arXiv subjects

Vincent Audigier

Publications and source records attributed to Vincent Audigier.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2023

A simple Bayesian model to estimate proportions and ratios from count data with a hierarchical error structure with an application to droplet digital PCR experiments

Experimental designs with hierarchically-structured errors are pervasive in many biomedical areas; it is important to take into account this hierarchical architecture in order to account for the dispersion and make reliable inferences from the data. This paper addresses the question of estimating a proportion or a ratio from positive or negative count data akin to those generated by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction experiments when the number of biological or technical replicates is limited. We present and discuss a Bayesian framework, for which we provide and implement a Gibbs sampler in R and compare it to a random effect model.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2023

Multiple imputation of incomplete multilevel data using Heckman selection models

Missing data is a common problem in medical research, and is commonly addressed using multiple imputation. Although traditional imputation methods allow for valid statistical inference when data are missing at random (MAR), their implementation is problematic when the presence of missingness depends on unobserved variables, i.e. the data are missing not at random (MNAR). Unfortunately, this MNAR situation is rather common, in observational studies, registries and other sources of real-world data. While several imputation methods have been proposed for addressing individual studies when data are MNAR, their application and validity in large datasets with multilevel structure remains unclear. We therefore explored the consequence of MNAR data in hierarchical data in-depth, and proposed a novel multilevel imputation method for common missing patterns in clustered datasets. This method is based on the principles of Heckman selection models and adopts a two-stage meta-analysis approach to impute binary and continuous variables that may be outcomes or predictors and that are systematically or sporadically missing. After evaluating the proposed imputation model in simulated scenarios, we illustrate it use in a cross-sectional community survey to estimate the prevalence of malaria parasitemia in children aged 2-10 years in five subregions in Uganda.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2022

Clustering with missing data: which equivalent for Rubin's rules?

Multiple imputation (MI) is a popular method for dealing with missing values. However, the suitable way for applying clustering after MI remains unclear: how to pool partitions? How to assess the clustering instability when data are incomplete? By answering both questions, this paper proposed a complete view of clustering with missing data using MI. The problem of partitions pooling is here addressed using consensus clustering while, based on the bootstrap theory, we explain how to assess the instability related to observed and missing data. The new rules for pooling partitions and instability assessment are theoretically argued and extensively studied by simulation. Partitions pooling improves accuracy, while measuring instability with missing data enlarges the data analysis possibilities: it allows assessment of the dependence of the clustering to the imputation model, as well as a convenient way for choosing the number of clusters when data are incomplete, as illustrated on a real data set.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

An ensemble learning method for variable selection: application to high dimensional data and missing values

Standard approaches for variable selection in linear models are not tailored to deal properly with high-dimensional and incomplete data. Currently, methods dedicated to high-dimensional data handle missing values by ad-hoc strategies, like complete case analysis or single imputation, while methods dedicated to missing values, mainly based on multiple imputation, do not discuss the imputation method to use with high-dimensional data. Consequently, both approaches appear to be limited for many modern applications. With inspiration from ensemble methods, a new variable selection method is proposed. It extends classical variable selection methods in the case of high-dimensional data with or without missing data. Theoretical properties are studied and the practical interest is demonstrated through a simulation study, as well as through an application to models specification in sequential multiple imputation. In the low dimensional case, the procedure improves the control of the error risks, especially type I error, even without missing values for stepwise, lasso or knockoff methods. With missing values, the method performs better than reference selection methods based on multiple imputation. Similar performances are obtained in the high-dimensional case with or without missing values.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

Clustering with missing data: which imputation model for which cluster analysis method?

Multiple imputation (MI) is a popular method for dealing with missing values. One main advantage of MI is to separate the imputation phase and the analysis one. However, both are related since they are based on distribution assumptions that have to be consistent. This point is well known as congeniality. In this paper, we discuss congeniality for clustering on continuous data. First, we theoretically highlight how two joint modeling (JM) MI methods (JM-GL and JM-DP) are congenial with various clustering methods. Then, we propose a new fully conditional specification (FCS) MI method with the same theoretical properties as JM-GL. Finally, we extend this FCS MI method to account for more complex distributions. Based on an extensive simulation study, all MI methods are compared for various cluster analysis methods (k-means, k-medoids, mixture model, hierarchical clustering). This study highlights the partition accuracy is improved when the imputation model accounts for clustered individuals. From this point of view, standard MI methods ignoring such a structure should be avoided. JM-GL and JM-DP should be recommended when data are distributed according to a gaussian mixture model, while FCS methods outperform JM ones on more complex data.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2017

Multiple imputation for multilevel data with continuous and binary variables

We present and compare multiple imputation methods for multilevel continuous and binary data where variables are systematically and sporadically missing. The methods are compared from a theoretical point of view and through an extensive simulation study motivated by a real dataset comprising multiple studies. Simulations are reproducible. The comparisons show why these multiple imputation methods are the most appropriate to handle missing values in a multilevel setting and why their relative performances can vary according to the missing data pattern, the multilevel structure and the type of missing variables. This study shows that valid inferences can only be obtained if the dataset gathers a large number of clusters. In addition, it highlights that heteroscedastic MI methods provide more accurate inferences than homoscedastic methods, which should be reserved for data with few individuals per cluster. Finally, the method of Quartagno and Carpenter (2016a) appears generally accurate for binary variables, the method of Resche-Rigon and White (2016) with large clusters, and the approach of Jolani et al. (2015) with small clusters.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2015

Multiple imputation for continuous variables using a Bayesian principal component analysis

We propose a multiple imputation method based on principal component analysis (PCA) to deal with incomplete continuous data. To reflect the uncertainty of the parameters from one imputation to the next, we use a Bayesian treatment of the PCA model. Using a simulation study and real data sets, the method is compared to two classical approaches: multiple imputation based on joint modelling and on fully conditional modelling. Contrary to the others, the proposed method can be easily used on data sets where the number of individuals is less than the number of variables and when the variables are highly correlated. In addition, it provides unbiased point estimates of quantities of interest, such as an expectation, a regression coefficient or a correlation coefficient, with a smaller mean squared error. Furthermore, the widths of the confidence intervals built for the quantities of interest are often smaller whilst ensuring a valid coverage.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2015

MIMCA: Multiple imputation for categorical variables with multiple correspondence analysis

We propose a multiple imputation method to deal with incomplete categorical data. This method imputes the missing entries using the principal components method dedicated to categorical data: multiple correspondence analysis (MCA). The uncertainty concerning the parameters of the imputation model is reflected using a non-parametric bootstrap. Multiple imputation using MCA (MIMCA) requires estimating a small number of parameters due to the dimensionality reduction property of MCA. It allows the user to impute a large range of data sets. In particular, a high number of categories per variable, a high number of variables or a small the number of individuals are not an issue for MIMCA. Through a simulation study based on real data sets, the method is assessed and compared to the reference methods (multiple imputation using the loglinear model, multiple imputation by logistic regressions) as well to the latest works on the topic (multiple imputation by random forests or by the Dirichlet process mixture of products of multinomial distributions model). The proposed method shows good performances in terms of bias and coverage for an analysis model such as a main effects logistic regression model. In addition, MIMCA has the great advantage that it is substantially less time consuming on data sets of high dimensions than the other multiple imputation methods.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2013

A principal components method to impute missing values for mixed data

We propose a new method to impute missing values in mixed datasets. It is based on a principal components method, the factorial analysis for mixed data, which balances the influence of all the variables that are continuous and categorical in the construction of the dimensions of variability. Because the imputation uses the principal axes and components, the prediction of the missing values are based on the similarity between individuals and on the relationships between variables. The quality of the imputation is assessed through a simulation study and real datasets. The method is compared to a recent method (Stekhoven and Bühlmann, 2011) based on random forests and shows better performances especially for the imputation of categorical variables and when there are highly linear relationships between continuous variables.

stat.AP↗