Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Vince Lyzinski

Publications and source records attributed to Vince Lyzinski.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Multiplex graph matching matched filters

We consider the problem of detecting a noisy induced multiplex template network in a larger multiplex background network. Our approach, which extends the framework of Sussman et al. (2019) to the multiplex setting, leverages a multiplex analogue of the classical graph matching problem to use the template as a matched filter for efficiently searching the background for candidate template matches. The effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated both theoretically and empirically, with particular attention paid to the potential benefits of considering multiple channels.

cs.SI↗

The Phantom Alignment Strength Conjecture: Practical use of graph matching alignment strength to indicate a meaningful graph match

The alignment strength of a graph matching is a quantity that gives the practitioner a measure of the correlation of the two graphs, and it can also give the practitioner a sense for whether the graph matching algorithm found the true matching. Unfortunately, when a graph matching algorithm fails to find the truth because of weak signal, there may be "phantom alignment strength" from meaningless matchings that, by random noise, have fewer disagreements than average (sometimes substantially fewer); this alignment strength may give the misleading appearance of significance. A practitioner needs to know what level of alignment strength may be phantom alignment strength and what level indicates that the graph matching algorithm obtained the true matching and is a meaningful measure of the graph correlation. The {\it Phantom Alignment Strength Conjecture} introduced here provides a principled and practical means to approach this issue. We provide empirical evidence for the conjecture, and explore its consequences.

math.OC↗

Leveraging semantically similar queries for ranking via combining representations

In modern ranking problems, different and disparate representations of the items to be ranked are often available. It is sensible, then, to try to combine these representations to improve ranking. Indeed, learning to rank via combining representations is both principled and practical for learning a ranking function for a particular query. In extremely data-scarce settings, however, the amount of labeled data available for a particular query can lead to a highly variable and ineffective ranking function. One way to mitigate the effect of the small amount of data is to leverage information from semantically similar queries. Indeed, as we demonstrate in simulation settings and real data examples, when semantically similar queries are available it is possible to gainfully use them when ranking with respect to a particular query. We describe and explore this phenomenon in the context of the bias-variance trade off and apply it to the data-scarce settings of a Bing navigational graph and the Drosophila larva connectome.

cs.LG↗

The Importance of Being Correlated: Implications of Dependence in Joint Spectral Inference across Multiple Networks

Spectral inference on multiple networks is a rapidly-developing subfield of graph statistics. Recent work has demonstrated that joint, or simultaneous, spectral embedding of multiple independent networks can deliver more accurate estimation than individual spectral decompositions of those same networks. Such inference procedures typically rely heavily on independence assumptions across the multiple network realizations, and even in this case, little attention has been paid to the induced network correlation in such joint embeddings. Here, we present a generalized omnibus embedding methodology and provide a detailed analysis of this embedding across both independent and correlated networks, the latter of which significantly extends the reach of such procedures. We describe how this omnibus embedding can itself induce correlation, leading us to distinguish between inherent correlation -- the correlation that arises naturally in multisample network data -- and induced correlation, which is an artifice of the joint embedding methodology. We show that the generalized omnibus embedding procedure is flexible and robust, and prove both consistency and a central limit theorem for the embedded points. We examine how induced and inherent correlation can impact inference for network time series data, and we provide network analogues of classical questions such as the effective sample size for more generally correlated data. Further, we show how an appropriately calibrated generalized omnibus embedding can detect changes in real biological networks that previous embedding procedures could not discern, confirming that the effect of inherent and induced correlation can be subtle and transformative, with import in theory and practice.

stat.ME↗

Graph matching between bipartite and unipartite networks: to collapse, or not to collapse, that is the question

Graph matching consists of aligning the vertices of two unlabeled graphs in order to maximize the shared structure across networks; when the graphs are unipartite, this is commonly formulated as minimizing their edge disagreements. In this paper, we address the common setting in which one of the graphs to match is a bipartite network and one is unipartite. Commonly, the bipartite networks are collapsed or projected into a unipartite graph, and graph matching proceeds as in the classical setting. This potentially leads to noisy edge estimates and loss of information. We formulate the graph matching problem between a bipartite and a unipartite graph using an undirected graphical model, and introduce methods to find the alignment with this model without collapsing. We theoretically demonstrate that our methodology is consistent, and provide non-asymptotic conditions that ensure exact recovery of the matching solution. In simulations and real data examples, we show how our methods can result in a more accurate matching than the naive approach of transforming the bipartite networks into unipartite, and we demonstrate the performance gains achieved by our method in simulated and real data networks, including a co-authorship-citation network pair, and brain structural and functional data.

stat.ML↗

On a complete and sufficient statistic for the correlated Bernoulli random graph model

Inference on vertex-aligned graphs is of wide theoretical and practical importance.There are, however, few flexible and tractable statistical models for correlated graphs, and even fewer comprehensive approaches to parametric inference on data arising from such graphs. In this paper, we consider the correlated Bernoulli random graph model (allowing different Bernoulli coefficients and edge correlations for different pairs of vertices), and we introduce a new variance-reducing technique -- called \emph{balancing} -- that can refine estimators for model parameters. Specifically, we construct a disagreement statistic and show that it is complete and sufficient; balancing can be interpreted as Rao-Blackwellization with this disagreement statistic. We show that for unbiased estimators of functions of model parameters, balancing generates uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimators (UMVUEs). However, even when unbiased estimators for model parameters do {\em not} exist -- which, as we prove, is the case with both the heterogeneity correlation and the total correlation parameters -- balancing is still useful, and lowers mean squared error. In particular, we demonstrate how balancing can improve the efficiency of the alignment strength estimator for the total correlation, a parameter that plays a critical role in graph matchability and graph matching runtime complexity.

math.ST↗

Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Graph Matching in Errorfully Observed Networks

Given a pair of graphs with the same number of vertices, the inexact graph matching problem consists in finding a correspondence between the vertices of these graphs that minimizes the total number of induced edge disagreements. We study this problem from a statistical framework in which one of the graphs is an errorfully observed copy of the other. We introduce a corrupting channel model, and show that in this model framework, the solution to the graph matching problem is a maximum likelihood estimator. Necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency of this MLE are presented, as well as a relaxed notion of consistency in which a negligible fraction of the vertices need not be matched correctly. The results are used to study matchability in several families of random graphs, including edge independent models, random regular graphs and small-world networks. We also use these results to introduce measures of matching feasibility, and experimentally validate the results on simulated and real-world networks.

stat.ML↗

Vertex Nomination, Consistent Estimation, and Adversarial Modification

Given a pair of graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ and a vertex set of interest in $G_1$, the vertex nomination (VN) problem seeks to find the corresponding vertices of interest in $G_2$ (if they exist) and produce a rank list of the vertices in $G_2$, with the corresponding vertices of interest in $G_2$ concentrating, ideally, at the top of the rank list. In this paper, we define and derive the analogue of Bayes optimality for VN with multiple vertices of interest, and we define the notion of maximal consistency classes in vertex nomination. This theory forms the foundation for a novel VN adversarial contamination model, and we demonstrate with real and simulated data that there are VN schemes that perform effectively in the uncontaminated setting, and adversarial network contamination adversely impacts the performance of our VN scheme. We further define a network regularization method for mitigating the impact of the adversarial contamination, and we demonstrate the effectiveness of regularization in both real and synthetic data.

stat.ML↗

Numerical tolerance for spectral decompositions of random matrices

We precisely quantify the impact of statistical error in the quality of a numerical approximation to a random matrix eigendecomposition, and under mild conditions, we use this to introduce an optimal numerical tolerance for residual error in spectral decompositions of random matrices. We demonstrate that terminating an eigendecomposition algorithm when the numerical error and statistical error are of the same order results in computational savings with no loss of accuracy. We also repair a flaw in a ubiquitous termination condition, one in wide employ in several computational linear algebra implementations. We illustrate the practical consequences of our stopping criterion with an analysis of simulated and real networks. Our theoretical results and real-data examples establish that the tradeoff between statistical and numerical error is of significant import for data science.

stat.CO↗

Vertex nomination: The canonical sampling and the extended spectral nomination schemes

Suppose that one particular block in a stochastic block model is of interest, but block labels are only observed for a few of the vertices in the network. Utilizing a graph realized from the model and the observed block labels, the vertex nomination task is to order the vertices with unobserved block labels into a ranked nomination list with the goal of having an abundance of interesting vertices near the top of the list. There are vertex nomination schemes in the literature, including the optimally precise canonical nomination scheme~$\mathcal{L}^C$ and the consistent spectral partitioning nomination scheme~$\mathcal{L}^P$. While the canonical nomination scheme $\mathcal{L}^C$ is provably optimally precise, it is computationally intractable, being impractical to implement even on modestly sized graphs. With this in mind, an approximation of the canonical scheme---denoted the {\it canonical sampling nomination scheme} $\mathcal{L}^{CS}$---is introduced; $\mathcal{L}^{CS}$ relies on a scalable, Markov chain Monte Carlo-based approximation of $\mathcal{L}^{C}$, and converges to $\mathcal{L}^{C}$ as the amount of sampling goes to infinity. The spectral partitioning nomination scheme is also extended to the {\it extended spectral partitioning nomination scheme}, $\mathcal{L}^{EP}$, which introduces a novel semisupervised clustering framework to improve upon the precision of $\mathcal{L}^P$. Real-data and simulation experiments are employed to illustrate the precision of these vertex nomination schemes, as well as their empirical computational complexity. Keywords: vertex nomination, Markov chain Monte Carlo, spectral partitioning, Mclust MSC[2010]: 60J22, 65C40, 62H30, 62H25

stat.ML↗

Alignment Strength and Correlation for Graphs

When two graphs have a correlated Bernoulli distribution, we prove that the alignment strength of their natural bijection strongly converges to a novel measure of graph correlation $ρ_T$ that neatly combines intergraph with intragraph distribution parameters. Within broad families of the random graph parameter settings, we illustrate that exact graph matching runtime and also matchability are both functions of $ρ_T$, with thresholding behavior starkly illustrated in matchability.

math.CO↗

Seeded Graph Matching Via Joint Optimization of Fidelity and Commensurability

We present a novel approximate graph matching algorithm that incorporates seeded data into the graph matching paradigm. Our Joint Optimization of Fidelity and Commensurability (JOFC) algorithm embeds two graphs into a common Euclidean space where the matching inference task can be performed. Through real and simulated data examples, we demonstrate the versatility of our algorithm in matching graphs with various characteristics--weightedness, directedness, loopiness, many-to-one and many-to-many matchings, and soft seedings.

stat.ML↗

Vertex Nomination Via Seeded Graph Matching

Consider two networks on overlapping, non-identical vertex sets. Given vertices of interest in the first network, we seek to identify the corresponding vertices, if any exist, in the second network. While in moderately sized networks graph matching methods can be applied directly to recover the missing correspondences, herein we present a principled methodology appropriate for situations in which the networks are too large for brute-force graph matching. Our methodology identifies vertices in a local neighborhood of the vertices of interest in the first network that have verifiable corresponding vertices in the second network. Leveraging these known correspondences, referred to as seeds, we match the induced subgraphs in each network generated by the neighborhoods of these verified seeds, and rank the vertices of the second network in terms of the most likely matches to the original vertices of interest. We demonstrate the applicability of our methodology through simulations and real data examples.

stat.ML↗

Matched Filters for Noisy Induced Subgraph Detection

The problem of finding the vertex correspondence between two noisy graphs with different number of vertices where the smaller graph is still large has many applications in social networks, neuroscience, and computer vision. We propose a solution to this problem via a graph matching matched filter: centering and padding the smaller adjacency matrix and applying graph matching methods to align it to the larger network. The centering and padding schemes can be incorporated into any algorithm that matches using adjacency matrices. Under a statistical model for correlated pairs of graphs, which yields a noisy copy of the small graph within the larger graph, the resulting optimization problem can be guaranteed to recover the true vertex correspondence between the networks. However, there are currently no efficient algorithms for solving this problem. To illustrate the possibilities and challenges of such problems, we use an algorithm that can exploit a partially known correspondence and show via varied simulations and applications to {\it Drosophila} and human connectomes that this approach can achieve good performance.

stat.ML↗

A central limit theorem for an omnibus embedding of multiple random graphs and implications for multiscale network inference

Performing statistical analyses on collections of graphs is of import to many disciplines, but principled, scalable methods for multi-sample graph inference are few. Here we describe an "omnibus" embedding in which multiple graphs on the same vertex set are jointly embedded into a single space with a distinct representation for each graph. We prove a central limit theorem for this embedding and demonstrate how it streamlines graph comparison, obviating the need for pairwise subspace alignments. The omnibus embedding achieves near-optimal inference accuracy when graphs arise from a common distribution and yet retains discriminatory power as a test procedure for the comparison of different graphs. Moreover, this joint embedding and the accompanying central limit theorem are important for answering multiscale graph inference questions, such as the identification of specific subgraphs or vertices responsible for similarity or difference across networks. We illustrate this with a pair of analyses of connectome data derived from dMRI and fMRI scans of human subjects. In particular, we show that this embedding allows the identification of specific brain regions associated with population-level differences. Finally, we sketch how the omnibus embedding can be used to address pressing open problems, both theoretical and practical, in multisample graph inference.

stat.ME↗

Matchability of heterogeneous networks pairs

We consider the problem of graph matchability in non-identically distributed networks. In a general class of edge-independent networks, we demonstrate that graph matchability can be lost with high probability when matching the networks directly. We further demonstrate that under mild model assumptions, matchability is almost perfectly recovered by centering the networks using Universal Singular Value Thresholding before matching. These theoretical results are then demonstrated in both real and synthetic simulation settings. We also recover analogous core-matchability results in a very general core-junk network model, wherein some vertices do not correspond between the graph pair.

math.ST↗

On a 'Two Truths' Phenomenon in Spectral Graph Clustering

Clustering is concerned with coherently grouping observations without any explicit concept of true groupings. Spectral graph clustering - clustering the vertices of a graph based on their spectral embedding - is commonly approached via K-means (or, more generally, Gaussian mixture model) clustering composed with either Laplacian or Adjacency spectral embedding (LSE or ASE). Recent theoretical results provide new understanding of the problem and solutions, and lead us to a 'Two Truths' LSE vs. ASE spectral graph clustering phenomenon convincingly illustrated here via a diffusion MRI connectome data set: the different embedding methods yield different clustering results, with LSE capturing left hemisphere/right hemisphere affinity structure and ASE capturing gray matter/white matter core-periphery structure.

stat.ML↗

On consistent vertex nomination schemes

Given a vertex of interest in a network $G_1$, the vertex nomination problem seeks to find the corresponding vertex of interest (if it exists) in a second network $G_2$. A vertex nomination scheme produces a list of the vertices in $G_2$, ranked according to how likely they are judged to be the corresponding vertex of interest in $G_2$. The vertex nomination problem and related information retrieval tasks have attracted much attention in the machine learning literature, with numerous applications to social and biological networks. However, the current framework has often been confined to a comparatively small class of network models, and the concept of statistically consistent vertex nomination schemes has been only shallowly explored. In this paper, we extend the vertex nomination problem to a very general statistical model of graphs. Further, drawing inspiration from the long-established classification framework in the pattern recognition literature, we provide definitions for the key notions of Bayes optimality and consistency in our extended vertex nomination framework, including a derivation of the Bayes optimal vertex nomination scheme. In addition, we prove that no universally consistent vertex nomination schemes exist. Illustrative examples are provided throughout.

stat.ML↗