arXiv subjects

Warren D. Smith

Publications and source records attributed to Warren D. Smith.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2024

Better-than-average uniform random variables and Eulerian numbers, or: How many candidates should a voter approve?

Consider $n$ independent random numbers with a uniform distribution on $[0,1]$. The number of them that exceed their mean is shown to have an Eulerian distribution, i.e., it is described by the Eulerian numbers. This is related to, but distinct from, the well known fact that the integer part of the sum of independent random numbers uniform on $[0,1]$ has an Eulerian distribution. One motivation for this problem comes from voting theory.

math.PR↗

arXiv2016

Lower bounds on maximal determinants of binary matrices via the probabilistic method

Let $D(n)$ be the maximal determinant for $n \times n$ $\{\pm 1\}$-matrices, and ${\mathcal R}(n) = D(n)/n^{n/2}$ be the ratio of $D(n)$ to the Hadamard upper bound. We give several new lower bounds on ${\mathcal R}(n)$ in terms of $d$, where $n = h+d$, $h$ is the order of a Hadamard matrix, and $h$ is maximal subject to $h \le n$. A relatively simple bound is \[{\mathcal R}(n) \ge \left(\frac{2}{πe}\right)^{d/2} \left(1 - d^2\left(\fracπ{2h}\right)^{1/2}\right) \;\text{ for all }\; n \ge 1.\] An asymptotically sharper bound is \[{\mathcal R}(n) \ge \left(\frac{2}{πe}\right)^{d/2} \exp\left(d\left(\fracπ{2h}\right)^{1/2} + \; O\left(\frac{d^{5/3}}{h^{2/3}}\right)\right).\] We also show that \[{\mathcal R}(n) \ge \left(\frac{2}{πe}\right)^{d/2}\] if $n \ge n_0$ and $n_0$ is sufficiently large, the threshold $n_0$ being independent of $d$, or for all $n\ge 1$ if $0 \le d \le 3$ (which would follow from the Hadamard conjecture). The proofs depend on the probabilistic method, and generalise previous results that were restricted to the cases $d=0$ and $d=1$.

math.CO↗

arXiv2016

Probabilistic lower bounds on maximal determinants of binary matrices

Let ${\mathcal D}(n)$ be the maximal determinant for $n \times n$ $\{\pm 1\}$-matrices, and $\mathcal R(n) = {\mathcal D}(n)/n^{n/2}$ be the ratio of ${\mathcal D}(n)$ to the Hadamard upper bound. Using the probabilistic method, we prove new lower bounds on ${\mathcal D}(n)$ and $\mathcal R(n)$ in terms of $d = n-h$, where $h$ is the order of a Hadamard matrix and $h$ is maximal subject to $h \le n$. For example, $\mathcal R(n) > (πe/2)^{-d/2}$ if $1 \le d \le 3$, and $\mathcal R(n) > (πe/2)^{-d/2}(1 - d^2(π/(2h))^{1/2})$ if $d > 3$. By a recent result of Livinskyi, $d^2/h^{1/2} \to 0$ as $n \to \infty$, so the second bound is close to $(πe/2)^{-d/2}$ for large $n$. Previous lower bounds tended to zero as $n \to \infty$ with $d$ fixed, except in the cases $d \in \{0,1\}$. For $d \ge 2$, our bounds are better for all sufficiently large $n$. If the Hadamard conjecture is true, then $d \le 3$, so the first bound above shows that $\mathcal R(n)$ is bounded below by a positive constant $(πe/2)^{-3/2} > 0.1133$.

math.CO↗

arXiv2014

Bounds on determinants of perturbed diagonal matrices

We give upper and lower bounds on the determinant of a perturbation of the identity matrix or, more generally, a perturbation of a nonsingular diagonal matrix. The matrices considered are, in general, diagonally dominant. The lower bounds are best possible, and in several cases they are stronger than well-known bounds due to Ostrowski and other authors. If $A = I-E$ is an $n \times n$ matrix and the elements of $E$ are bounded in absolute value by $\varepsilon \le 1/n$, then a lower bound of Ostrowski (1938) is $\det(A) \ge 1-n\varepsilon$. We show that if, in addition, the diagonal elements of $E$ are zero, then a best-possible lower bound is \[\det(A) \ge (1-(n-1)\varepsilon)\,(1+\varepsilon)^{n-1}.\] Corresponding upper bounds are respectively \[\det(A) \le (1 + 2\varepsilon + n\varepsilon^2)^{n/2}\] and \[\det(A) \le (1 + (n-1)\varepsilon^2)^{n/2}.\] The first upper bound is stronger than Ostrowski's bound (for $\varepsilon < 1/n$) $\det(A) \le (1 - n\varepsilon)^{-1}$. The second upper bound generalises Hadamard's inequality, which is the case $\varepsilon = 1$. A necessary and sufficient condition for our upper bounds to be best possible for matrices of order $n$ and all positive $\varepsilon$ is the existence of a skew-Hadamard matrix of order $n$.

math.NA↗

arXiv2013

Lower bounds on maximal determinants of +-1 matrices via the probabilistic method

We show that the maximal determinant D(n) for $n \times n$ ${\pm 1}$-matrices satisfies $R(n) := D(n)/n^{n/2} \ge κ_d > 0$. Here $n^{n/2}$ is the Hadamard upper bound, and $κ_d$ depends only on $d := n-h$, where $h$ is the maximal order of a Hadamard matrix with $h \le n$. Previous lower bounds on R(n) depend on both $d$ and $n$. Our bounds are improvements, for all sufficiently large $n$, if $d > 1$. We give various lower bounds on R(n) that depend only on $d$. For example, $R(n) \ge 0.07 (0.352)^d > 3^{-(d+3)}$. For any fixed $d \ge 0$ we have $R(n) \ge (2/(πe))^{d/2}$ for all sufficiently large $n$ (and conjecturally for all positive $n$). If the Hadamard conjecture is true, then $d \le 3$ and $κ_d \ge (2/(πe))^{d/2} > 1/9$.

math.CO↗

arXiv2010

Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions

Given samples from two distributions over an $n$-element set, we wish to test whether these distributions are statistically close. We present an algorithm which uses sublinear in $n$, specifically, $O(n^{2/3}ε^{-8/3}\log n)$, independent samples from each distribution, runs in time linear in the sample size, makes no assumptions about the structure of the distributions, and distinguishes the cases when the distance between the distributions is small (less than $\max\{ε^{4/3}n^{-1/3}/32, εn^{-1/2}/4\}$) or large (more than $ε$) in $\ell_1$ distance. This result can be compared to the lower bound of $Ω(n^{2/3}ε^{-2/3})$ for this problem given by Valiant. Our algorithm has applications to the problem of testing whether a given Markov process is rapidly mixing. We present sublinear for several variants of this problem as well.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2009

Linear-time nearest point algorithms for Coxeter lattices

The Coxeter lattices, which we denote $A_{n/m}$, are a family of lattices containing many of the important lattices in low dimensions. This includes $A_n$, $E_7$, $E_8$ and their duals $A_n^*$, $E_7^*$ and $E_8^*$. We consider the problem of finding a nearest point in a Coxeter lattice. We describe two new algorithms, one with worst case arithmetic complexity $O(n\log{n})$ and the other with worst case complexity O(n) where $n$ is the dimension of the lattice. We show that for the particular lattices $A_n$ and $A_n^*$ the algorithms reduce to simple nearest point algorithms that already exist in the literature.

cs.IT↗

arXiv2003

New lower bounds for the maximal determinant problem

We report new world records for the maximal determinant of an n-by-n matrix with entries +/-1. Using various techniques, we beat existing records for n=22, 23, 27, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 39, 45, 47, 53, 63, 69, 73, 77, 79, 93, and 95, and we present the record-breaking matrices here. We conjecture that our n=22 value attains the globally maximizing determinant in its dimension. We also tabulate new records for n=67, 75, 83, 87, 91 and 99, dimensions for which no previous claims have been made. The relevant matrices in all these dimensions, along with other pertinent information, are posted at http://www.indiana.edu/~maxdet \.

math.CO↗

arXiv1992

A characterization of convex hyperbolic polyhedra and of convex polyhedra inscribed in the sphere

We describe a characterization of convex polyhedra in $\h^3$ in terms of their dihedral angles, developed by Rivin. We also describe some geometric and combinatorial consequences of that theory. One of these consequences is a combinatorial characterization of convex polyhedra in $\E^3$ all of whose vertices lie on the unit sphere. That resolves a problem posed by Jakob Steiner in 1832.

math.MG↗