Vytautas Gapsys | Searcharxiv

arXiv2022

GROMACS in the cloud: A global supercomputer to speed up alchemical drug design

We assess costs and efficiency of state-of-the-art high performance cloud computing compared to a traditional on-premises compute cluster. Our use case are atomistic simulations carried out with the GROMACS molecular dynamics (MD) toolkit with a focus on alchemical protein-ligand binding free energy calculations. We set up a compute cluster in the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud that incorporates various different instances with Intel, AMD, and ARM CPUs, some with GPU acceleration. Using representative biomolecular simulation systems we benchmark how GROMACS performs on individual instances and across multiple instances. Thereby we assess which instances deliver the highest performance and which are the most cost-efficient ones for our use case. We find that, in terms of total costs including hardware, personnel, room, energy and cooling, producing MD trajectories in the cloud can be as cost-efficient as an on-premises cluster given that optimal cloud instances are chosen. Further, we find that high-throughput ligand-screening for protein-ligand binding affinity estimation can be accelerated dramatically by using global cloud resources. For a ligand screening study consisting of 19,872 independent simulations, we used all hardware that was available in the cloud at the time of the study. The computations scaled-up to reach peak performances using more than 4,000 instances, 140,000 cores, and 3,000 GPUs simultaneously around the globe. Our simulation ensemble finished in about two days in the cloud, while weeks would be required to complete the task on a typical on-premises cluster consisting of several hundred nodes. We demonstrate that the costs of such and similar studies can be drastically reduced with a checkpoint-restart protocol that allows to use cheap Spot pricing and by using instance types with optimal cost-efficiency.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2021

Best practices for constructing, preparing, and evaluating protein-ligand binding affinity benchmarks

Free energy calculations are rapidly becoming indispensable in structure-enabled drug discovery programs. As new methods, force fields, and implementations are developed, assessing their expected accuracy on real-world systems (benchmarking) becomes critical to provide users with an assessment of the accuracy expected when these methods are applied within their domain of applicability, and developers with a way to assess the expected impact of new methodologies. These assessments require construction of a benchmark - a set of well-prepared, high quality systems with corresponding experimental measurements designed to ensure the resulting calculations provide a realistic assessment of expected performance when these methods are deployed within their domains of applicability. To date, the community has not yet adopted a common standardized benchmark, and existing benchmark reports suffer from a myriad of issues, including poor data quality, limited statistical power, and statistically deficient analyses, all of which can conspire to produce benchmarks that are poorly predictive of real-world performance. Here, we address these issues by presenting guidelines for (1) curating experimental data to develop meaningful benchmark sets, (2) preparing benchmark inputs according to best practices to facilitate widespread adoption, and (3) analysis of the resulting predictions to enable statistically meaningful comparisons among methods and force fields.

q-bio.BM↗