arXiv subjects

Vivek Muralidharan

Publications and source records attributed to Vivek Muralidharan.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2024

DRIFT: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Intelligent Floating Platforms Trajectories

This investigation introduces a novel deep reinforcement learning-based suite to control floating platforms in both simulated and real-world environments. Floating platforms serve as versatile test-beds to emulate micro-gravity environments on Earth, useful to test autonomous navigation systems for space applications. Our approach addresses the system and environmental uncertainties in controlling such platforms by training policies capable of precise maneuvers amid dynamic and unpredictable conditions. Leveraging Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) techniques, our suite achieves robustness, adaptability, and good transferability from simulation to reality. Our deep reinforcement learning framework provides advantages such as fast training times, large-scale testing capabilities, rich visualization options, and ROS bindings for integration with real-world robotic systems. Being open access, our suite serves as a comprehensive platform for practitioners who want to replicate similar research in their own simulated environments and labs.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2024

Assessing The Potential Of Mid-Sized Language Models For Clinical QA

Large language models, such as GPT-4 and Med-PaLM, have shown impressive performance on clinical tasks; however, they require access to compute, are closed-source, and cannot be deployed on device. Mid-size models such as BioGPT-large, BioMedLM, LLaMA 2, and Mistral 7B avoid these drawbacks, but their capacity for clinical tasks has been understudied. To help assess their potential for clinical use and help researchers decide which model they should use, we compare their performance on two clinical question-answering (QA) tasks: MedQA and consumer query answering. We find that Mistral 7B is the best performing model, winning on all benchmarks and outperforming models trained specifically for the biomedical domain. While Mistral 7B's MedQA score of 63.0% approaches the original Med-PaLM, and it often can produce plausible responses to consumer health queries, room for improvement still exists. This study provides the first head-to-head assessment of open source mid-sized models on clinical tasks.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

Emulating On-Orbit Interactions Using Forward Dynamics Based Cartesian Motion

On-orbit operations such as servicing and assembly are considered a priority for the future space industry. Ground-based facilities that emulate on-orbit interactions are key tools for developing and testing space technology. This paper presents a control framework to emulate on-orbit operations using on-ground robotic manipulators. It combines Virtual Forward Dynamics Models (VFDM) for Cartesian motion control of robotic manipulators with an Orbital Dynamics Simulator (ODS) based on the Clohessy Wiltshire (CW) Model. The VFDM-based Inverse Kinematics (IK) solver is known to have better motion tracking, path accuracy, and solver convergency than traditional IK solvers. Thus, it provides a stable Cartesian motion for manipulators based on orbit emulations, even at singular or near singular configurations. The framework is tested at the ZeroG-Lab robotic facility of the SnT by emulating two scenarios: free-floating satellite motion and free-floating interaction (collision). Results show fidelity between the simulated motion commanded by the ODS and the one executed by the robot-mounted mockups.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2022

Evaluation of Position and Velocity Based Forward Dynamics Compliance Control (FDCC) for Robotic Interactions in Position Controlled Robots

In robotic manipulation, end-effector compliance is an essential precondition for performing contact-rich tasks, such as machining, assembly, and human-robot interaction. Most robotic arms are position-controlled stiff systems at a hardware level. Thus, adding compliance becomes essential. Compliance in those systems has been recently achieved using Forward dynamics compliance control (FDCC), which, owing to its virtual forward dynamics model, can be implemented on both position and velocity-controlled robots. This paper evaluates the choice of control interface (and hence the control domain), which, although considered trivial, is essential due to differences in their characteristics. In some cases, the choice is restricted to the available hardware interface. However, given the option to choose, the velocity-based control interface makes a better candidate for compliance control because of smoother compliant behaviour, reduced interaction forces, and work done. To prove these points, in this paper FDCC is evaluated on the UR10e six-DOF manipulator with velocity and position control modes. The evaluation is based on force-control benchmarking metrics using 3D-printed artefacts. Real experiments favour the choice of velocity control over position control.

cs.RO↗