic algorithm with a $2^{O(\sqrt{\log t\cdot\log\log n})}$ overhead in running time and the additional assumption that a small superset of the output is given; this assumption was later removed by Bringmann and Nakos (ICALP '21). In this paper we present the first deterministic near-linear-time algorithm for computing sparse nonnegative convolutions. This immediately gives improved deterministic algorithms for the state-of-the-art of output-sensitive Subset Sum, block-mass pattern matching, $N$-fold Boolean convolution, and others, matching up to log-factors the fastest known randomized algorithms for these problems. Our algorithm is a blend of algebraic and combinatorial ideas and techniques. Additionally, we provide two fast Las Vegas algorithms for computing sparse nonnegative convolutions. In particular, we present a simple $O(t\log^2t)$ time algorithm, which is an accessible alternative to Cole and Hariharan's algorithm. We further refine this new algorithm to run in Las Vegas time $O(t\log t\cdot\log\log t)$, matching the running time of the dense case apart from the $\log\log t$ factor.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Sparse Nonnegative Convolution Is Equivalent to Dense Nonnegative Convolution

Computing the convolution $A\star B$ of two length-$n$ vectors $A,B$ is an ubiquitous computational primitive. Applications range from string problems to Knapsack-type problems, and from 3SUM to All-Pairs Shortest Paths. These applications often come in the form of nonnegative convolution, where the entries of $A,B$ are nonnegative integers. The classical algorithm to compute $A\star B$ uses the Fast Fourier Transform and runs in time $O(n\log n)$. However, often $A$ and $B$ satisfy sparsity conditions, and hence one could hope for significant improvements. The ideal goal is an $O(k\log k)$-time algorithm, where $k$ is the number of non-zero elements in the output, i.e., the size of the support of $A\star B$. This problem is referred to as sparse nonnegative convolution, and has received considerable attention in the literature; the fastest algorithms to date run in time $O(k\log^2 n)$. The main result of this paper is the first $O(k\log k)$-time algorithm for sparse nonnegative convolution. Our algorithm is randomized and assumes that the length $n$ and the largest entry of $A$ and $B$ are subexponential in $k$. Surprisingly, we can phrase our algorithm as a reduction from the sparse case to the dense case of nonnegative convolution, showing that, under some mild assumptions, sparse nonnegative convolution is equivalent to dense nonnegative convolution for constant-error randomized algorithms. Specifically, if $D(n)$ is the time to convolve two nonnegative length-$n$ vectors with success probability $2/3$, and $S(k)$ is the time to convolve two nonnegative vectors with output size $k$ with success probability $2/3$, then $S(k)=O(D(k)+k(\log\log k)^2)$. Our approach uses a variety of new techniques in combination with some old machinery from linear sketching and structured linear algebra, as well as new insights on linear hashing, the most classical hash function.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Fast $n$-fold Boolean Convolution via Additive Combinatorics

We consider the problem of computing the Boolean convolution (with wraparound) of $n$~vectors of dimension $m$, or, equivalently, the problem of computing the sumset $A_1+A_2+\ldots+A_n$ for $A_1,\ldots,A_n \subseteq \mathbb{Z}_m$. Boolean convolution formalizes the frequent task of combining two subproblems, where the whole problem has a solution of size $k$ if for some $i$ the first subproblem has a solution of size~$i$ and the second subproblem has a solution of size $k-i$. Our problem formalizes a natural generalization, namely combining solutions of $n$ subproblems subject to a modular constraint. This simultaneously generalises Modular Subset Sum and Boolean Convolution (Sumset Computation). Although nearly optimal algorithms are known for special cases of this problem, not even tiny improvements are known for the general case. We almost resolve the computational complexity of this problem, shaving essentially a factor of $n$ from the running time of previous algorithms. Specifically, we present a \emph{deterministic} algorithm running in \emph{almost} linear time with respect to the input plus output size $k$. We also present a \emph{Las Vegas} algorithm running in \emph{nearly} linear expected time with respect to the input plus output size $k$. Previously, no deterministic or randomized $o(nk)$ algorithm was known. At the heart of our approach lies a careful usage of Kneser's theorem from Additive Combinatorics, and a new deterministic almost linear output-sensitive algorithm for non-negative sparse convolution. In total, our work builds a solid toolbox that could be of independent interest.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Predicting Positive and Negative Links with Noisy Queries: Theory & Practice

Social networks involve both positive and negative relationships, which can be captured in signed graphs. The {\em edge sign prediction problem} aims to predict whether an interaction between a pair of nodes will be positive or negative. We provide theoretical results for this problem that motivate natural improvements to recent heuristics. The edge sign prediction problem is related to correlation clustering; a positive relationship means being in the same cluster. We consider the following model for two clusters: we are allowed to query any pair of nodes whether they belong to the same cluster or not, but the answer to the query is corrupted with some probability $0<q<\frac{1}{2}$. Let $δ=1-2q$ be the bias. We provide an algorithm that recovers all signs correctly with high probability in the presence of noise with $O(\frac{n\log n}{δ^2}+\frac{\log^2 n}{δ^6})$ queries. This is the best known result for this problem for all but tiny $δ$, improving on the recent work of Mazumdar and Saha \cite{mazumdar2017clustering}. We also provide an algorithm that performs $O(\frac{n\log n}{δ^4})$ queries, and uses breadth first search as its main algorithmic primitive. While both the running time and the number of queries for this algorithm are sub-optimal, our result relies on novel theoretical techniques, and naturally suggests the use of edge-disjoint paths as a feature for predicting signs in online social networks. Correspondingly, we experiment with using edge disjoint $s-t$ paths of short length as a feature for predicting the sign of edge $(s,t)$ in real-world signed networks. Empirical findings suggest that the use of such paths improves the classification accuracy, especially for pairs of nodes with no common neighbors.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Fast and Simple Modular Subset Sum

We revisit the Subset Sum problem over the finite cyclic group $\mathbb{Z}_m$ for some given integer $m$. A series of recent works has provided near-optimal algorithms for this problem under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. Koiliaris and Xu (SODA'17, TALG'19) gave a deterministic algorithm running in time $\tilde{O}(m^{5/4})$, which was later improved to $O(m \log^7 m)$ randomized time by Axiotis et al. (SODA'19). In this work, we present two simple algorithms for the Modular Subset Sum problem running in near-linear time in $m$, both efficiently implementing Bellman's iteration over $\mathbb{Z}_m$. The first one is a randomized algorithm running in time $O(m \log^2 m)$, that is based solely on rolling hash and an elementary data-structure for prefix sums; to illustrate its simplicity we provide a short and efficient implementation of the algorithm in Python. Our second solution is a deterministic algorithm running in time $O(m\ \mathrm{polylog}\ m)$, that uses dynamic data structures for string manipulation. We further show that the techniques developed in this work can also lead to simple algorithms for the All Pairs Non-Decreasing Paths Problem (APNP) on undirected graphs, matching the near-optimal running time of $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ provided in the recent work of Duan et al. (ICALP'19).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

A Fine-Grained Perspective on Approximating Subset Sum and Partition

Approximating Subset Sum is a classic and fundamental problem in computer science and mathematical optimization. The state-of-the-art approximation scheme for Subset Sum computes a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation in time $\tilde{O}(\min\{n/\varepsilon, n+1/\varepsilon^2\})$ [Gens, Levner'78, Kellerer et al.'97]. In particular, a $(1-1/n)$-approximation can be computed in time $O(n^2)$. We establish a connection to Min-Plus-Convolution, a problem that is of particular interest in fine-grained complexity theory and can be solved naively in time $O(n^2)$. Our main result is that computing a $(1-1/n)$-approximation for Subset Sum is subquadratically equivalent to Min-Plus-Convolution. Thus, assuming the Min-Plus-Convolution conjecture from fine-grained complexity theory, there is no approximation scheme for Subset Sum with strongly subquadratic dependence on $n$ and $1/\varepsilon$. In the other direction, our reduction allows us to transfer known lower order improvements from Min-Plus-Convolution to Subset Sum, which yields a mildly subquadratic randomized approximation scheme. This adds the first approximation problem to the list of problems that are equivalent to Min-Plus-Convolution. For the related Partition problem, an important special case of Subset Sum, the state of the art is a randomized approximation scheme running in time $\tilde{O}(n+1/\varepsilon^{5/3})$ [Mucha~et~al.'19]. We adapt our reduction from Subset Sum to Min-Plus-Convolution to obtain a related reduction from Partition to Min-Plus-Convolution. This yields an improved approximation scheme for Partition running in time $\tilde{O}(n + 1/\varepsilon^{3/2})$. Our algorithm is the first deterministic approximation scheme for Partition that breaks the quadratic barrier.

cs.DS↗