Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Vivian Kuperberg

Publications and source records attributed to Vivian Kuperberg.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Packings of equal disks in a square torus

Packings of equal disks in the plane are known to have density at most $π/\sqrt{12}$, although this density is never achieved in the square torus, which is what we call the plane modulo the square lattice. We find packings of disks in a square torus that we conjecture to be the most dense for certain numbers of packing disks, using continued fractions to approximate $1/\sqrt{3}$ and $2-\sqrt{3}$. We also define a constant to measure the efficiency of a packing motived by a related constant due to Markov for continued fractions. One idea is to use the unique factorization property of Gaussian integers to prove that there is an upper bound for the Markov constant for grid-like packings. By way of contrast, we show that an upper bound by Peter Gruber for the error for the limiting density of a packing of equal disks in a planar square, which is on the order of $1/\sqrt{N}$, is the best possible, whereas for our examples for the square torus, the error for the limiting density is on the order of $1/N$, where $N$ is the number of packing disks.

math.MG↗

Hadamard matrices modulo p and small modular Hadamard matrices

We use modular symmetric designs to study the existence of Hadamard matrices modulo certain primes. We solve the $7$-modular and $11$-modular versions of the Hadamard conjecture for all but a finite number of cases. In doing so, we state a conjecture for a sufficient condition for the existence of a $p$-modular Hadamard matrix for all but finitely many cases. When $2$ is a primitive root of a prime $p$, we conditionally solve this conjecture and therefore the $p$-modular version of the Hadamard conjecture for all but finitely many cases when $p \equiv 3 \pmod{4}$, and prove a weaker result for $p \equiv 1 \pmod{4}$. Finally, we look at constraints on the existence of $m$-modular Hadamard matrices when the size of the matrix is small compared to $m$.

math.CO↗