SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

W. O. Costa-Filho

Publications and source records attributed to W. O. Costa-Filho.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Integral Identities and Rigidity of Generalized $m$-Quasi-Einstein Manifolds

We establish differential and integral identities for closed generalized $m$-quasi-Einstein manifolds $(M^n,g,X,λ)$. These identities yield criteria for conformality, the Killing condition, and triviality, and provide a unified framework for several rigidity phenomena. Afther this, we recast the integrated Bochner formula as a Witten-type Hodge-energy identity. The cancellation of its quartic term at $m=-2$ leads to a triviality theorem in the generalized setting under a natural sign condition and, in particular, proves a recently Colling--Dunajski conjecture at $m=-2$ when $λ\leq0$ is constant. An identity for the drift laplacian gives a new proof of the previously known triviality result for $m\leq-n$ and extends it to generalized $m$-quasi-Einstein manifolds. In the constant-$λ$ case, we then derive a differential identities for twisted operators that singles out the value $m=-4$. Combined with spectral and maximum-principle arguments, this yields triviality for $λ\leq0$, thereby proving the Colling--Dunajski conjecture at $m=-4$. Finally, complementing our criterion characterizing when a conformal potential field is Killing, we exhibit in the appendix a closed generalized \(m\)-quasi-Einstein manifold whose potential field is conformal but non-Killing.

math.DG

On Generalized Quasi-Einstein Manifolds

In this paper, we study generalized $m$-quasi-Einstein $(M^n,g,X,λ)$ under natural conditions on the potential vector field. We show that, under suitable integral assumptions, the potential vector field is Killing, extending earlier results of Sharma to the generalized setting. Moreover, we show that divergence-free vector fields are Killing in this context, and we derive consequences under sign conditions on $m$ and $λ$, including triviality results. We also revisit a recent theorem of Ghosh \cite{ghosh}, discuss a subtle issue in the argument, and provide a new formulation and proof. Finally, we establish rigidity results for manifolds with geodesic potential vector fields.

math.DG