arXiv subjects

Vianey Camacho

Publications and source records attributed to Vianey Camacho.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Gravity or turbulence? VII. The Schmidt-Kennicutt law, the star formation efficiency, and the mass density of clusters from gravitational collapse rather than turbulent support

We explore the Schmidt-Kennicutt (SK) relations and the star formation efficiency per free-fall time ($ε_{\rm ff}$), mirroring observational studies, in numerical simulations of filamentary molecular clouds undergoing gravitational contraction. We find that (a)~collapsing clouds accurately replicate the observed SK relations for galactic clouds and (b)~$ε_{\rm ff}$ is small and constant in space and in time, with values similar to those found in local clouds. We propose that this constancy arises from the similar radial scaling of the free-fall time ($τ_{\rm ff}$) and the internal mass in density structures with spherically-averaged density profiles near $r^{-2}$. We additionally show that (c)~the star formation rate (SFR) increases rapidly in time; (d)~the low values of $ε_{\rm ff}$ result from evaluating $τ_{\rm ff}$ and the characteristic star-formation time scale over different time intervals, combined with the increasing SFR, and (e)~the fact that star clusters are significantly denser than the gas clumps from which they form is a natural consequence of the rapidly increasing SFR, the continuous replenishment of the star-forming gas by the accretion flow, and the near $r^{-2}$ density profile induced by the collapse. Finally, we argue that interpreting $ε_{\rm ff}$ as an efficiency is problematic since it is not bounded by unity, and because the gas mass in clouds evolves. Instead, we propose that viewing $ε_{\rm ff}$ as the ratio of the actual SFR to the gas free-fall rate. In summary, our results show that the SK relation, the low values of $ε_{\rm ff}$, and the mass density of stellar clusters arise naturally from gravitational contraction.

astro-ph.GA↗

arXiv2025

The Turbulent Support (TS) and Global Hierarchical Collapse (GHC) models for molecular clouds compared. Differences, convergence, and myths

We provide a detailed comparison between the ``turbulent support'' (TS) and ``global hierarchical collapse'' (GHC) models for molecular clouds and star formation, their respective interpretations of the observational data, the features they share, and suggested tests and observations to discern between them. Also, we clarify common misconceptions in recent literature about the global and hierarchical nature of the GHC scenario, and briefly discuss the evolution of some aspects of both models toward convergence. TS assumes that star-forming molecular clouds and their substructures are either in approximate virial equilibrium between gravity and turbulence or overvirial, so that the cloud is either confined or expanding, and its substructures (clumps, filaments and cores) are produced by turbulent compressions. In this scheme, the star formation rate (SFR) is time-independent and determined by the turbulent and gravitational parameters of the clouds, in particular the virial parameter $\av$. Conversely, GHC assumes that most star-forming molecular clouds and their substructures are part of a continuous gravitationally-driven flow, each accreting from their parent structure. Therefore, GHC is an intrinsically {\it evolutionary} model for the clouds and their star formation rate, determined by the evolution of the collapse flow. It interprets nonthermal motions as a mixture of infall and turbulent components, with the relative importance of the former increasing as the objects become denser and/or more massive, and thus $\av$ is an {\it evolving variable} of the clouds. Tests that may provide clues to distinguishing between TS and GHC must take into account that the innermost parts of globally gravitationally bound structures may not locally appear bound, and thus the binding may have to be searched for at the largest scale of the structure.

astro-ph.GA↗

arXiv2025

Dynamical heating of newborn stars driven by accretion-induced orbital tightening

In previous works, we have shown that stars in the Orion and the Lagoon Nebula Clusters, and simulations of collapsing clouds, exhibit constant velocity dispersion as a function of mass, a result described by Lynden-Bell 50 years ago as an effect of a violent relaxation mechanism. In contrast, numerical simulations of turbulent clouds show that newborn massive stars experience stronger dynamical heating than low-mass stars. We analyzed turbulent numerical simulations and found that this effect arises from the fact that, in clouds that are globally turbulence-supported against collapse, massive stars are formed within more massive and denser clumps and in more crowded environments compared to low-mass stars. This allows them to accrete more mass and interact with other stars simultaneously. As they become more massive, their orbits tighten, increasing their velocity dispersion. In contrast, low-mass stars are formed in the periphery of such cores, more separated, and at lower densities. Thus, their velocity dispersion remains lower because they do not accrete as vigorously as massive stars and tend to be more isolated. We call this mechanism "accretion-induced orbital tightening." Our results and previous findings about violent relaxation provide a key observational diagnostic of how to distinguish the dynamic state of star-forming molecular clouds through the kinematics of their newborn stars.

astro-ph.GA↗

arXiv2024

Gravity or turbulence? VI. The physics behind the Kennicutt-Schmidt relations

We explain the large variety of star formation laws in terms of one single, simple law that can be inferred from the definition of the star formation rate and basic algebra. The resulting equation, $\SFR = \eff\ \Mcollapsing/\tauff$, although it has been presented elsewhere, is interpreted in terms of clouds undergoing collapse { rather than being turbulence-supported, an idea that different groups have pursued this century}. Under such assumption, one can explain the constancy of $\eff$, the different intra-cloud correlations observed in Milky Way's molecular clouds, as well as the resolved and unresolved extragalactic relationships between SFR and a measurement of the mass in CO, HCN, and CO+HI. We also explain why the slope of the correlation changes when the orbital time $\tauorb$ is considered instead of the free-fall time, and why estimations of the free-fall time from extragalactic observations skew the correlation, providing a false sublinear correlation. We furthermore show that the apparent nearly linear correlation between the star formation rate and the dynamical equilibrium pressure in the midplane of the galaxies, $\PDE$, is just a consequence of $\PDE$ values being dominated by the variation of the column density of molecular gas. All in all, we argue that the star formation law is driven by the collapse of cold, dense gas, which happens to be primarily molecular in the present Universe, and that the role of stellar feedback is just to shut down the star formation process, not to shape the star formation law.

astro-ph.GA↗

arXiv2023

The kinetic and magnetic energy budget of hub-filament systems during the gravitational fragmentation of molecular clouds

We present a numerical study of the balance between the gravitational (Eg), kinetic (Ek), and magnetic (Em) energies of structures within a hub-filament system in a simulation of the formation and global hierarchical collapse (GHC) of a giant molecular cloud. For structures defined by various density thresholds, and at different evolutionary stages, we investigate the scaling of the virial parameter, $α$, with mass $M$, and of the Larson ratio, ${\cal{L}}\equivσ_v/R^{1/2}$, with column density $Σ$, where $σ_v$ is the 1D velocity dispersion, and $R$ is an effective radius. We also investigate these scalings for the corresponding magnetic parameters $α_m$ and ${\cal{L}}_m$. Finally, we compare our numerical results with an observational sample of massive clumps. We find that: 1) $α_m$ and ${\cal{L}}_m$ follow similar scalings as their kinetic counterparts, although the ratio Em/Ek decreases as |Eg| increases. 2) The largest objects, defined by the lowest thresholds, tend to appear gravitationally bound (and magnetically supercritical), while their internal substructures tend to appear unbound (and subcritical). This suggests that the latter are being compressed by the infall of their parent structures, and supports earlier suggestions that the measured mass-to-magnetic flux ratio $μ$ decreases inwards in a centrally-peaked cloud under ideal MHD. 3)~The scatter in the $α$-$M$ and ${\cal{L}}$-$Σ$ plots is reduced when Ek and Em are plotted directly against Eg, suggesting that the scatter is due to an ambiguity between mass and size. 4) The clumps in our GHC simulation follow the same trends as the observational sample of massive clumps in the $α$-$M$ and ${\cal{L}}$-$Σ$ diagrams. We conclude that the main controlling parameter of the energy budget in the structures is Eg, with the kinetic and magnetic energies being derived from it.

astro-ph.GA↗

arXiv2022

Why most molecular clouds are gravitationally dominated

Observational and theoretical evidence suggests that a substantial population of molecular clouds (MCs) appear to be unbound, dominated by turbulent motions. However, these estimations are made typically via the so-called viral parameter $α_{\rm vir}^{\rm class}$, which is an observational proxy to the virial ratio between the kinetic and the gravitational energy. This parameter intrinsically assumes that MCs are isolated, spherical, and with constant density. However, MCs are embedded in their parent galaxy and thus are subject to compressive and disruptive tidal forces from their galaxy, exhibit irregular shapes, and show substantial substructure. We, therefore, compare the typical estimations of $α_{\rm vir}^{\rm class}$ to a more precise definition of the virial parameter, $α_{\rm vir}^{\rm full}$, which accounts not only for the self-gravity (as $α_{\rm vir}^{\rm class}$), but also for the tidal stresses, and thus, it can take negative (self-gravity) and positive (tides) values. While we recover the classical result that most of the clouds appear to be unbound, having $α_{\rm vir}^{\rm class} > 2$, we show that, with the more detailed definition considering the full gravitational energy, (i) 50\%\ of the total population is gravitationally bound, however, (ii) another 20\%\ is gravitationally dominated, but with tides tearing them apart; (iii) the source of those tides does not come from the galactic structure (bulge, halo, spiral arms), but from the molecular cloud complexes in which clouds reside, and probably (iv) from massive young stellar complexes, if they were present. (v) Finally, our results also suggest that, interstellar turbulence can have, at least partially, a gravitational origin.

astro-ph.GA↗

arXiv2022

Gravity or turbulence V: Star forming regions undergoing violent relaxation

Using numerical simulations of the formation and evolution of stellar clusters within molecular clouds, we show that the stars in clusters formed within collapsing molecular cloud clumps exhibit a constant velocity dispersion regardless of their mass, as expected in a violent relaxation processes. In contrast, clusters formed in turbulence-dominated environments exhibit an {\it inverse} mass segregated velocity dispersion, where massive stars exhibit larger velocity dispersions than low-mass cores, consistent with massive stars formed in massive clumps, which in turn, are formed through strong shocks. We furthermore use Gaia EDR3 to show that the stars in the Orion Nebula Cluster exhibit a constant velocity dispersion as a function of mass, suggesting that it has been formed by collapse within one free-fall time of its parental cloud, rather than in a turbulence-dominated environment during many free-fall times of a supported cloud. Additionally, we have addressed several of the criticisms of models of collapsing star forming regions: namely, the age spread of the ONC, the comparison of the ages of the stars to the free-fall time of the gas that formed it, the star formation efficiency, and the mass densities of clouds vs the mass densities of stellar clusters, showing that observational and numerical data are consistent with clusters forming in clouds undergoing a process of global, hierarchical and chaotic collapse, rather than been supported by turbulence.

astro-ph.GA↗

arXiv2020

Simultaneous evolution of the virial parameter and star formation rate in molecular clumps undergoing global hierarchical collapse

We compare dense clumps and cores in a numerical simulation of molecular clouds (MCs) undergoing global hierarchical collapse (GHC) to observations in two MCs at different evolutionary stages, the Pipe and the G14.225 clouds, to test the ability of the GHC scenario to follow the early evolution of the energy budget and star formation activity of these structures. In the simulation, we select a region that contains cores of sizes and densities similar to the Pipe cores, and find that it evolves through accretion, developing substructure similar to that of G14.225 cloud after $\sim 1.6$ Myr. Within this region, we follow the evolution of the Larson ratio $\mathcal{L} \equiv σ_{\rm v}/R^{1/2}$, where $σ_{\rm v}$ is the velocity dispersion and $R$ is the size, the virial parameter $α$, and the star formation activity of the cores/clumps. In the simulation, we find that as the region evolves: $i)$ its clumps have $\mathcal{L}$ and $α$ values first consistent with those of the Pipe substructures and later with those of G14.225; $ii)$ the individual cores first exhibit a decrease in $α$ followed by an increase when star formation begins; $iii)$ collectively, the ensemble of cores/clumps reproduces the observed trend of lower $α$ for higher-mass objects, and $iv)$ the star formation rate and star formation efficiency increase monotonically. We suggest that this evolution is due to the simultaneous loss of externally-driven compressive kinetic energy and increase of the self-gravity-driven motions. We conclude that the GHC scenario provides a realistic description of the evolution of the energy budget of the clouds' substructure at early times, which occurs simultaneously with an evolution of the star formation activity.

astro-ph.GA↗

arXiv2016

Energy budget of forming clumps in numerical simulations of collapsing clouds

We analyze the physical properties and energy balance of density enhancements in two SPH simulations of the formation, evolution, and collapse of giant molecular clouds. In the simulations, no feedback is included, so all motions are due either to the initial, decaying turbulence, or to gravitational contraction. We define clumps as connected regions above a series of density thresholds. The resultingfull set of clumps follows the generalized energy-equipartition relation $σ_{v}/R^{1/2} \propto Σ^{1/2}$, where $σ_{v}$ is the velocity dispersion, $R$ is the "radius", and $Σ$ is the column density. We interpret this as a natural consequence of gravitational contraction at all scales, rather than virial equilibrium. Nevertheless, clumps with low $Σ$ tend to show a large scatter around equipartition. In more than half of the cases, this scatter is dominated by external turbulent compressions that {\it assemble} the clumps, rather than by small-scale random motions that would disperse them. The other half does actually disperse. Moreover, clump sub-samples selected by means of different criteria exhibit different scalings. Sub-samples with narrow $Σ$ ranges follow Larson-like relations, although characterized by their respective value of $Σ$. Finally, we find that: i) clumps lying in filaments tend to appear sub-virial; ii) high-density cores ($n \ge 10^5$ cm$^3$) that exhibit moderate kinetic energy excesses often contain sink ("stellar") particles, and the excess disappears when the stellar mass is taken into account in the energy balance; iii) cores with kinetic energy excess but no stellar particles are truly in a state of dispersal.

astro-ph.GA↗

arXiv2015

Gravity or turbulence? -III. Evidence of pure thermal Jeans fragmentation at ~0.1 pc scale

We combine previously published interferometric and single-dish data of relatively nearby massive dense cores that are actively forming stars to test whether their `fragmentation level' is controlled by turbulent or thermal support. We find no clear correlation between the fragmentation level and velocity dispersion, nor between the observed number of fragments and the number of fragments expected when the gravitationally unstable mass is calculated including various prescriptions for `turbulent support'. On the other hand, the best correlation is found for the case of pure thermal Jeans fragmentation, for which we infer a core formation efficiency around 13 per cent, consistent with previous works. We conclude that the dominant factor determining the fragmentation level of star-forming massive dense cores at 0.1 pc scale seems to be thermal Jeans fragmentation.

astro-ph.GA↗