Vasilis Vouvoutsis | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Exploring the connection between coding habits and cognitive styles in malware developers

Malware research primarily studies the results, the methods, and the impact. Even from an offensive security perspective, what is examined is the method, not the development strategy of the offender. This study investigates the behavioral signatures and coding patterns embedded in the malware source code. By analyzing a large corpus of leaked malware code and comparing it with carefully selected benign open-source software, we apply static application security testing and compute multiple software metrics. Based on cognitive psychology and criminological theories, our work interprets differences in code structure and quality as behavioral indicators, reflecting distinct motivational structures, risk tolerances, and development strategies of malware authors compared to benign software developers. Our findings reveal that malware code is generally smaller, less documented, and exhibits higher cyclomatic complexity per function, with reduced use of abstraction mechanisms such as classes and closures. Vulnerability analysis further reveals that malware exhibits more issues of the types that benign code typically avoids, suggesting a minimal investment in secure development practices. These patterns imply a development style optimized for expedience, operational secrecy, and evasion rather than long-term maintainability. Nonetheless, the code quality metrics indicate that it does not deviate significantly from benign software enough to be distinctive. By framing code metrics as proxies for behavioral signals and strategic choices, we demonstrate how quantitative software analysis can enrich behavioral cybersecurity research, offering new insights into the practices and priorities of malware developers. Our results pave the way for further research in the behavioral profiling of cyber offenders.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2022

On the Effectiveness of Binary Emulation in Malware Classification

Malware authors are continuously evolving their code base to include counter-analysis methods that can significantly hinder their detection and blocking. While the execution of malware in a sandboxed environment may provide a lot of insightful feedback about what the malware actually does in a machine, anti-virtualisation and hooking evasion methods may allow malware to bypass such detection methods. The main objective of this work is to complement sandbox execution with the use of binary emulation frameworks. The core idea is to exploit the fact that binary emulation frameworks may quickly test samples quicker than a sandbox environment as they do not need to open a whole new virtual machine to execute the binary. While with this approach, we lose the granularity of the data that can be collected through a sandbox, due to scalability issues, one may need to simply determine whether a file is malicious or to which malware family it belongs. To this end, we record the API calls that are performed and use them to explore the efficacy of using them as features for binary and multiclass classification. Our extensive experiments with real-world malware illustrate that this approach is very accurate, achieving state-of-the art outcomes with a statistically robust set of classification experiments while simultaneously having a relatively low computational overhead compared to traditional sandbox approaches. In fact, we compare the binary analysis results with a commercial sandbox, and our classification outperforms it at the expense of the fine-grained results that a sandbox provides.

cs.CR↗