Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Vivek Teja Tanjavooru

Publications and source records attributed to Vivek Teja Tanjavooru.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Learning Control Policies from Heterogeneous Multi-Horizon Time Series in Battery Energy Management Systems

This paper introduces Representation-to-Decision (R2D), an end-to-end imitation learning framework that maps heterogeneous multi-horizon time-series inputs directly to battery control decisions through modular Temporal Feature Extractors (TFEs) and a shared latent representation, without an explicit load and PV forecasting step. While accurate forecasting improves prediction quality, optimal control performance remains unguaranteed in prediction-then-optimization pipelines; standard Reinforcement Learning (RL) lacks the long-horizon temporal awareness due to short-window observations, even when forecast signals are available as additional inputs. R2D offers a different perspective: rather than forecasting first and deciding second, it learns to decide directly from raw temporal inputs, with control optimality anchored by an aging-aware Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) expert through Behavior Cloning (BC). Benchmarked against six controllers on a high-fidelity electro-thermal battery simulation across five industrial sites, R2D achieves 62--77\% of the global clairvoyant optimum, outperforms the tested Model Predictive Control (MPC) and RL benchmarks, and yields battery degradation nearly identical to its MILP teacher across all five sites. Comprehensive ablation studies over temporal backbone, model size, expert formulation, aging-cost weighting, and horizon configuration confirm that an LSTM encoder with a 15-minute single-step control horizon provides the most robust and deployment-ready configuration, and cross-site and single-factor out-of-distribution tests show that generalization to unseen profiles is profile-dependent, with policies trained on high-activity sites transferring most reliably.

eess.SY↗

Multi-Objective Nonlinear Power Split Control For BESS With Real-Time Simulation Feedback

This paper presents a mixed-integer, nonlinear, multi-objective optimization strategy for optimal power allocation among parallel strings in Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS). High-fidelity control is achieved by co-simulating the optimizer with a BESS electro-thermal simulation that models spatial thermal dynamics of the battery, providing real-time State of Charge (SOC) and temperature feedback. The optimizer prioritizes reliability by enforcing power availability as a hard constraint and penalizing battery thermal derating. Within these bounds, the controller performs a Pareto sweep on the relative weights of inverter and battery losses to balance the trade-off between inverter efficiency and battery efficiency. The inverter loss model is based on an empirical lookup table (LUT) derived from a commercial inverter system, while the battery thermal loss model uses SOC and temperature-dependent internal resistance, with electric current computed from the battery Equivalent Circuit Model (ECM). When the optimization was applied to a two-string BESS, the competing effects of inverter and battery losses on system availability and thermal derating were observed. The balanced operation yielded improvements of 1% in battery efficiency, 1.5% in inverter efficiency, and 2% in derating efficiency, while maintaining higher availability. Additionally, a 5 degrees C reduction in BESS peak temperature also suggests reduced thermal stress without compromising availability.

eess.SY↗

Price Aware Power Split Control in Heterogeneous Battery Storage Systems

This paper presents a unified framework for the optimal scheduling of battery dispatch and internal power allocation in Battery energy storage systems (BESS). This novel approach integrates both market-based (price-aware) signals and physical system constraints to simultaneously optimize (1) external energy dispatch and (2) internal heterogeneity management of BESS, enhancing its operational economic value and performance. This work compares both model-based Linear Programming (LP) and model-free Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches for optimization under varying forecast assumptions, using a custom Gym-based simulation environment. The evaluation considers both long-term and short-term performance, focusing on economic savings, State of Charge (SOC) and temperature balancing, and overall system efficiency. In summary, the long-term results show that the RL approach achieved 10% higher system efficiency compared to LP, whereas the latter yielded 33% greater cumulative savings. In terms of internal heterogeneity, the LP approach resulted in lower mean SOC imbalance, while the RL approach achieved better temperature balance between strings. This behavior is further examined in the short-term evaluation, which indicates that LP delivers strong optimization under known and stable conditions, whereas RL demonstrates higher adaptability in dynamic environments, offering potential advantages for real-time BESS control.

eess.SY↗